HT vs AT vs MT vs Winter Tires on Snow

Below are all the data points for the HT vs AT vs MT vs Winter Tires on Snow, displaying how each tire performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tire's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

General Grabber Arctic
General Grabber HTS60
General Grabber APT
General Grabber ATx
General Grabber X3

Quick Navigation

Snow Performance Overview

Snow Braking (M)

Snow braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was General Grabber Arctic with a result of 18.2 M. The difference between best and worst was 20.9%.

Snow Traction (s)

Snow acceleration time (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was General Grabber Arctic with a result of 6.5 s. The difference between best and worst was 39.3%.

Snow Handling (s)

Snow handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was General Grabber Arctic with a result of 84.96 s. The difference between best and worst was 11%.

Subj. Snow Handling ( Points)

Subjective Snow Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was General Grabber Arctic with a result of 10 Points. The difference between best and worst was 40%.

Ice Performance Overview

Ice Braking (M)

Ice braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was General Grabber Arctic with a result of 14.4 M. The difference between best and worst was 20.4%.

Comfort Performance Overview

Subj. Comfort ( Points)

Subjective Comfort Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was General Grabber Arctic with a result of 10 Points. The difference between best and worst was 30%.

Subj. Noise ( Points)

Subjective in car noise levels (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was General Grabber HTS60 with a result of 10 Points. The difference between best and worst was 40%.

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tire Score
1 General Grabber Arctic 0%
2 General Grabber HTS60 0%
3 General Grabber APT 0%
4 General Grabber ATx 0%
5 General Grabber X3 0%
comments powered by Disqus