Test Charts / TESTIRENKAAT
2023 Studless vs Studded Snow Tire Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 205/55 R16
- Tires tested
- 8
- Disciplines
- 9
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tires
Select tires to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
1Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet (50 - 3 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 101 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 102 ft | +1 ft | 8 mph | |
| 102 ft | +1 ft | 10 mph | |
| 103 ft | +2 ft | 11 mph | |
| 103 ft | +2 ft | 12 mph | |
| 104 ft | +3 ft | 15 mph | |
| 107 ft | +6 ft | 19 mph | |
| 108 ft | +7 ft | 22 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 7.8% (7 ft ≈ 0.5 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Antares GRIP 60 ice would still be travelling at 22 mph when the Pirelli Ice Zero FR had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet
2Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet (50 - 3 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 107 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 110 ft | +3 ft | 14 mph | |
| 119 ft | +12 ft | 25 mph | |
| 126 ft | +19 ft | 31 mph | |
| 134 ft | +27 ft | 36 mph | |
| 135 ft | +28 ft | 36 mph | |
| 138 ft | +31 ft | 38 mph | |
| 142 ft | +35 ft | 40 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 32.7% (35 ft ≈ 2.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 would still be travelling at 40 mph when the Sunfull SF W11 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Handling
Wet handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 40.4 s | Best | |
| 40.8 s | +0.40 s | |
| 40.8 s | +0.40 s | |
| 41.4 s | +1.00 s | |
| 42.2 s | +1.80 s | |
| 42.7 s | +2.30 s | |
| 42.8 s | +2.40 s | |
| 44.9 s | +4.50 s |
The difference between best and worst was 11.1% (4.5 s).
Snow
3Snow Braking
Snow braking in feet
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 37 ft | Best | |
| 38 ft | +1 ft | |
| 38 ft | +1 ft | |
| 38 ft | +1 ft | |
| 39 ft | +2 ft | |
| 40 ft | +3 ft | |
| 40 ft | +3 ft | |
| 43 ft | +6 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 14.9% (6 ft ≈ 0.4 Car Lengths).
Snow Traction
Snow acceleration time (3 - 22 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 4.34 s | Best | |
| 4.39 s | +0.05 s | |
| 4.45 s | +0.11 s | |
| 4.47 s | +0.13 s | |
| 4.91 s | +0.57 s | |
| 5.16 s | +0.82 s | |
| 5.41 s | +1.07 s | |
| 5.44 s | +1.10 s |
The difference between best and worst was 25.3% (1.1 s).
Snow Handling
Snow handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 83.04 s | Best | |
| 83.28 s | +0.24 s | |
| 84.04 s | +1.00 s | |
| 85.19 s | +2.15 s | |
| 90.82 s | +7.78 s | |
| 91.69 s | +8.65 s | |
| 93.33 s | +10.29 s | |
| 93.73 s | +10.69 s |
The difference between best and worst was 12.9% (10.69 s).
Ice
3Ice Braking
Ice braking in feet (16 - 3 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 48 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 49 ft | +1 ft | 11 mph | |
| 50 ft | +2 ft | 14 mph | |
| 50 ft | +2 ft | 15 mph | |
| 52 ft | +4 ft | 22 mph | |
| 52 ft | +4 ft | 22 mph | |
| 54 ft | +6 ft | 26 mph | |
| 56 ft | +8 ft | 29 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 14.9% (8 ft ≈ 0.5 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Winrun Winter Max S1 WR60 would still be travelling at 29 mph when the Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Ice Traction
Ice acceleration time (3 - 16 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 5.95 s | Best | |
| 6.39 s | +0.44 s | |
| 6.67 s | +0.72 s | |
| 6.68 s | +0.73 s | |
| 6.93 s | +0.98 s | |
| 6.93 s | +0.98 s | |
| 7.01 s | +1.06 s | |
| 7.71 s | +1.76 s |
The difference between best and worst was 29.6% (1.76 s).
Ice Handling
Ice handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 69.76 s | Best | |
| 69.9 s | +0.14 s | |
| 71.21 s | +1.45 s | |
| 77.09 s | +7.33 s | |
| 81.25 s | +11.49 s | |
| 82.21 s | +12.45 s | |
| 83.04 s | +13.28 s | |
| 89.39 s | +19.63 s |
The difference between best and worst was 28.1% (19.63 s).
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 49.7 → 3.1 mph
- Wet Braking
- 49.7 → 3.1 mph
- Snow Traction
- 3.1 → 21.7 mph
- Ice Braking
- 15.5 → 3.1 mph
- Ice Traction
- 3.1 → 15.5 mph
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tire Test
235/45 R1820 tires tested
3 of these 8 tires tested again
The Best Snow Tires for 2025/26
205/55 R165 tires tested
3 of these 8 tires tested again
2025 Friction and Studded Winter Tire Test
205/55 R1614 tires tested
3 of these 8 tires tested again

