Menu

GT Radial CHAMPIRO SX2

The GT Radial CHAMPIRO SX2 is a Extreme Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

7.5
Tire Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
88%
Wet Grip
63%
Road Feedback
81%
Handling
87%
Wear
69%
Comfort
65%
Buy again
86%
20 Reviews
77% Average
136,010 miles driven
GT-Radial CHAMPIRO SX2

GT-Radial CHAMPIRO SX2

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
7.5 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 20
Avg Rating: 76.8%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.16
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tire tests for the GT Radial CHAMPIRO SX2

Size Fuel Wet Noise
16 inch
205/50R16 87 V D C 69
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the GT Radial CHAMPIRO SX2 >>

Questions and Answers for the GT Radial CHAMPIRO SX2

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the GT Radial CHAMPIRO SX2. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Size Price Range  
195/50 R15 $117.00 - $117.99 (2 Prices) Compare Prices >>
225/45 R17 $143.00 - $143.00 (1 Price) Compare Prices >>
245/40 R17 $144.00 - $144.00 (1 Price) Compare Prices >>
245/40 R18 $171.00 - $171.00 (1 Price) Compare Prices >>
Available in 9 tire sizes - View all.

Top 3 GT Radial CHAMPIRO SX2 Reviews

Given 73% while driving a BMW 330i (225/45 R18) on mostly town for 300 average miles
Very good tire, not comfortable for street driving as it is erratic on uneven roads.
April 16, 2025
Given 77% while driving a Volkswagen Scirocco 1,4 TSI 160hp (235/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 7,000 spirited miles
much better than i expected. amazing value for money. they look amazing, fat and thick. they’re decent for daily use. no where near as loud as i expected on the highway. the dry grip is excellent once the tires are warm and they provide really good feedback on the limit. i know exactly when im losing grip. wet grip isn’t great though but i expected that. keep it below 100kmh on the highway when it rains and you’ll be fine but sometimes you do feel it hydroplane especially when switching lanes. overall a very good tire priced very well.
August 21, 2025
Given 74% while driving a Honda Fit (Jazz) (195/50 R15) on a combination of roads for 10,000 average miles
Suprisingly good on dry traction and wear. Keep it well inflated and ensure camber bolts are in the front keeping at least -1.2° and the tires will last better than RE003. Wet traction is average and tire feedback is weak. You don't know when you will lose grip.
March 29, 2023

How would you rate the GT Radial CHAMPIRO SX2?

Click a star to start your review

Latest GT Radial CHAMPIRO SX2 Reviews

Given 74% while driving a Toyota 2022 GR86 (225/45 R17) on track for 7,500 average miles
I bought these as novice track tires, I have done 3 track days with them. I have also been using them for daily driving and a couple road trips this summer. Overall I cannot recommend these enough to other people who are also new to track driving. They aren't really fast tires and don't have the most grip, but they do an amazing job communicating to you exactly when the car is going to break loose. They squeal really loudly when you're driving at the limit of your grip and have nice wide slip angles. They are also pretty durable, I can definitely get several more track days out of them. As far as daily driving goes, they're totally fine. They aren't wearing fast, especially when compared to grippier track tires, and the comfort is also fine. They're perfectly safe to drive in the rain as long as you're driving like a normal person.
September 22, 2022
Given 67% while driving a Honda Fit (Jazz) (195/55 R15) on a combination of roads for 1,200 spirited miles
Been using these for a few months now, mostly for daily driving but i also sometimes did some hard touge driving on the weekends, here are my thoughts : 1. Dry grip : it's about the same level as your typical Michelin Pilot Sport 4 which is a little bit disappointing for a "200TW extreme performance track tire", i was expecting atleast Pilot 4S kind of grip. 2. Wet grip : decent, no issues with aquaplanning but it does have some slight understeer here and there. 3. Road feedback : good, you could feel even the tiny bumps through the steering wheel. 4. Handling : very predictable, you'll know exactly what the car's gonna do, whether it'll do an understeer or oversteer. 5. Wear : I don't know about the wear yet but some guys on the forum said that these tires are really durable. 6. Comfort : Don't buy this if you wanted comfort since the sidewall is quite stiff and the noise is stupid loud, especially on the highway. 7. Buy again : Overall it's a pretty good tire for the price and what they are. For street use, they have more grip than you need and on the touge it's very predictable and will take some spirited driving abuse. I like them so far, definitely gonna buy again.
August 6, 2022
Check out how the BEST all seasons tires perform against premium summer and winter tires!
Given 70% while driving a Honda Jazz (195/50 R15) on a combination of roads for 300 spirited miles
Very planted on road when dry. Wet handling is OK but not good for fast drive. Comparable to RE003.
May 24, 2022
Given 71% while driving a Fiat Punto GT turbo (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 8,000 spirited miles
Tires was kidna expensive for 195/50r15 (paid 400€). Very Good Grip on dry for the first 1.5-2 years and about 4000km. Stiff sidewalls good for cornering, bit stiff for city driving with potholes.... Noise a little bit more but nothing crazy. I was expecting a lot more with this kind of treadpattern and driving orientation. Then its like you turned a switch and became mediocore after two years. Wear was fast. It caught me off guard when i checked. I hit the wear limit markers on 9000km for the fronts. Sidewalls start cracking and got sidewall bulges for no particular reason. I think they are unsafe in this kind of condition. On mild wet they were very good for some reason. it hooked like it was a winter tire. Maybe because of the soft compound. Never went out in downpour rain though. Also i met wet roads mostly on the first year of having them
November 14, 2021
Given 72% while driving a Mazda Mazda Miata (/50 R15) on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
These are my first 200tw tires, and they're eye opening. On the street, these things are nuts. If you're sliding these on the street, you're driving way too fast. They just seem to grip. I've also run these in a few autocross events. I think they could use more grip here, as always. I think they're a little off of "real" 200tw tires, but I also don't have any experience driving with them so not 100% sure. In the wet, the champiros are pretty good so long as they stay in contact with the ground. With other all seasons and mild summer tires in light rain I could easily break traction in aggressive street driving. The Champiros don't have this issue at all. Full throttle in first and second is rock solid. However, they do seem to hydroplane easier. So watch out for standing water. I haven't driven in a wet autocross or track day so I cannot rate that aspect. Wear seems fine so far. I've put a couple thousand miles and ~5 autocross events and they seem to take it well. I payed $80 a tire (pre tax and install), so for the price I'm very happy. I do want to try other tires in this 200tw category so I probably won't personally buy these again. But if you're looking for the next level up from street tires or a cheap way to get into the street autocross classes, go for it.
October 1, 2021
Given 66% while driving a Honda CIVIC 1.6 VTEC (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 7,000 average miles
noisier if used for daily,
July 9, 2021
Given 77% while driving a Mitsubishi Evolution (225/45 R17 W) on mostly motorways for 1,000 spirited miles
Running in an Evo3 with 400whp. Dry grip is the party piece for this tire. Definitely still a road tire that can go on track. The dry grip is high. Easily measuring up to Advans, Toyo's or Michelins Pilot Sports. All of which I've had. It will need heat to achieve full grip. On the road, you need to be aware of this. Cold, the brake distances are much longer. But once up to temp, they do stop quite well. Wet handling is not as bad as others might make it to be. But it will aquaplane and you need to be alert. This is not too surprising as the pattern design looks more sport tire than road tire. The blocks are quite big and the grooves are not very deep. These are the same reason it handles well, grips well, good in transitions, the side-walls are stiff. Wear is a let down though. I noticed spirited driving will wear it down quicker than the Advans, Michelins. But for the price--it is a good choice.
September 23, 2020
Given 86% while driving a Honda Jazz (195/50 R15) on mostly town for 100 spirited miles
so much better than achilles 123s, i was using 123s and this tires are so much less noisy and much comfortable than 123s for daily driven car.
September 20, 2020
Given 73% while driving a Volkswagen Golf Mk6 1.4 TSI 160 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 40,000 spirited miles
They've got an impressive grip on dry tarmac with quite a good feedback through the steering wheel. You can tell what the tires are doing, whether understeering or oversteering. They're cheap compare to similar tires from Michelin PS4 or Bridgestone Potenza S007. The wet weather performance isn't that great, but when they do aquaplane, the tires will give you plenty of warning and quite controllable. However, if you use these tires in tarmac with a lot of dust or gravel, they will be very slippery. Golf with only around 200hp was lighting up its traction control because the tires couldn't get much grip. If you use these on the track, you need to give them some temperature as they're slippery when cold, but when the temp had come up to their operating window, they're quite sticky. Track use, they will last longer than PS4, more durable. Road use, they will have uneven wear and the middle part of the groves cave in (probably because of pressure or maybe the tires couldn't get enough temp into it) and they will start cracking after 3 years. Don't expect much from comfort because they have stiff sidewall and you could lean on the grip of the tire when the condition is right.
September 19, 2020
Given 76% while driving a Peugeot 106 s16 (195/50 R15 W) on mostly country roads for 8,000 spirited miles
Used them in my daily 106 s16, from everyday use to spirited country road driving they perform very well considering their track oriented character! Wet handling was unexpectedly good, something that was bothering me when i mounted them. Of course hydroplaning is not their best and attention is needed especially with lightweight vehicles.
Their downside is that they wont last long like a normal tire, in everyday use but thats not enough for not buying them again!
March 1, 2019
Given 86% while driving a Honda Civic Type R (225/40 R18 W) on mostly town for 10 average miles
Comparable to the rest tires in their price,are the best by far!
November 26, 2017
Given 81% while driving a Mazda 3 2014 (245/40 R18 W) on track for 10,000 spirited miles
This is my 2nd daily set already. Ran these on a race-prepped Honda Integra DC2, and a Honda Civic EG for an 8 and 6 hour endurance race respectively. We ran the race flat out and still have 60-70% tread left.

Also have a set on my Mazda 3 as my daily which i regularly track as well.

Running on 245/40/18
Good:
- RE11 levels of grip
- cheap
- good feedback at the limit
- hard sidewall
- CRAZY CHEAP

Bad
- Noisy on the highway
- average performance on the wet
- aquaplanes easily
August 16, 2017
Rate the GT Radial CHAMPIRO SX2