Test Charts / ADAC
2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tire Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 225/45 R17
- Tires tested
- 15
- Disciplines
- 12
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tires
Select tires to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
1Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 140 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 143 ft | +3 ft | 12 mph | |
| 143 ft | +3 ft | 13 mph | |
| 144 ft | +4 ft | 13 mph | |
| 145 ft | +5 ft | 15 mph | |
| 146 ft | +6 ft | 17 mph | |
| 146 ft | +6 ft | 17 mph | |
| 146 ft | +6 ft | 17 mph | |
| 147 ft | +7 ft | 17 mph | |
| 147 ft | +7 ft | 18 mph | |
| 147 ft | +7 ft | 18 mph | |
| 148 ft | +8 ft | 18 mph | |
| 149 ft | +9 ft | 20 mph | |
| 149 ft | +9 ft | 20 mph | |
| 152 ft | +12 ft | 23 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 8.9% (12 ft ≈ 0.8 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Sava Eskimo HP2 would still be travelling at 23 mph when the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet
3Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet (50 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 112 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 118 ft | +6 ft | 17 mph | |
| 120 ft | +8 ft | 20 mph | |
| 121 ft | +9 ft | 21 mph | |
| 124 ft | +12 ft | 24 mph | |
| 125 ft | +13 ft | 25 mph | |
| 126 ft | +14 ft | 26 mph | |
| 126 ft | +14 ft | 27 mph | |
| 126 ft | +14 ft | 27 mph | |
| 127 ft | +15 ft | 27 mph | |
| 128 ft | +16 ft | 28 mph | |
| 129 ft | +17 ft | 29 mph | |
| 133 ft | +21 ft | 32 mph | |
| 135 ft | +23 ft | 33 mph | |
| 140 ft | +28 ft | 36 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 24.9% (28 ft ≈ 1.9 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Sava Eskimo HP2 would still be travelling at 36 mph when the Hankook Winter I cept RS3 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in mph
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 50.4 mph | Best | |
| 48.9 mph | -1.5 mph | |
| 48.6 mph | -1.8 mph | |
| 48.3 mph | -2.1 mph | |
| 47.7 mph | -2.7 mph | |
| 47.7 mph | -2.7 mph | |
| 47.6 mph | -2.8 mph | |
| 46.0 mph | -4.4 mph | |
| 45.9 mph | -4.5 mph | |
| 45.9 mph | -4.5 mph | |
| 45.7 mph | -4.7 mph | |
| 45.0 mph | -5.4 mph | |
| 45.0 mph | -5.4 mph | |
| 44.6 mph | -5.8 mph | |
| 44.2 mph | -6.2 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 12.3% (6.2 mph).
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 10.8 ft/s² | Best | |
| 10.5 ft/s² | -0.3 ft/s² | |
| 10.2 ft/s² | -0.6 ft/s² | |
| 10.2 ft/s² | -0.6 ft/s² | |
| 10.2 ft/s² | -0.6 ft/s² | |
| 10.2 ft/s² | -0.6 ft/s² | |
| 10.2 ft/s² | -0.6 ft/s² | |
| 9.8 ft/s² | -1.0 ft/s² | |
| 9.8 ft/s² | -1.0 ft/s² | |
| 9.5 ft/s² | -1.3 ft/s² | |
| 9.2 ft/s² | -1.6 ft/s² | |
| 8.9 ft/s² | -1.9 ft/s² | |
| 8.9 ft/s² | -1.9 ft/s² | |
| 8.9 ft/s² | -1.9 ft/s² | |
| 8.9 ft/s² | -1.9 ft/s² |
The difference between best and worst was 18.2% (1.9 ft/s²).
Snow
2Snow Braking
Snow braking in feet (19 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 31 ft | 0 ft | 8 mph | |
| 31 ft | 0 ft | 8 mph | |
| 31 ft | 0 ft | 8 mph | |
| 31 ft | 0 ft | 12 mph | |
| 32 ft | +1 ft | 14 mph | |
| 32 ft | +1 ft | 18 mph | |
| 33 ft | +2 ft | 20 mph | |
| 33 ft | +2 ft | 21 mph | |
| 33 ft | +2 ft | 21 mph | |
| 33 ft | +2 ft | 21 mph | |
| 33 ft | +2 ft | 22 mph | |
| 34 ft | +3 ft | 24 mph | |
| 34 ft | +3 ft | 24 mph | |
| 34 ft | +3 ft | 26 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 11.7% (3 ft). From 80 mph, the Apollo Aspire XP Winter would still be travelling at 26 mph when the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Snow Traction
Pulling Force in pounds-force
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 58 lbf | Best | |
| 58 lbf | 0 lbf | |
| 57 lbf | -1 lbf | |
| 56 lbf | -2 lbf | |
| 56 lbf | -2 lbf | |
| 56 lbf | -2 lbf | |
| 56 lbf | -2 lbf | |
| 55 lbf | -3 lbf | |
| 55 lbf | -3 lbf | |
| 53 lbf | -5 lbf | |
| 53 lbf | -5 lbf | |
| 53 lbf | -5 lbf | |
| 52 lbf | -6 lbf | |
| 52 lbf | -6 lbf | |
| 52 lbf | -6 lbf |
The difference between best and worst was 11.1% (6 lbf).
Ice
1Ice Braking
Ice braking in feet (12 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 64 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 64 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 65 ft | +1 ft | 8 mph | |
| 65 ft | +1 ft | 8 mph | |
| 65 ft | +1 ft | 10 mph | |
| 65 ft | +1 ft | 11 mph | |
| 66 ft | +2 ft | 14 mph | |
| 66 ft | +2 ft | 15 mph | |
| 67 ft | +3 ft | 17 mph | |
| 68 ft | +4 ft | 18 mph | |
| 68 ft | +4 ft | 20 mph | |
| 68 ft | +4 ft | 20 mph | |
| 69 ft | +5 ft | 21 mph | |
| 70 ft | +6 ft | 23 mph | |
| 73 ft | +9 ft | 27 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 13.3% (9 ft ≈ 0.6 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 would still be travelling at 27 mph when the Vredestein Wintrac Pro had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Comfort
1Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 70.9 dB | Best | |
| 71.6 dB | +0.70 dB | |
| 71.7 dB | +0.80 dB | |
| 72 dB | +1.10 dB | |
| 72.1 dB | +1.20 dB | |
| 72.3 dB | +1.40 dB | |
| 72.4 dB | +1.50 dB | |
| 72.7 dB | +1.80 dB | |
| 72.9 dB | +2.00 dB | |
| 73.1 dB | +2.20 dB | |
| 73.3 dB | +2.40 dB | |
| 73.7 dB | +2.80 dB | |
| 74.1 dB | +3.20 dB | |
| 74.3 dB | +3.40 dB | |
| 75.6 dB | +4.70 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 6.6% (4.7 dB).
Value
4Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 39,768 miles | Best | |
| 38,214 miles | -1,554 miles | |
| 37,904 miles | -1,864 miles | |
| 34,735 miles | -5,033 miles | |
| 34,424 miles | -5,344 miles | |
| 33,803 miles | -5,965 miles | |
| 32,808 miles | -6,960 miles | |
| 31,566 miles | -8,202 miles | |
| 30,323 miles | -9,445 miles | |
| 30,323 miles | -9,445 miles | |
| 28,397 miles | -11,371 miles | |
| 27,775 miles | -11,993 miles | |
| 25,228 miles | -14,540 miles | |
| 23,985 miles | -15,783 miles | |
| 22,432 miles | -17,336 miles |
The difference between best and worst was 43.6% (17,336 miles).
Value
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 1.72 Price/1000 | Best | |
| 2.28 Price/1000 | +0.56 Price/1000 | |
| 2.38 Price/1000 | +0.66 Price/1000 | |
| 2.39 Price/1000 | +0.67 Price/1000 | |
| 2.4 Price/1000 | +0.68 Price/1000 | |
| 2.79 Price/1000 | +1.07 Price/1000 | |
| 2.81 Price/1000 | +1.09 Price/1000 | |
| 2.83 Price/1000 | +1.11 Price/1000 | |
| 2.84 Price/1000 | +1.12 Price/1000 | |
| 2.99 Price/1000 | +1.27 Price/1000 | |
| 2.99 Price/1000 | +1.27 Price/1000 | |
| 3.05 Price/1000 | +1.33 Price/1000 | |
| 3.22 Price/1000 | +1.50 Price/1000 | |
| 3.24 Price/1000 | +1.52 Price/1000 | |
| 4.35 Price/1000 | +2.63 Price/1000 |
The difference between best and worst was 152.9% (2.63 Price/1000).
Fuel Consumption
Fuel consumption in Liters per 100 km
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5.5 l/100km | Best | $0 | |
| 5.5 l/100km | Best | $0 | |
| 5.6 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | $18 | |
| 5.6 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | $18 | |
| 5.7 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | $37 | |
| 5.7 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | $37 | |
| 5.7 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | $37 | |
| 5.7 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | $37 | |
| 5.7 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | $37 | |
| 5.7 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | $37 | |
| 5.7 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | $37 | |
| 5.8 l/100km | +0.30 l/100km | $55 | |
| 5.8 l/100km | +0.30 l/100km | $55 | |
| 5.8 l/100km | +0.30 l/100km | $55 | |
| 5.8 l/100km | +0.30 l/100km | $55 |
The difference between best and worst was 5.5% (0.3 l/100km). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro uses about 15 gal ($55) more fuel than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.
Abrasion
Weight of Tire Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 56 mg/km/t | Best | |
| 58.8 mg/km/t | +2.80 mg/km/t | |
| 64.7 mg/km/t | +8.70 mg/km/t | |
| 65.3 mg/km/t | +9.30 mg/km/t | |
| 65.3 mg/km/t | +9.30 mg/km/t | |
| 66.7 mg/km/t | +10.70 mg/km/t | |
| 68.1 mg/km/t | +12.10 mg/km/t | |
| 69.7 mg/km/t | +13.70 mg/km/t | |
| 71 mg/km/t | +15.00 mg/km/t | |
| 73.9 mg/km/t | +17.90 mg/km/t | |
| 74.1 mg/km/t | +18.10 mg/km/t | |
| 75.4 mg/km/t | +19.40 mg/km/t | |
| 83.9 mg/km/t | +27.90 mg/km/t | |
| 88.1 mg/km/t | +32.10 mg/km/t | |
| 98.5 mg/km/t | +42.50 mg/km/t |
The difference between best and worst was 75.9% (42.5 mg/km/t).
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Wet Braking
- 49.7 → 0.0 mph
- Snow Braking
- 18.6 → 0.0 mph
- Ice Braking
- 12.4 → 0.0 mph
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2024 Winter 55 Tire Braking Test
205/55 R1655 tires tested
10 of these 15 tires tested again
2022 Winter Tire Market Overview
215/55 R1756 tires tested
10 of these 15 tires tested again
2023 Winter Tire Test 54 Set Braking Test
225/45 R1854 tires tested
9 of these 15 tires tested again

