Performance Analysis
Across 10 tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 is a dominant track-day tire with exceptional dry performance and consistently high overall finishes (average position 1.5), frequently winning or placing top-2 in mixed UHP/track tests. It delivers class-leading dry braking and handling, and often tops dry laps even against other semi-slicks. However, its wet performance and aquaplaning resistance are recurrent weaknesses, and comfort/rolling resistance are secondary to its track focus.
In difficult, mixed-tire fields, the Cup 2 still secures overall wins by overwhelming dry pace despite clear wet and aquaplaning deficits. Pricing can be high, and subjective ABS activity can appear in heavy braking, reflecting a compound biased to longevity and track consistency rather than ultimate grip in all conditions.
Performance Strengths
-
Dry Performance
Strong
• 1st overall with 1st dry braking and 1st dry handling in 2020 Sport Auto 245/35 R19
• 1st dry handling in 2017 Sport Auto (87.1 km/h, fastest semi-slick)
• 2nd dry braking and 2nd dry handling in 2017 Auto Bild Track Day (within +2.9% and +0.3%)
• 1st dry handling lap pace vs PS4S/R888R/Goodyear cohort in 2021 (+1% from best)
• Multiple wins: 2018 Sport Auto (2nd dry braking +1.5%, 2nd dry handling +0.8%), 2024 GT3 RS test overall win despite mid-pack dry metrics
-
Overall Competitiveness/Awards
Strong
• Average overall position 1.5 across 10 tests
• Overall 1/10 (2020 Sport Auto), 1/9 (2018 Sport Auto), 1/6 (2024 GT3 RS), 1/5 (2017 Auto Bild), 1/2 (2020 Cup 2 vs Cup 2 R), 1/2 (2013 launch comparison), 2/10 (2020 Auto Bild), 2/8 (2015 Australian Motor)
-
Relative Wet Performance vs Track-Day Peers
Moderate
• 1st wet braking and 1st wet handling vs Cup 2 R in 2020 comparison
• 1st wet braking and 2nd wet handling among track-day tires in 2017 Auto Bild
• Wet handling 3/5 in 2024 GT3 RS (+3.1%)
-
Noise/Subjective Dry
Moderate
• 1st subjective dry handling in 2020 Sport Auto (12 pts)
• 2nd noise in 2020 Auto Bild (73 dB, +0.1% from best)
Performance Weaknesses
-
Wet Weather Performance
Strong
• 8/10 wet braking (+27.8%) and 8/10 wet handling (+8.2%) in 2020 Sport Auto; 9/10 wet circle (+11.9%)
• 9/10 wet braking (+22.5%) and 9/10 wet handling (+14.1%) in 2017 Sport Auto
• 9/10 wet braking (+22.3%) and 9/10 wet handling (+6.7%) in 2020 Auto Bild
• Wet braking 5/5 (+8.9%) in 2024 GT3 RS
-
Aquaplaning Resistance
Strong
• 10/10 straight aquaplaning (+11.9%) in 2020 Auto Bild
• 8/10 straight aquaplaning (+9%) and 9/10 wet circle (+11.9%) in 2020 Sport Auto
• 7/9 straight aquaplaning (+12.7%) in 2018 Sport Auto
-
Comfort and Efficiency
Moderate
• 10/10 subjective comfort (+40%) and 9/10 noise (72.8 dB, +2.8%) in 2020 Sport Auto
• Rolling resistance mid-to-poor: 8/10 (+12.6%) in 2020 Sport Auto; 7/10 (+13.2%) in 2020 Auto Bild; 6/9 (+7.6%) in 2018 Sport Auto
-
Price/Value
Strong
• 10/10 most expensive (+158.3%) in 2020 Auto Bild
• 9/9 most expensive (+177.6%) in 2018 Sport Auto
-
Dry Braking Consistency at Extreme Sizes
Minor
• 6/6 dry braking (+15.3%) in 2024 GT3 RS 335/30 R21
• 2/2 dry braking (+15.6%) vs Cup 2 R in 2020 comparison