11 tests, 2010 to 2014
- Test win
- Second
- Third
- Average 31%
Head-to-head record
Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the Kumho Ecsta KU39. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
| Rival | Shared tests | Ahead | Behind | Level | Finished ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 0 | 7 | - | 0% | |
| 6 | 3 | 3 | - | 50% | |
| 6 | 2 | 4 | - | 33% | |
| 6 | 2 | 4 | - | 33% | |
| 6 | 1 | 5 | - | 17% | |
| 6 | 0 | 6 | - | 0% | |
| 5 | 0 | 5 | - | 0% | |
| 5 | 0 | 5 | - | 0% | |
| 5 | 0 | 5 | - | 0% | |
| 4 | 2 | 2 | - | 50% | |
| 4 | 1 | 3 | - | 25% | |
| 4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% | |
| 4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% | |
| 4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% | |
| 4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% | |
| 3 | 3 | 0 | - | 100% | |
| 3 | 3 | 0 | - | 100% | |
| 3 | 2 | 1 | - | 67% | |
| 3 | 2 | 1 | - | 67% | |
| 3 | 1 | 2 | - | 33% |
Performance Analysis
Drawn from 11 tests. Updated October 29, 2026.
The Kumho Ecsta KU39 generally placed in the lower half across 11 tests, with steering feel and wear the clearest recurring criticisms. It was 15th of 15 in the 2012 Auto Bild Max Performance Tire Test, where comfort was the positive but steering, braking, fuel consumption and wear disappointed. It also finished 11th of 11 in the 2011 AMS Ultra High Performance Tire Test. Its 8th-of-15 finish in the 2014 Auto Bild Top 15 Summer Tire Test was better, with praise for aquaplaning, dry braking, pass-by noise and value, but poor mileage and slow steering remained concerns.
Braking and wet performance vary. The short dry stops praised by Auto Bild in 2014 are unusual beside its long dry and wet stops in 2012. EVO’s 2012 Summer Tire Test, in 225/45 R17, found relatively strong wet performance despite 9th of 10 overall; its separate 235/40 R18 Max Performance test also placed it 9th of 10 but criticised wet grip. ADAC placed it 10th of 19 in the 2013 European Summer Sports Tire Test and noted a slight wet weakness. No award is recorded. The record supports some comfort, noise and value appeal, without consistent braking, wet grip or precise steering across sizes and tests.
Performance Strengths
-
Ride comfort
Minor
in 1 of 5 tests
Details
- Good comfort praised, 2012 Auto Bild Max Performance Tire Test
Good comfort
- 2012 Auto Bild Max Performance Tire Test (2012)
-
Road noise
Minor
in 1 of 5 tests
Details
- Quiet pass-by noise praised, 2014 Auto Bild Top 15 Summer Tire Test
quiet pass-by noise
- 2014 Auto Bild Top 15 Summer Tire Test (2014)
-
Aquaplaning resistance
Minor
in 1 of 5 tests
Details
- Good aquaplaning results praised, 2014 Auto Bild Top 15 Summer Tire Test
Good aquaplaning results
- 2014 Auto Bild Top 15 Summer Tire Test (2014)
-
Value for money
Minor
in 1 of 5 tests
Details
- Good value praised, 2014 Auto Bild Top 15 Summer Tire Test
good value for money
- 2014 Auto Bild Top 15 Summer Tire Test (2014)
Performance Weaknesses
-
Steering feel
Strong
in 3 of 5 tests
Details
- Slow response, 2014 Auto Bild Top 15 Summer Tire Test
- Dull, light steering, 2012 EVO Summer Tire Test
- Poor steering feel, 2012 Auto Bild Max Performance Tire Test
slow steering response
- 2014 Auto Bild Top 15 Summer Tire Test (2014)dull light steering feel give the Kumho a poor subjective score overall
- 2012 EVO Summer Tire Test (2012)Poor steering feel
- 2012 Auto Bild Max Performance Tire Test (2012)
-
Tread life
Strong
in 2 of 5 tests
Details
- Poor mileage, 2014 Auto Bild Top 15 Summer Tire Test
- Poor wear, 2012 Auto Bild Max Performance Tire Test
Poor mileage
- 2014 Auto Bild Top 15 Summer Tire Test (2014)poor wear
- 2012 Auto Bild Max Performance Tire Test (2012)
-
Wet grip
Minor
in 2 of 5 tests
Details
- Slight wet weakness, 2013 ADAC European Summer Sports Tire Test
- Weak wet performance in the 2012 EVO Max Performance test, unusually contrasting with relatively strong wet performance in EVO’s separate 2012 Summer test
A little weak in the wet
- 2013 European Summer Sports Tire Test (2013)struggled in the wet
- 2012 EVO Max Performance Tire Test (2012)
Do owners agree with the tests?
Every tester write-up on the Kumho Ecsta KU39 (5 tests) and 114 owner reviews were tagged for the aspects they judge. Where both have spoken, this is how they line up.
Where owners and testers agree
- Road noise strength in 1 of 5 tests 39 praise, 9 criticise of 114 reviews · Read those reviews
- Ride comfort strength in 1 of 5 tests 31 praise, 4 criticise of 114 reviews · Read those reviews
- Value for money strength in 1 of 5 tests 29 praise, 3 criticise of 114 reviews · Read those reviews
Where they disagree
- Tread life weakness in 2 of 5 tests 28 praise, 12 criticise of 114 reviews · Read those reviews
- Steering feel weakness in 3 of 5 tests 14 praise, 2 criticise of 114 reviews · Read those reviews
- Wet braking weakness in 1 of 5 tests 8 praise, 0 criticise of 114 reviews · Read those reviews
Raised by owners, not by any test of this tire
- Dry handling no test mentions it 20 praise, 5 criticise of 114 reviews · Read those reviews
- Behavior at the limit no test mentions it 8 praise, 3 criticise of 114 reviews · Read those reviews
- Wet handling no test mentions it 8 praise, 3 criticise of 114 reviews · Read those reviews
Every test, newest first 11
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
2012 EVO Summer Tire Test
Much closer to the tires above rather than the Nexen below, the Kumho had a relatively strong wet performance. Slow in the dry, and a dull light steering feel give the Kumho a poor subjective score overall
2012 Auto Bild Max Performance Tire Test
Poor steering feel, long wet and dry braking, high fuel consumption, poor wear.
2012 EVO Max Performance Tire Test
A very average performance from the Kumho KU39 left Kumhos flagship tire in 9th. Like the Accelera in 10th, the Kumho was ok in the dry, but struggled in the wet.
2011 AMS Ultra High Performance Tire Test
No comments
Back to the Kumho Ecsta KU39 overview
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Kumho tires

