Menu
Matador MP 62 All Weather Evo View Gallery (1)

Matador MP 62 All Weather Evo

Matador Tires Touring All Season

The Matador MP 62 All Weather Evo is a Touring All Season tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

5.7
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
73%
Wet Grip
58%
Road Feedback
53%
Handling
57%
Wear
60%
Comfort
60%
Buy again
45%
Snow Grip
70%
Ice Grip
60%
7 Reviews
60% Average
51,530 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 21st)
Matador MP 62 All Weather Evo

Matador MP 62 All Weather Evo

All Season Economy
BETA
5.7 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Category Scores
Wet
80
1.93x / 1 test
Dry
49.2
1.5x / 1 test
Cross-Category Performance

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
65.6
2 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 1
Publications: 1
Period: 2019
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 7
Avg Rating: 59.6%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 1.06
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2019 All Season Tire Performance Overview Auto Bild 2019 225/45 R17 21/31 2 metrics
All Tests
View Test Results
1
Tests
21st
Average
21st
Best
21st
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
2019 All Season Tire Performance Overview
225/45 R17 • 2019
21st/31
View Test Results

Questions and Answers for the Matador MP 62 All Weather Evo

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Matador MP 62 All Weather Evo. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Matador MP 62 All Weather Evo Reviews

Given 67% while driving a Skoda Yeti 4 x 4 (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 5,500 spirited miles
A generally good tire with good handling on dry and wet roads. Also good in snow with a 4x4 Skoda Yeti and on light off-road terrain. However, it's noisy on the road above 80 km/h. Finely treaded winter tires are much quieter! It might also depend on the suspension; next time I'll get a different all-weather tire.
Helpful 253
December 11, 2025
Given 63% while driving a Ford Fiesta (185/60 R14) on a combination of roads for 30,000 easy going miles
It's an okay tire overall. It is neither stiff nor soft, it handles okay but there is little feedback from the road. In wet conditions it could be a little better as the car understeers easily. In light snow and ice it's very good for an all weather tire. It has lasted 40000 km before it started to crack on the sidewalls . My only problem is that it can be very very noisy epsecially in high speed. I'm not gonna buy it again mainly for the rolling noise.
Helpful 897
December 1, 2022
Given 66% while driving a Citroën C4 (205/55 R16 V) on a combination of roads for 3,000 average miles
Performs good on dry and snow/ice. Expected more on wet roads but still ok for normal driving
Helpful 893
January 24, 2021

How would you rate the Matador MP 62 All Weather Evo?

Click a star to start your review

214 reviews submitted this month Earn your Contributor badge No account needed

Latest Matador MP 62 All Weather Evo Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 57% while driving a Toyota Corolla E140 (225/45 R17) on for 7,000 miles
I have driven a total of 7,000 km-spanning both summer and winter seasons-in a mix of city and highway conditions. In the summer heat, the road holding on long-distance trips was quite good. I also drove on wet, rainy roads; while the braking distance was reasonable, the tires didn't inspire confidence as speeds increased, so I slowed down. In winter, on icy surfaces, the braking performance at moderate speeds was good. My vehicle is a Toyota Corolla, and the tire noise is excessive.
Helpful 0
April 8, 2026
Ford (195/65 R15) on mostly town for 1,000 easy going miles
Good comfort, very soft tire, road feedback almost non existent, winter like profile should work in snow. Have been fited for 1000 miles in winter.
Helpful 888
January 27, 2021
Given 39% while driving a Peugeot 107 (155/65 R14 H) on mostly town for 30 average miles
Very bad on wet roads ture life to short 30.000 km
Helpful 797
December 9, 2020
Rate the Matador MP 62 All Weather Evo