Menu

Test Charts / ADAC

2026 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 185/65 R15

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
185/65 R15
Tires tested
16
Disciplines
13
Test vehicle
Skoda Fabia

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

1

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
142 ft Best 0 mph
144 ft +2 ft 9 mph
145 ft +3 ft 11 mph
145 ft +3 ft 12 mph
145 ft +3 ft 12 mph
146 ft +4 ft 13 mph
146 ft +4 ft 13 mph
146 ft +4 ft 14 mph
147 ft +5 ft 15 mph
148 ft +6 ft 16 mph
148 ft +6 ft 16 mph
151 ft +9 ft 20 mph
152 ft +10 ft 20 mph
152 ft +10 ft 21 mph
156 ft +14 ft 24 mph
159 ft +17 ft 26 mph

The difference between best and worst was 11.8% (17 ft ≈ 1.1 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Viking WinTech NewGen would still be travelling at 26 mph when the Linglong Sport Master Winter had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet

4

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (50 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
110 ft Best 0 mph
116 ft +6 ft 18 mph
118 ft +8 ft 21 mph
120 ft +10 ft 23 mph
122 ft +12 ft 25 mph
122 ft +12 ft 25 mph
122 ft +12 ft 25 mph
124 ft +14 ft 27 mph
126 ft +16 ft 29 mph
128 ft +18 ft 30 mph
128 ft +18 ft 30 mph
131 ft +21 ft 32 mph
131 ft +21 ft 32 mph
143 ft +33 ft 38 mph
160 ft +50 ft 45 mph
169 ft +59 ft 47 mph

The difference between best and worst was 53.4% (59 ft ≈ 4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Rockblade ROCK 868S would still be travelling at 47 mph when the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Braking - Concrete

Wet braking on Concrete in feet (50 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking - Concrete
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
121 ft Best 0 mph
128 ft +7 ft 19 mph
129 ft +8 ft 20 mph
129 ft +8 ft 20 mph
131 ft +10 ft 22 mph
132 ft +11 ft 23 mph
132 ft +11 ft 23 mph
132 ft +11 ft 23 mph
137 ft +16 ft 27 mph
138 ft +17 ft 28 mph
138 ft +17 ft 28 mph
145 ft +24 ft 32 mph
146 ft +25 ft 33 mph
159 ft +38 ft 39 mph
175 ft +54 ft 44 mph
184 ft +63 ft 47 mph

The difference between best and worst was 51.8% (63 ft ≈ 4.2 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Rockblade ROCK 868S would still be travelling at 47 mph when the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
61.3 mph Best
60.4 mph -0.9 mph
59.7 mph -1.6 mph
59.1 mph -2.2 mph
58.7 mph -2.6 mph
58.1 mph -3.2 mph
54.7 mph -6.6 mph
54.2 mph -7.1 mph
53.9 mph -7.4 mph
53.5 mph -7.8 mph
53.4 mph -7.9 mph
53.4 mph -7.9 mph
52.0 mph -9.3 mph
48.6 mph -12.7 mph
45.7 mph -15.6 mph
41.9 mph -19.4 mph

The difference between best and worst was 31.6% (19.4 mph).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TireResultGap to best
14.4 ft/s² Best
14.1 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
13.5 ft/s² -0.9 ft/s²
13.1 ft/s² -1.3 ft/s²
12.8 ft/s² -1.6 ft/s²
12.8 ft/s² -1.6 ft/s²
11.5 ft/s² -2.9 ft/s²
11.2 ft/s² -3.2 ft/s²
10.8 ft/s² -3.6 ft/s²
10.5 ft/s² -3.9 ft/s²
10.5 ft/s² -3.9 ft/s²
10.5 ft/s² -3.9 ft/s²
9.8 ft/s² -4.6 ft/s²
9.5 ft/s² -4.9 ft/s²
7.2 ft/s² -7.2 ft/s²
4.3 ft/s² -10.1 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 70.5% (10.1 ft/s²).

Snow

2

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (19 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
33 ft Best 0 mph
33 ft 0 ft 8 mph
33 ft 0 ft 11 mph
33 ft 0 ft 11 mph
33 ft 0 ft 11 mph
33 ft 0 ft 11 mph
34 ft +1 ft 14 mph
34 ft +1 ft 16 mph
34 ft +1 ft 16 mph
34 ft +1 ft 17 mph
35 ft +2 ft 19 mph
35 ft +2 ft 20 mph
35 ft +2 ft 20 mph
35 ft +2 ft 20 mph
36 ft +3 ft 23 mph
36 ft +3 ft 24 mph

The difference between best and worst was 10% (3 ft). From 80 mph, the Atlas Polarbear HP would still be travelling at 24 mph when the Barum Polaris 6 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
666 lbf Best
658 lbf -8 lbf
653 lbf -13 lbf
645 lbf -21 lbf
641 lbf -25 lbf
639 lbf -27 lbf
638 lbf -28 lbf
636 lbf -30 lbf
635 lbf -31 lbf
632 lbf -34 lbf
631 lbf -35 lbf
631 lbf -35 lbf
629 lbf -37 lbf
624 lbf -42 lbf
623 lbf -43 lbf
578 lbf -88 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 13.2% (88 lbf).

Ice

1

Ice Braking

Ice braking in feet (12 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Ice Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
64 ft Best 0 mph
64 ft 0 ft 8 mph
66 ft +2 ft 15 mph
66 ft +2 ft 16 mph
69 ft +5 ft 21 mph
69 ft +5 ft 22 mph
69 ft +5 ft 22 mph
70 ft +6 ft 23 mph
71 ft +7 ft 25 mph
71 ft +7 ft 25 mph
71 ft +7 ft 25 mph
72 ft +8 ft 27 mph
72 ft +8 ft 28 mph
72 ft +8 ft 28 mph
73 ft +9 ft 29 mph
74 ft +10 ft 30 mph

The difference between best and worst was 16.5% (10 ft ≈ 0.7 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 would still be travelling at 30 mph when the Rockblade ROCK 868S had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
69.9 dB Best
70.2 dB +0.30 dB
70.5 dB +0.60 dB
71.2 dB +1.30 dB
71.3 dB +1.40 dB
71.5 dB +1.60 dB
71.5 dB +1.60 dB
71.5 dB +1.60 dB
71.6 dB +1.70 dB
72.1 dB +2.20 dB
72.3 dB +2.40 dB
72.3 dB +2.40 dB
72.4 dB +2.50 dB
72.5 dB +2.60 dB
72.9 dB +3.00 dB
73.1 dB +3.20 dB

The difference between best and worst was 4.6% (3.2 dB).

Value

4

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TireResultGap to best
24,855 miles Best
22,245 miles -2,610 miles
21,934 miles -2,921 miles
21,313 miles -3,542 miles
20,567 miles -4,288 miles
19,884 miles -4,971 miles
19,076 miles -5,779 miles
18,952 miles -5,903 miles
18,517 miles -6,338 miles
18,330 miles -6,525 miles
18,020 miles -6,835 miles
18,020 miles -6,835 miles
17,585 miles -7,270 miles
17,523 miles -7,332 miles
16,963 miles -7,892 miles
13,919 miles -10,936 miles

The difference between best and worst was 44% (10,936 miles).

Value

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear

Lower is better ↓
Value
Position / TireResultGap to best
1.18 Price/1000 Best
1.3 Price/1000 +0.12 Price/1000
1.68 Price/1000 +0.50 Price/1000
1.74 Price/1000 +0.56 Price/1000
1.86 Price/1000 +0.68 Price/1000
2.02 Price/1000 +0.84 Price/1000
2.03 Price/1000 +0.85 Price/1000
2.07 Price/1000 +0.89 Price/1000
2.16 Price/1000 +0.98 Price/1000
2.19 Price/1000 +1.01 Price/1000
2.31 Price/1000 +1.13 Price/1000
2.33 Price/1000 +1.15 Price/1000
2.34 Price/1000 +1.16 Price/1000
2.42 Price/1000 +1.24 Price/1000
2.48 Price/1000 +1.30 Price/1000
3.26 Price/1000 +2.08 Price/1000

The difference between best and worst was 176.3% (2.08 Price/1000).

Fuel Consumption

Fuel consumption in Liters per 100 km

Lower is better ↓
Fuel Consumption
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
5.3 l/100km Best $0
5.3 l/100km Best $0
5.4 l/100km +0.10 l/100km $18
5.4 l/100km +0.10 l/100km $18
5.5 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
5.5 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
5.5 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
5.5 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
5.5 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
5.5 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
5.6 l/100km +0.30 l/100km $55
5.6 l/100km +0.30 l/100km $55
5.6 l/100km +0.30 l/100km $55
5.6 l/100km +0.30 l/100km $55
5.7 l/100km +0.40 l/100km $73
5.8 l/100km +0.50 l/100km $92

The difference between best and worst was 9.4% (0.5 l/100km). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Linglong Sport Master Winter uses about 26 gal ($92) more fuel than the Barum Polaris 6.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Abrasion

Weight of Tire Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t)

Lower is better ↓
Abrasion
Position / TireResultGap to best
63 mg/km/t Best
72 mg/km/t +9.00 mg/km/t
73 mg/km/t +10.00 mg/km/t
77 mg/km/t +14.00 mg/km/t
79 mg/km/t +16.00 mg/km/t
82 mg/km/t +19.00 mg/km/t
82 mg/km/t +19.00 mg/km/t
82 mg/km/t +19.00 mg/km/t
87 mg/km/t +24.00 mg/km/t
93 mg/km/t +30.00 mg/km/t
95 mg/km/t +32.00 mg/km/t
107 mg/km/t +44.00 mg/km/t
108 mg/km/t +45.00 mg/km/t
110 mg/km/t +47.00 mg/km/t
113 mg/km/t +50.00 mg/km/t
117 mg/km/t +54.00 mg/km/t

The difference between best and worst was 85.7% (54 mg/km/t).

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
49.7 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking - Concrete
49.7 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking
18.6 → 0.0 mph
Ice Braking
12.4 → 0.0 mph

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.