Menu
Pace PC10 View Gallery (1)
195-245/35-55 R16-19 28 sizes 2021

Pace PC10

Pace Tires Touring Summer

The Pace PC10 is a Touring Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.5
Tire Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
75%
Wet Grip
61%
Road Feedback
57%
Handling
60%
Wear
75%
Comfort
66%
Buy again
59%
11 Reviews
65% Average
123,040 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 48th)
Pace PC10

Pace PC10

Summer Budget
BETA
6.5 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 1
Publications: 1
Period: 2014
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 11
Avg Rating: 64.8%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.04
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2014 Auto Bild 50 Summer Tire Shootout Auto Bild 2014 225/50 R17 48/50 0 metrics
All Tests
View Test Results
1
Tests
48th
Average
48th
Best
48th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
2014 Auto Bild 50 Summer Tire Shootout
225/50 R17 • 2014
48th/50

Questions and Answers for the Pace PC10

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Pace PC10. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Pace PC10 Reviews

Given 36% while driving a Volkswagen Passat B5 1.9 TDi (225/55 R17) on mostly town for 7,000 average miles
Just about the worst tires I have ever had. I bought cheap thinking they would be a good buy as I only used this car for short journeys. What a mistake. The sidewalls cracked within a few months, the steering was vague, the overall grip felt very uncomfortable, they were noisy and, eventually, I gave up when the tires caused so much road noise I thought the bearings were failing! Cheap but not a good buy at all.
Helpful 895
March 13, 2023
Given 83% while driving a (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 30,000 spirited miles
Long wearing overall good tire, very tough took a heap of extreme punishment.
Helpful 1025
August 22, 2020
Given 60% while driving a BMW 325i (225/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 4,000 spirited miles
Good dry grip and road manner, very low wear. Poor wet grip, oversteer easily, but predictable. Came with the car, but would choose something else to improve wet grip when they finally wear out. BMW 325ti.
Helpful 750
April 7, 2020

How would you rate the Pace PC10?

Click a star to start your review

207 reviews submitted this month Earn your Contributor badge No account needed

Latest Pace PC10 Reviews

Given 90% while driving a (225/45 R17) on for 0 miles
A great tire for the price great in the wet and lasted me 70000km`s without even rotating them (would have lasted allot longer if I wasnt lazy and rotated tem)
Helpful 553
September 30, 2017
Given 83% while driving a (205/55 R16) on for 0 miles
These were on the car when i bought it. 2008 Mercedes 200c kompressor 89000klm. Thought i would run them out and drop some Michelins on it. 107000klm on it. Pace pc10 still there. I drive long klm journeys and so far.... i am more then pleased.
Helpful 593
April 24, 2017
Check out how the BEST all seasons tires perform against premium summer and winter tires!
Given 81% while driving a Subaru 04 WRX (235/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 55,000 spirited miles
I was running achillies on my car and the wore terribly.
Went to pace tires as there were in the perfect price range for the value you get.
Very gripy in the dry.
For the price they are the perfect tire for all day use.
Will buy again and again.
Helpful 607
July 1, 2016
Given 73% while driving a Lexus GS300 (230/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 40 average miles
Extremely good tires for the price, could improve on road feedback and longevity but I would defiantly buy these again.
Helpful 556
June 30, 2016
Given 43% while driving a Toyota Camry (215/55 R17 V) on a combination of roads for 0 easy going miles
Had these on camry sportivo for 3 years and in that time i only did around 5,000km as it's not my daily drive. On dry it was not to bad but in the wet they are shocking.They would aquaplane at 110 kph on the freeway. Would i buy them again no. And i will not buy any more cheap tires for any of my cars.
Helpful 600
January 5, 2016
Given 46% while driving a Holden 2005 VZ SV6 (235/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 0 easy going miles
bought a new car and thought my tires needed a balance because between 90-100klm the steering wheel was shaking baddly.
thought i bought a dud until i put the Goodyear eagle F1's on now i love drivin my ute.
Helpful 582
April 1, 2015
Given 84% while driving a BMW 530 D Sport Touring (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 25,000 average miles
Got these Pace tires cheap as was going to sell my car. In the end I decided not to sell and was very impressed with these tires. My BMW is known for eating rear tires, but I got 22k miles out of the rears, the fronts still have 4mm left. (I got 10k out of the runflat dunlops I had previously!) The ratings (fuel econ & wet braking) for these PACE tires are higher than some of the premium brands and I can see why, they are better and a lot cheaper.
Helpful 681
February 14, 2015
Given 34% while driving a Ford Falcon Futura (235/35 R18) on a combination of roads for 2,000 easy going miles
These tires are crap soft and thin in the side walls. Under steer and over steer at the same time. they made my falcon steer like a dog spent thousands on my suspension to eliminate wondering tracking and numb road feel turns out that these tires had a major part to play in my bad steering. Only bought them because Phat wheels on the Sunshine Coast told me they were a good tire wont make that mistake again.
Helpful 573
November 24, 2014
Rate the Pace PC10