Test Charts / ADAC
2024 ADAC 16 Inch Winter Tire Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 205/55 R16
- Tires tested
- 12
- Disciplines
- 12
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tires
Select tires to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
1Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 142 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 145 ft | +3 ft | 11 mph | |
| 145 ft | +3 ft | 11 mph | |
| 146 ft | +4 ft | 13 mph | |
| 147 ft | +5 ft | 14 mph | |
| 148 ft | +6 ft | 16 mph | |
| 149 ft | +7 ft | 18 mph | |
| 150 ft | +8 ft | 18 mph | |
| 150 ft | +8 ft | 18 mph | |
| 150 ft | +8 ft | 19 mph | |
| 151 ft | +9 ft | 19 mph | |
| 153 ft | +11 ft | 21 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 7.4% (11 ft ≈ 0.7 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Winrun Winter max A1 WR22 would still be travelling at 21 mph when the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet
4Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet (50 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 115 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 115 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 116 ft | +1 ft | 7 mph | |
| 116 ft | +1 ft | 8 mph | |
| 118 ft | +3 ft | 12 mph | |
| 118 ft | +3 ft | 13 mph | |
| 119 ft | +4 ft | 15 mph | |
| 121 ft | +6 ft | 18 mph | |
| 122 ft | +7 ft | 19 mph | |
| 122 ft | +7 ft | 19 mph | |
| 130 ft | +15 ft | 27 mph | |
| 134 ft | +19 ft | 30 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 16% (19 ft ≈ 1.2 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Winrun Winter max A1 WR22 would still be travelling at 30 mph when the Continental WinterContact TS 870 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Braking - Concrete
Wet braking on Concrete in feet (50 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 126 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 128 ft | +2 ft | 9 mph | |
| 128 ft | +2 ft | 10 mph | |
| 129 ft | +3 ft | 11 mph | |
| 132 ft | +6 ft | 16 mph | |
| 132 ft | +6 ft | 17 mph | |
| 135 ft | +9 ft | 20 mph | |
| 137 ft | +11 ft | 22 mph | |
| 138 ft | +12 ft | 23 mph | |
| 139 ft | +13 ft | 24 mph | |
| 145 ft | +19 ft | 29 mph | |
| 153 ft | +27 ft | 33 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 21% (27 ft ≈ 1.8 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Winrun Winter max A1 WR22 would still be travelling at 33 mph when the Continental WinterContact TS 870 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in mph
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 52.4 mph | Best | |
| 52.2 mph | -0.2 mph | |
| 51.6 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 50.3 mph | -2.1 mph | |
| 50.1 mph | -2.3 mph | |
| 50.1 mph | -2.3 mph | |
| 50.0 mph | -2.4 mph | |
| 48.0 mph | -4.4 mph | |
| 47.5 mph | -4.9 mph | |
| 47.3 mph | -5.1 mph | |
| 42.9 mph | -9.5 mph | |
| 42.8 mph | -9.6 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 18.4% (9.6 mph).
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 12.1 ft/s² | Best | |
| 11.8 ft/s² | -0.3 ft/s² | |
| 11.8 ft/s² | -0.3 ft/s² | |
| 11.8 ft/s² | -0.3 ft/s² | |
| 11.8 ft/s² | -0.3 ft/s² | |
| 10.8 ft/s² | -1.3 ft/s² | |
| 10.8 ft/s² | -1.3 ft/s² | |
| 10.5 ft/s² | -1.6 ft/s² | |
| 9.8 ft/s² | -2.3 ft/s² | |
| 9.5 ft/s² | -2.6 ft/s² | |
| 7.9 ft/s² | -4.2 ft/s² | |
| 7.9 ft/s² | -4.2 ft/s² |
The difference between best and worst was 35.1% (4.2 ft/s²).
Snow
2Snow Braking
Snow braking in feet (19 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 32 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 33 ft | +1 ft | 8 mph | |
| 33 ft | +1 ft | 11 mph | |
| 33 ft | +1 ft | 11 mph | |
| 33 ft | +1 ft | 14 mph | |
| 33 ft | +1 ft | 14 mph | |
| 34 ft | +2 ft | 16 mph | |
| 34 ft | +2 ft | 16 mph | |
| 34 ft | +2 ft | 19 mph | |
| 36 ft | +4 ft | 25 mph | |
| 36 ft | +4 ft | 25 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 11.1% (4 ft). From 80 mph, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 would still be travelling at 25 mph when the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Snow Traction
Pulling Force in pounds-force
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 53 lbf | Best | |
| 53 lbf | 0 lbf | |
| 53 lbf | 0 lbf | |
| 52 lbf | -1 lbf | |
| 52 lbf | -1 lbf | |
| 52 lbf | -1 lbf | |
| 52 lbf | -1 lbf | |
| 52 lbf | -1 lbf | |
| 51 lbf | -2 lbf | |
| 50 lbf | -3 lbf | |
| 49 lbf | -4 lbf | |
| 47 lbf | -6 lbf |
The difference between best and worst was 11.9% (6 lbf).
Ice
1Ice Braking
Ice braking in feet (12 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 63 ft | +3 ft | 16 mph | |
| 64 ft | +4 ft | 19 mph | |
| 64 ft | +4 ft | 19 mph | |
| 64 ft | +4 ft | 19 mph | |
| 65 ft | +5 ft | 22 mph | |
| 66 ft | +6 ft | 23 mph | |
| 66 ft | +6 ft | 23 mph | |
| 67 ft | +7 ft | 25 mph | |
| 68 ft | +8 ft | 28 mph | |
| 70 ft | +10 ft | 30 mph | |
| 71 ft | +11 ft | 31 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 18% (11 ft ≈ 0.7 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Nokian Snowproof 2 would still be travelling at 31 mph when the Continental WinterContact TS 870 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Comfort
1Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 70.4 dB | Best | |
| 70.9 dB | +0.50 dB | |
| 71 dB | +0.60 dB | |
| 71.1 dB | +0.70 dB | |
| 71.2 dB | +0.80 dB | |
| 71.3 dB | +0.90 dB | |
| 71.6 dB | +1.20 dB | |
| 71.7 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 71.9 dB | +1.50 dB | |
| 72 dB | +1.60 dB | |
| 72.5 dB | +2.10 dB | |
| 73 dB | +2.60 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 3.7% (2.6 dB).
Value
3Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 33,057 miles | Best | |
| 32,808 miles | -249 miles | |
| 30,509 miles | -2,548 miles | |
| 30,261 miles | -2,796 miles | |
| 29,204 miles | -3,853 miles | |
| 27,402 miles | -5,655 miles | |
| 27,216 miles | -5,841 miles | |
| 26,284 miles | -6,773 miles | |
| 23,923 miles | -9,134 miles | |
| 23,053 miles | -10,004 miles | |
| 21,127 miles | -11,930 miles | |
| 20,754 miles | -12,303 miles |
The difference between best and worst was 37.2% (12,303 miles).
Fuel Consumption
Fuel consumption in Liters per 100 km
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5.1 l/100km | Best | $0 | |
| 5.1 l/100km | Best | $0 | |
| 5.1 l/100km | Best | $0 | |
| 5.1 l/100km | Best | $0 | |
| 5.1 l/100km | Best | $0 | |
| 5.1 l/100km | Best | $0 | |
| 5.2 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | $18 | |
| 5.2 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | $18 | |
| 5.2 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | $18 | |
| 5.2 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | $18 | |
| 5.2 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | $18 | |
| 5.2 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | $18 |
All the tires in the Fuel Consumption test finished less than 3% apart. Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Michelin Alpin 6 uses about 5 gal ($18) more fuel than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.
Abrasion
Weight of Tire Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 48 mg/km/t | Best | |
| 48 mg/km/t | Best | |
| 57 mg/km/t | +9.00 mg/km/t | |
| 57 mg/km/t | +9.00 mg/km/t | |
| 59 mg/km/t | +11.00 mg/km/t | |
| 61 mg/km/t | +13.00 mg/km/t | |
| 62 mg/km/t | +14.00 mg/km/t | |
| 71 mg/km/t | +23.00 mg/km/t | |
| 72 mg/km/t | +24.00 mg/km/t | |
| 72 mg/km/t | +24.00 mg/km/t | |
| 72 mg/km/t | +24.00 mg/km/t | |
| 79 mg/km/t | +31.00 mg/km/t |
The difference between best and worst was 64.6% (31 mg/km/t).
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Wet Braking
- 49.7 → 0.0 mph
- Wet Braking - Concrete
- 49.7 → 0.0 mph
- Snow Braking
- 18.6 → 0.0 mph
- Ice Braking
- 12.4 → 0.0 mph
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2024 Winter 55 Tire Braking Test
205/55 R1655 tires tested
11 of these 12 tires tested again
2024 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test
205/55 R1620 tires tested
8 of these 12 tires tested again
2026 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 185/65 R15
185/65 R1516 tires tested
6 of these 12 tires tested again

