2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tire Test

Below are all the data points for the 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tire Test, displaying how each tire performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tire's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Michelin Primacy 5
Continental PremiumContact 7
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
Bridgestone Turanza 6
Nokian Hakka Blue 3
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
Vredestein Ultrac
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Nordman South
Falken ZIEX ZE320
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 with a result of 34.2 M. The difference between best and worst was 16.2%.

Subj. Dry Handling ( Points)

Subjective Dry Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental PremiumContact 7 with a result of 10 Points. The difference between best and worst was 30%.

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Primacy 5 with a result of 33 M. The difference between best and worst was 9.6%.

Wet Handling (s)

Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 with a result of 75.5 s. The difference between best and worst was 4.4%.

Subj. Wet Handling ( Points)

Subjective Wet Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental PremiumContact 7 with a result of 10 Points. The difference between best and worst was 30%.

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Primacy 5 with a result of 79.4 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 7.8%.

Comfort Performance Overview

Subj. Noise ( Points)

Subjective in car noise levels (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Bridgestone Turanza 6 with a result of 10 Points. The difference between best and worst was 20%.

Value Performance Overview

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Bridgestone Turanza 6 with a result of 7.6 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 5.5%.

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tire Score
1 Michelin Primacy 5 0%
2 Continental PremiumContact 7 0%
3 Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 0%
4 Bridgestone Turanza 6 0%
5 Nokian Hakka Blue 3 0%
6 Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%
7 Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 0%
8 Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 0%
9 Vredestein Ultrac 0%
10 Continental AllSeasonContact 2 0%
11 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 0%
12 Nordman South 0%
13 Falken ZIEX ZE320 0%
14 Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 0%
comments powered by Disqus