10 tests, 2010 to 2018
- Test win
- Second
- Third
- Average 51%
Head-to-head record
Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the Barum Brillantis 2. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
| Rival | Shared tests | Ahead | Behind | Level | Finished ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 4 | 3 | - | 57% | |
| 6 | 2 | 4 | - | 33% | |
| 5 | 4 | 1 | - | 80% | |
| 5 | 1 | 4 | - | 20% | |
| 5 | 0 | 5 | - | 0% | |
| 4 | 2 | 2 | - | 50% | |
| 4 | 2 | 2 | - | 50% | |
| 4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% | |
| 4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% | |
| 4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% | |
| 4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% | |
| 3 | 3 | 0 | - | 100% | |
| 3 | 3 | 0 | - | 100% | |
| 3 | 3 | 0 | - | 100% | |
| 3 | 2 | 1 | - | 67% | |
| 3 | 1 | 2 | - | 33% | |
| 3 | 1 | 2 | - | 33% | |
| 3 | 1 | 2 | - | 33% | |
| 3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% | |
| 3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% |
Against its own line
The same record for the tire it replaced and the tire that replaced it.
| Tire | Tests | Wins | Avg finish | Field beaten |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barum Brillantis Predecessor | 0 | - | - | - |
| Barum Brillantis 2 This tire | 10 | 0 | 11th | 51% |
Performance Analysis
Drawn from 10 tests. Updated October 29, 2026.
The Barum Brillantis 2 generally finished around the middle of its summer test fields, but its strengths changed with year and size. ADAC placed it fifth of 15 in 165/70 R14 in 2012 and described it as balanced across safety tests. It was ninth of 16 in 2014, 11th of 19 in 2013 and 11th of 16 in 2016. Auto Bild's braking overviews put it 12th of 50 in 2012, 20th of 54 in 2015 and 21st of 51 in 2018; those overall places do not identify individual braking distances.
There are unusual reversals in the testers' judgements. ADAC praised dry performance in 2011, but found a slight dry weakness in 2013 and 2014. Wet performance was good in 2013 and acceptable in 2014, whereas ADAC noted wet weaknesses in 2011 and 2016. In ACE's 2016 mid-range comparison it finished sixth of ten overall, with the article describing a better showing in the wet than the dry. Wear was also inconsistent: ADAC criticised slightly higher wear in 2014 but praised low wear in 2016. The record therefore supports a generally middling assessment, with meaningful variation rather than one dependable grip or wear advantage.
Performance Strengths
-
Wet grip
Minor
in 1 of 1 tests
Details
- ADAC 2013 praised good wet performance; ADAC 2014 called it acceptable.
- ACE 2016 described a better wet than dry showing; unusually, ADAC 2011 and 2016 found wet weaknesses.
Acceptable performance on wet roads
- 2014 ADAC 175/65 R14 Summer Tire Test (2014)
Performance Weaknesses
-
Dry grip
Minor
in 1 of 1 tests
Details
- ADAC 2013 and 2014 found slight dry-road weaknesses.
- Unusually, ADAC 2011 praised dry performance and ADAC 2012 described balanced safety results.
Slight weakness on dry roads
- 2014 ADAC 175/65 R14 Summer Tire Test (2014)
-
Tread life
Minor
in 1 of 1 tests
Details
- ADAC 2014 criticised slightly higher wear.
- Unusually, ADAC 2016 praised low wear, so this was not consistent.
slightly higher wear
- 2014 ADAC 175/65 R14 Summer Tire Test (2014)
Every test, newest first 10
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
Back to the Barum Brillantis 2 overview
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Barum tires

