“225 55 19 Bridgestone Etopia ep422 plus These tires came on my new 2022 Ford Escape as an upgrade. Handled well in all weather, good fuel mileage. Had to replace all four by 50,000 kms. By 40,000 kms started getting...”
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 plus
The Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 plus is a touring summer tire with a comfortable ride and low fuel consumption in owner reports. Wet grip, limited handling when pushed, disappointing wear and increasing noise are recurring concerns.
The quick answer
Built from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold for this tire - the evidence is all further down the page. Data updated September 2026.
- 13owner reviews
- 199,890miles driven
All Tests
Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tire tests for the Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 plus
Dimensions & Label Scores
View AllSize Range2 sizes available
195-205Width60Profile16-17Rim90-96 H-VLoad/
EU LabelAcross 2 sizes - the grade depends on the size you buy.
Fuel
Wet
Noise
69-71dB B
Frequently Asked Questions
How many miles does the Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 plus last?
What do owners say about the Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 plus?
What is the Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 plus's EU tire label rating?
How comfortable and quiet are the Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 plus?
How well do the Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 plus wear, according to owners?
More questions about the Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 plus (2)
Would owners buy the Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 plus again?
What sizes does the Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 plus come in?
Owner Questions
Ask a questionQuestions and Answers for the Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 plus
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 plus Owner Reviews
Review this tireWhat owners say summarised from 12 reviews
Owners of the Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 plus most often praise its comfortable ride and low fuel consumption rather than outright grip. Wet grip is criticised in around one in three reviews, while roughly one in four finds dry handling limited when pushed. Longer-term accounts lean towards disappointing tread life, with about one in three reviews raising wear concerns despite some much longer-lasting sets. A similar share describes noise increasing as the tire ages. With only twelve reviews and no repeat reviewers, the accounts support a comfort and economy bias but do not establish a typical mileage or a uniform rate of decline.
What owners mention most counted across 12 reviews
Tap one to read only the reviews that mention it.
Owner ratings averaged from 13 ratings
- Owner score 54%
- Comfort 63%
- Dry Grip 60%
- Wet Grip 58%
- Handling 54%
- Road Feedback 53%
- Wear 52%
Featured reviews
“These crappy tires came with my camry se 2023 and to be honest with you they are the worst car tires i have ever owned on any cars i have owned. They slips on dry roads ON DRY ROADS!! dont even get me started on wet...”
“came as OE on my 2020 Mazda cx9 - reviewing at 85.000 km rn Average tire with some strong points and weaknesses, pros: -Long treadwear life, tire can survive another 15000 km easily. -Managed to survive Saudi Arabian...”
All 12 Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 plus reviews
- Mitsubishi Outlander
- 255/45 R20
- 28,000 miles
I drive conservatively but still found these tires reach their limit easily. Especially when worn, they would squeal during tight turns, even when going slowly like in a car park.
They were quite comfortable but became very loud as they wore down especially above 80km/h.
My set were OE for my PHEV Outlander and were worn to .5mm of the indicator within 45,000km/28,000mi. I could maybe have babied them to 50,000km with a rotation around 30,000km.
These are not off road oriented tires, but I drive on dirt roads multiple times a week. They gave good confidence when new, but became slippery on dirt roads as they began to wear.
It may be due to the low profile of my tires (255/45/20) but I damaged 3 wheels from potholes in their short life.
Overall I was quite disappointed in these tires, they were quite decent early on, but wore out quickly and became increasing bad in multiple ways as they wore down. I was excited to replace them and would recommend replacement with something else if your vehicle comes with these, even if you haven’t reached the tread wear marker yet.
- Volkswagen Jetta 1.4 TSI
- 205/60 R16
- 33,694 miles
- Mostly Motorways
- Spirited
Comfort is the greatest strength of the Ecopia EP422+ with a compliant feel, excellent damping, and very low rolling noise. There is minor impact boom, but that is the only flaw with this tire's comfort on the Jetta. I have learned with other tires purchased for this car its comfort is a sensitive balance, so the excellent comfort alone makes the Ecopia EP422+ a great match to the car.
Steering response is also good - not too quick but linear and very predictable. Straight ahead tracking is good and compliments the comfortable character. There is nothing sporty about this car and tire combination, but the tire and suspension respond proportionally to each other and provide good cornering confidence. It has enough dry grip for a commuter car on the street, I think more dry grip would simply overwhelm the car's soft suspension tuning and produce more understeer.
Wet grip is a weak point with poor acceleration traction, but acceptable lateral traction. There is enough grip for the car to feel stable and predictable in wet conditions, but the low longitudinal traction is not confidence inspiring. This disappointing wet grip led me to look for alternatives when replacing these Ecopia EP422+ tires, but both options I have tried came with other compromises in steering feel and comfort that I do not think are worth the improved wet grip.
I have winter tires for this car and only had a few experiences unintentionally with snow conditions on these tires. They had notably weak snow traction, but handling was manageable enough to get home safely. I would never choose this tire to use in winter, it is best treated as a 3 season tire and would be quite tiring to drive in the snow on a regular basis.
At 33k miles I had 3-4/32nds left and felt wet grip had become poor enough to justify replacing these tires. Up to 30,000 miles the comfort remained strong, but there was more impact noise and harshness in the final 3000 miles before I replaced these tires. In hindsight however, this degraded comfort level was still better than 2 of the 3 sets of tires I have had on the car after the original Ecopia EP422+. Only the Continental VikingContact 7 has matched the comfort of the Ecopia EP422+. I will most likely get the Ecopia EP422+ again when I am ready for the next set of 3 season tires for the Jetta.
- Ford Escape
- 225/55 R19
- Mostly Motorways
- Average
Which tires do you drive?
Researching the Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 plus? Rate the tires you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.
- Honda CRV
- 235/60 R18
- 28 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Toyota
- 205/55 R17
- Mostly Town
- Easy Going
The positives are:
- They are wonderfully comfortable, driving at a steady pace on the highway is very pleasant. They soak small bumps and they are quiet, both inside and out.
- The rolling resistance is very low, I can achieve 3.7L/100Km on average on each refile.
The negatives are:
- The dry grip & handling is good so long you don't push the tires. If you try to have fun at a country road, the tires reach their limit fast and the grip is lowering. The dry breaking is average, the ABS kicks in very often and the stopping distance is above average with the quality of the asphalt contributing to shorter or longer breaking. If you push the tires they tend to be numb, by that I mean that you initiate the turn - the wheels turn - the car turns - and lastly you get the feedback on the steering that you start to turn.
- The wet grip, breaking and aqua planning resistance are bad. Comparing the Falken Sincera (165/60/16), Bridgestone WeatherControl A005 (205/55/17) and Dunlop Sport All Season (205/55/17) I've tried they resist aqua planning till 145Km/h with heavy rain and deep water puddles, were the Ecopia become unstable at 110Km/h.
- Compare to other Bridgestone tires these started to crack at the outside at 10,000km and now at 21,000km they've cracked both inside and out even though the tread depth is high.
Would I buy them again? If it was just the overall handling against the low rolling resistance perhaps I would think about it, but considering they've cracked quite soon...I won't and I can't say I'd recommend them.
- Subaru
- 225/60 R17
- Mostly Town
- Average
- Toyota Camry
- 215/55 R17
- 5,400 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
- Mitsubishi ASX Outlander Sport
- 225/55 R18
- 68 miles
- Mostly Country Roads
- Average
- Mazda CX9
- 255/50 R20
- 60,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
- Nissan Note
- /65 R15
- 12,700 miles
- Mostly Town
- Average
- Honda Civic
- /65 R15
- 15,000 miles
- Mostly Town
- Spirited
- Mazda CX9
- 255/50 R20
- 5,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
weeks latere I was able to drive an exactly same suv but with the falken tires ( OE as well) and realized how much I was loosing with the bridgestone option, the suv was taughter, more responsive , the cuves could be taken in a much sportier way.
one thing that I really don't like about the bridgestone is that every time you get into a curve , even if you are not going fast the tire sounds quite loud , not a screech sound, just like if u had saddenly gotten into a more abrasive road.
so at the end this is a tire that I wouldn't buy again and to the mazda ppl, this tire isn't what the cx9 needs to show its potential.
No reviews match those filters.
Find your next tire
All tire testsThe latest Tire Reviews tests
- Oct 2026The BEST All Weather Tires for 2026/27 →
- Oct 2026All Season vs All Terrain Tires Tested: Do You Actually Need an All Terrain? →
- Oct 2026The BEST Winter Tires for 2026/27 →
Summer Tires
All Season Tires
Winter Tires
SUV and All Terrain Tires
Track Tires
Which tires do you drive?
You're reading real-world reviews from other drivers - add yours and help the next buyer choose the right tires.







