Menu

Test Charts / ADAC

2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
225/45 R17
Tires tested
15
Disciplines
12

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

1

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
140 ft Best 0 mph
143 ft +3 ft 12 mph
143 ft +3 ft 13 mph
144 ft +4 ft 13 mph
145 ft +5 ft 15 mph
146 ft +6 ft 17 mph
146 ft +6 ft 17 mph
146 ft +6 ft 17 mph
147 ft +7 ft 17 mph
147 ft +7 ft 18 mph
147 ft +7 ft 18 mph
148 ft +8 ft 18 mph
149 ft +9 ft 20 mph
149 ft +9 ft 20 mph
152 ft +12 ft 23 mph

The difference between best and worst was 8.9% (12 ft ≈ 0.8 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Sava Eskimo HP2 would still be travelling at 23 mph when the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet

3

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (50 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
112 ft Best 0 mph
118 ft +6 ft 17 mph
120 ft +8 ft 20 mph
121 ft +9 ft 21 mph
124 ft +12 ft 24 mph
125 ft +13 ft 25 mph
126 ft +14 ft 26 mph
126 ft +14 ft 27 mph
126 ft +14 ft 27 mph
127 ft +15 ft 27 mph
128 ft +16 ft 28 mph
129 ft +17 ft 29 mph
133 ft +21 ft 32 mph
135 ft +23 ft 33 mph
140 ft +28 ft 36 mph

The difference between best and worst was 24.9% (28 ft ≈ 1.9 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Sava Eskimo HP2 would still be travelling at 36 mph when the Hankook Winter I cept RS3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
50.4 mph Best
48.9 mph -1.5 mph
48.6 mph -1.8 mph
48.3 mph -2.1 mph
47.7 mph -2.7 mph
47.7 mph -2.7 mph
47.6 mph -2.8 mph
46.0 mph -4.4 mph
45.9 mph -4.5 mph
45.9 mph -4.5 mph
45.7 mph -4.7 mph
45.0 mph -5.4 mph
45.0 mph -5.4 mph
44.6 mph -5.8 mph
44.2 mph -6.2 mph

The difference between best and worst was 12.3% (6.2 mph).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TireResultGap to best
10.8 ft/s² Best
10.5 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
10.2 ft/s² -0.6 ft/s²
10.2 ft/s² -0.6 ft/s²
10.2 ft/s² -0.6 ft/s²
10.2 ft/s² -0.6 ft/s²
10.2 ft/s² -0.6 ft/s²
9.8 ft/s² -1.0 ft/s²
9.8 ft/s² -1.0 ft/s²
9.5 ft/s² -1.3 ft/s²
9.2 ft/s² -1.6 ft/s²
8.9 ft/s² -1.9 ft/s²
8.9 ft/s² -1.9 ft/s²
8.9 ft/s² -1.9 ft/s²
8.9 ft/s² -1.9 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 18.2% (1.9 ft/s²).

Snow

2

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (19 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
31 ft Best 0 mph
31 ft 0 ft 8 mph
31 ft 0 ft 8 mph
31 ft 0 ft 8 mph
31 ft 0 ft 12 mph
32 ft +1 ft 14 mph
32 ft +1 ft 18 mph
33 ft +2 ft 20 mph
33 ft +2 ft 21 mph
33 ft +2 ft 21 mph
33 ft +2 ft 21 mph
33 ft +2 ft 22 mph
34 ft +3 ft 24 mph
34 ft +3 ft 24 mph
34 ft +3 ft 26 mph

The difference between best and worst was 11.7% (3 ft). From 80 mph, the Apollo Aspire XP Winter would still be travelling at 26 mph when the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
58 lbf Best
58 lbf 0 lbf
57 lbf -1 lbf
56 lbf -2 lbf
56 lbf -2 lbf
56 lbf -2 lbf
56 lbf -2 lbf
55 lbf -3 lbf
55 lbf -3 lbf
53 lbf -5 lbf
53 lbf -5 lbf
53 lbf -5 lbf
52 lbf -6 lbf
52 lbf -6 lbf
52 lbf -6 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 11.1% (6 lbf).

Ice

1

Ice Braking

Ice braking in feet (12 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Ice Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
64 ft Best 0 mph
64 ft Best 0 mph
65 ft +1 ft 8 mph
65 ft +1 ft 8 mph
65 ft +1 ft 10 mph
65 ft +1 ft 11 mph
66 ft +2 ft 14 mph
66 ft +2 ft 15 mph
67 ft +3 ft 17 mph
68 ft +4 ft 18 mph
68 ft +4 ft 20 mph
68 ft +4 ft 20 mph
69 ft +5 ft 21 mph
70 ft +6 ft 23 mph
73 ft +9 ft 27 mph

The difference between best and worst was 13.3% (9 ft ≈ 0.6 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 would still be travelling at 27 mph when the Vredestein Wintrac Pro had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
70.9 dB Best
71.6 dB +0.70 dB
71.7 dB +0.80 dB
72 dB +1.10 dB
72.1 dB +1.20 dB
72.3 dB +1.40 dB
72.4 dB +1.50 dB
72.7 dB +1.80 dB
72.9 dB +2.00 dB
73.1 dB +2.20 dB
73.3 dB +2.40 dB
73.7 dB +2.80 dB
74.1 dB +3.20 dB
74.3 dB +3.40 dB
75.6 dB +4.70 dB

The difference between best and worst was 6.6% (4.7 dB).

Value

4

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TireResultGap to best
39,768 miles Best
38,214 miles -1,554 miles
37,904 miles -1,864 miles
34,735 miles -5,033 miles
34,424 miles -5,344 miles
33,803 miles -5,965 miles
32,808 miles -6,960 miles
31,566 miles -8,202 miles
30,323 miles -9,445 miles
30,323 miles -9,445 miles
28,397 miles -11,371 miles
27,775 miles -11,993 miles
25,228 miles -14,540 miles
23,985 miles -15,783 miles
22,432 miles -17,336 miles

The difference between best and worst was 43.6% (17,336 miles).

Value

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear

Lower is better ↓
Value
Position / TireResultGap to best
1.72 Price/1000 Best
2.28 Price/1000 +0.56 Price/1000
2.38 Price/1000 +0.66 Price/1000
2.39 Price/1000 +0.67 Price/1000
2.4 Price/1000 +0.68 Price/1000
2.79 Price/1000 +1.07 Price/1000
2.81 Price/1000 +1.09 Price/1000
2.83 Price/1000 +1.11 Price/1000
2.84 Price/1000 +1.12 Price/1000
2.99 Price/1000 +1.27 Price/1000
2.99 Price/1000 +1.27 Price/1000
3.05 Price/1000 +1.33 Price/1000
3.22 Price/1000 +1.50 Price/1000
3.24 Price/1000 +1.52 Price/1000
4.35 Price/1000 +2.63 Price/1000

The difference between best and worst was 152.9% (2.63 Price/1000).

Fuel Consumption

Fuel consumption in Liters per 100 km

Lower is better ↓
Fuel Consumption
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
5.5 l/100km Best $0
5.5 l/100km Best $0
5.6 l/100km +0.10 l/100km $18
5.6 l/100km +0.10 l/100km $18
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
5.8 l/100km +0.30 l/100km $55
5.8 l/100km +0.30 l/100km $55
5.8 l/100km +0.30 l/100km $55
5.8 l/100km +0.30 l/100km $55

The difference between best and worst was 5.5% (0.3 l/100km). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro uses about 15 gal ($55) more fuel than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Abrasion

Weight of Tire Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t)

Lower is better ↓
Abrasion
Position / TireResultGap to best
56 mg/km/t Best
58.8 mg/km/t +2.80 mg/km/t
64.7 mg/km/t +8.70 mg/km/t
65.3 mg/km/t +9.30 mg/km/t
65.3 mg/km/t +9.30 mg/km/t
66.7 mg/km/t +10.70 mg/km/t
68.1 mg/km/t +12.10 mg/km/t
69.7 mg/km/t +13.70 mg/km/t
71 mg/km/t +15.00 mg/km/t
73.9 mg/km/t +17.90 mg/km/t
74.1 mg/km/t +18.10 mg/km/t
75.4 mg/km/t +19.40 mg/km/t
83.9 mg/km/t +27.90 mg/km/t
88.1 mg/km/t +32.10 mg/km/t
98.5 mg/km/t +42.50 mg/km/t

The difference between best and worst was 75.9% (42.5 mg/km/t).

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
49.7 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking
18.6 → 0.0 mph
Ice Braking
12.4 → 0.0 mph

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.