2025 Autobild EV All Season Mini-Test

Below are all the data points for the 2025 Autobild EV All Season Mini-Test, displaying how each tire performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tire's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Hankook iON FlexClimate
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Hankook iON FlexClimate with a result of 39 M. The difference between best and worst was 7.8%.

Dry Handling (Km/H)

Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: All the tires in the dry handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Hankook iON FlexClimate with a result of 39.1 M. The difference between best and worst was 7.6%.

Wet Handling (Km/H)

Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Hankook iON FlexClimate with a result of 74.6 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 4.7%.

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Hankook iON FlexClimate with a result of 86 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 8.3%.

Curved Aquaplaning (m/sec2)

Remaining lateral acceleration (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Hankook iON FlexClimate with a result of 3.04 m/sec2. The difference between best and worst was 13.2%.

Snow Performance Overview

Snow Braking (M)

Snow braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin CrossClimate 2 with a result of 32 M. The difference between best and worst was 9.3%.

Snow Traction (s)

Snow acceleration time (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin CrossClimate 2 with a result of 6.2 s. The difference between best and worst was 10.1%.

Snow Handling (Km/H)

Snow handling average speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin CrossClimate 2 with a result of 54.5 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 4%.

Value Performance Overview

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin CrossClimate 2 with a result of 7.03 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 5.6%.

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tire Score
1 Hankook iON FlexClimate 0%
2 Michelin CrossClimate 2 0%
3 Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV 0%
comments powered by Disqus