Menu

Hankook Dynapro M/T

The Hankook Dynapro MT is a All Terrain and Off Road All Season tire designed to be fitted to SUV and 4x4s.

6.4
Tire Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
83%
Wet Grip
75%
Road Feedback
70%
Handling
68%
Wear
83%
Comfort
58%
Buy again
75%
Snow Grip
85%
Ice Grip
65%
5 Reviews
73% Average
81,060 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 5th)
Hankook Dynapro MT

Hankook Dynapro MT

All Season Premium
BETA
6.4 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 1
Publications: 1
Period: 2016
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 5
Avg Rating: 73.3%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 2.56
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2016 All Terrain and Off Road MT Tire Test Drive Out 2016 265/75 R16 5/10 0 metrics
1
Tests
5th
Average
5th
Best
5th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
The Korean company continues to impress - their tires performed well in the last two tests, and that says a consistently high quality of their products. This time, Hankook impressed on the asphalt and gravel, and if not for the relatively low strength of the sidewalls, they would have taken a place among the leaders of this test.

Questions and Answers for the Hankook Dynapro MT

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Hankook Dynapro MT. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Hankook Dynapro MT Reviews

Given 42% while driving a Holden Colorado Utility (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 34,000 spirited miles
Great tire, when new. Mine are now 2 years old and I'm not sure what's gone on but I think the compound has hardened. Whilst tire life (in terms of kms) is great, they are now down right dangerous in the wet. Understeering on damp roads, the back now steps out around every corner at slow speeds, I am not game to try at high speeds. Will not buy again.
June 15, 2019
Given 86% while driving a Ford Expedition (285/75 R16) on mostly country roads for 17,000 spirited miles
I have been running 285/75/R16 Hankook Dynapro MT tires on my 2.7 ton 1997 Ford Expedition for 5 years now. Almost immediately after buying them, I had the tires siped i.e. cuts about 5-7mm deep made with about 5mm step onto the tire (the edges of the tread were not cut to maintain good directional habits for the tire). In summer, the grip was awesome compared to street or All Terrain, in some situation where the former tires warranted 4wd, the Dynapro Mud Terrain was still good in 2wd, especially on grass or gravel. In shallow mud, the 4wd made the vehicle unstoppable. On streets I essentially got the stability of a train. Not kidding, my record for the vehicle keeping a lane without me touching the wheel at 40mph is about 2.8km. No problems on tram lines, no issues when tracks have been worn into the asphalt. I have never managed to get these tires to aquaplane, no matter the speed or rainfall. I can also ignore all speed bumps and humps. I can still tell what each of my wheels are doing and can still feel the paint on the pavement through the tires and suspension Traction on snow and ice was markedly improved after getting the tires siped. I did, and now I've been running siped tires for 5 winters in Eastern Europe. Works perfectly well in loose on in packed snow, even on ice, albeit better in 4wd. It have even used the car to pull trees from the forest in deep snow. In the same snow a Subaru XV on regular Nordic winter tires had real trouble. One year in snowy conditions I briefly had one of the tires on the rear axle siped while the other was not siped, The result was that I was only able to move in 2wd thanks to the limited slip in the rear, so great was the difference in traction between siped and unsiped. Siping is absolutely necessary to run these tires in snow, on ice and generally in winter. The main downsides are fuel economy and noise. I went from 17.5L/100km to 20L/100km in city by switching from 265/70R17 street tires to these. The tires are most economical at or below 50 mph. At 75-80 the fuel economy rises to 20L/100km on highway. As for noise, similar numbers apply. For newer tires with more tread, about 50mph is the maximum you want to do. With more wear 55-60mph can be tolerated. Beyond 65mph the noise becomes deafening. Overall, I think for general purpose and off road, this tire size and this tire in particular is perfect for this vehicle, or a vehicle in similar size or weight. I now have about 25k kilometers on the tires and I can see them lasting at least 15k more before they lose their good traction in snow and muddy off road.
June 4, 2020
Given 79% while driving a Holden Rodeo Dual Cab 4x4 Ute 3ltr TD Auto (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 30,000 spirited miles
I've been driving 4x4's now for over 25 years (about 2 million K's) and usually ONLY use BFG's as here in OZ, if your Tire fails you, you may die out there...
Something to think about?
As this is just a "work" truck I decided mainly on price at the time to get these Hankook MT's

I am impressed with the lack of noise, the wet and dry grip on bitumen is amazing and the life seems very good too.
I've done 40,000klm so far with about 20,000klm left in them and that's very good considering how heavily loaded the Ute is, and how hard I drive it... "After all, Time is Money"

Would I recommend these MT's. Absolutely. An outstanding Tire for the money.

Have a nice Day.

From the Land of OZ.
May 5, 2017

How would you rate the Hankook Dynapro MT?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Hankook Dynapro MT Reviews

Given 91% while driving a Chevrolet Suburban (285/70 R17) on mostly motorways for 60 average miles
I bought a set of the hankook dynapro mt tires in Feb of 2012, I run them on a 04 1/2 ton 2wd suburban with a locker. I have gotten good traction all around, on the road, off the road. I rotate them every 5000 miles when I do my oil change. I am currently running the same tires with with an estimated 5-10,000 miles left to go worth of tread. Currently have over 60,000 miles on them. Starting to get a little uneven wear....But wow! These tires where Worth the $200 a piece I paid for them. I would definitely buy them again.
February 20, 2017
(265/75 R16) on for 0 miles
use 265x16hankook dynapro mt on 4x4permanent landcruiserstationwagon 66%tared road 33% gravel road loaded average at least 50 %. Still get slow punctures on running surface of tires ,not on sidewalls, and always backtires (4×4 traction) . Highly improvement compared to other used before. Dry / wet grip handles good. +_ 30 000km now and patern still ok. Hope that if the new sealguard-technology by roboter coated inside rubbermass on runningsurface is implemented by hankook
have this problem also sorted out. Seen the many using these tires it is worthwile trying .





August 26, 2016
Check out how the BEST all seasons tires perform against premium summer and winter tires!
Rate the Hankook Dynapro MT