Adjust Result Weighting
The overall scores below are calculated using our weighting system. Since the original publication may use a different scoring methodology that wasn't shared, these results may differ from their published rankings. You can adjust the weightings below to explore how different priorities affect the results.
Test Results Data
BEST
Good
Average
Below Average
Cells are colour-coded from green (best) to red (worst). The Total Score reflects the weighted sum of all categories. A ★ marks the best tire in each test.
| # | Tire | Total Score | Dry | Wet | Comfort | Value | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braking M | Subj. Dry Handling Points | % | Braking M | Handling s | Circle s | Straight Aqua Km/H | % | Subj. Comfort Points | Subj. Noise Points | Rough Noise dB | % | Fuel Consumption l/100km | % | |||
| 1 | Continental PremiumContact 7 | 98.2% | 41.8 ★ | 5 ★ | 100% | 35.5 ★ | 72.9 2 | 11.53 | 84.6 | 99.1% | 3 | 5 ★ | 72.8 ★ | 86.7% | 5.5 | 93.6% |
| 2 | Pirelli Cinturato C3 | 96.5% | 42.6 3 | 5 ★ | 98.4% | 36.3 2 | 72.6 ★ | 11.3 ★ | 84.9 | 99.2% | 3 | 2 | 74.7 | 65.8% | 5.6 | 92% |
| 3 ▲1 | Falken ZIEX ZE320 | 96.2% | 42.1 2 | 4 | 96% | 36.6 3 | 74.2 | 11.53 | 84.9 | 97.8% | 4 2 | 4 2 | 73.2 2 | 86.5% | 5.5 | 93.6% |
| 4 ▲2 | Michelin Primacy 5 | 94.9% | 44.8 | 5 ★ | 94.4% | 38.8 | 73.8 | 11.66 | 85 3 | 96.1% | 4 2 | 3 | 74 | 79.5% | 5.2 2 | 99% |
| 5 ▼2 | Nokian Hakka Blue 3 | 94.8% | 43.1 | 3 | 90.7% | 36.9 | 73.2 3 | 11.4 3 | 85.4 2 | 98.4% | 4 2 | 4 2 | 73.7 | 86.3% | 5.35 | 96.3% |
| 6 ▼1 | Bridgestone Turanza 6 | 94.6% | 44 | 4 | 92.5% | 37.2 | 74 | 11.48 | 84.2 | 97.4% | 4 2 | 3 | 73.5 | 79.7% | 5.4 | 95.4% |
| 7 ▲1 | Maxxis Premitra HP6 | 92.9% | 44.9 | 4 | 90.9% | 38.3 | 74.3 | 11.34 2 | 84.3 | 96.9% | 2 | 2 | 73.9 | 59.5% | 5.3 | 97.2% |
| 8 ▼1 | Nexen N Fera Primus | 92.2% | 44.4 | 3 | 88.3% | 37.6 | 74.3 | 11.52 | 85.7 ★ | 97.2% | 2 | 3 | 73.2 2 | 66.5% | 5.5 | 93.6% |
| 9 | Landsail RapidDragon | 91.2% | 44.9 | 2 | 84.1% | 40.1 | 75.5 | 11.54 | 84.1 | 94.7% | 5 ★ | 4 2 | 73.7 | 92.9% | 5.25 3 | 98.1% |
| 10 | Linglong Eco Master | 87.2% | 48 | 2 | 79.1% | 42 | 76 | 11.8 | 83.2 | 92.6% | 3 | 2 | 74.4 | 66% | 5.15 ★ | 100% |
Scroll for more
Dry
100%
Wet
99%
Comfort
87%
Value
94%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
41.8 M
★
Subj. Dry Handling
5 Points
★
Wet
Wet Braking
35.5 M
★
Wet Handling
72.9 s
2
Wet Circle
11.53 s
Straight Aqua
84.6 Km/H
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
3 Points
Subj. Noise
5 Points
★
Rough Noise
72.8 dB
★
Value
Fuel Consumption
5.5 l/100km
Dry
98%
Wet
99%
Comfort
66%
Value
92%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
42.6 M
3
Subj. Dry Handling
5 Points
★
Wet
Wet Braking
36.3 M
2
Wet Handling
72.6 s
★
Wet Circle
11.3 s
★
Straight Aqua
84.9 Km/H
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
3 Points
Subj. Noise
2 Points
Rough Noise
74.7 dB
Value
Fuel Consumption
5.6 l/100km
Dry
96%
Wet
98%
Comfort
87%
Value
94%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
42.1 M
2
Subj. Dry Handling
4 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
36.6 M
3
Wet Handling
74.2 s
Wet Circle
11.53 s
Straight Aqua
84.9 Km/H
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
4 Points
2
Subj. Noise
4 Points
2
Rough Noise
73.2 dB
2
Value
Fuel Consumption
5.5 l/100km
Dry
94%
Wet
96%
Comfort
80%
Value
99%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
44.8 M
Subj. Dry Handling
5 Points
★
Wet
Wet Braking
38.8 M
Wet Handling
73.8 s
Wet Circle
11.66 s
Straight Aqua
85 Km/H
3
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
4 Points
2
Subj. Noise
3 Points
Rough Noise
74 dB
Value
Fuel Consumption
5.2 l/100km
2
Dry
91%
Wet
98%
Comfort
86%
Value
96%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
43.1 M
Subj. Dry Handling
3 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
36.9 M
Wet Handling
73.2 s
3
Wet Circle
11.4 s
3
Straight Aqua
85.4 Km/H
2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
4 Points
2
Subj. Noise
4 Points
2
Rough Noise
73.7 dB
Value
Fuel Consumption
5.35 l/100km
Dry
93%
Wet
97%
Comfort
80%
Value
95%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
44 M
Subj. Dry Handling
4 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
37.2 M
Wet Handling
74 s
Wet Circle
11.48 s
Straight Aqua
84.2 Km/H
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
4 Points
2
Subj. Noise
3 Points
Rough Noise
73.5 dB
Value
Fuel Consumption
5.4 l/100km
Dry
91%
Wet
97%
Comfort
60%
Value
97%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
44.9 M
Subj. Dry Handling
4 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
38.3 M
Wet Handling
74.3 s
Wet Circle
11.34 s
2
Straight Aqua
84.3 Km/H
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
2 Points
Subj. Noise
2 Points
Rough Noise
73.9 dB
Value
Fuel Consumption
5.3 l/100km
Dry
88%
Wet
97%
Comfort
67%
Value
94%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
44.4 M
Subj. Dry Handling
3 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
37.6 M
Wet Handling
74.3 s
Wet Circle
11.52 s
Straight Aqua
85.7 Km/H
★
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
2 Points
Subj. Noise
3 Points
Rough Noise
73.2 dB
2
Value
Fuel Consumption
5.5 l/100km
Dry
84%
Wet
95%
Comfort
93%
Value
98%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
44.9 M
Subj. Dry Handling
2 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
40.1 M
Wet Handling
75.5 s
Wet Circle
11.54 s
Straight Aqua
84.1 Km/H
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
5 Points
★
Subj. Noise
4 Points
2
Rough Noise
73.7 dB
Value
Fuel Consumption
5.25 l/100km
3
Dry
79%
Wet
93%
Comfort
66%
Value
100%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking
48 M
Subj. Dry Handling
2 Points
Wet
Wet Braking
42 M
Wet Handling
76 s
Wet Circle
11.8 s
Straight Aqua
83.2 Km/H
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
3 Points
Subj. Noise
2 Points
Rough Noise
74.4 dB
Value
Fuel Consumption
5.15 l/100km
★
Not every driver has the same priorities. Adjust the category weightings above to re-rank the tires based on what matters most to your driving style.
Scores are colour-coded from red (weakest) through yellow to green (strongest) to help you quickly spot each tire's strengths and weaknesses.
The original test ranking is shown in the # column. Arrows indicate how each tire moves when your custom weighting is applied.
