Performance Overview
This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.
Dry Performance Overview
Dry Braking (M)
Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)
Wet Performance Overview
Wet Braking (M)
Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)
Straight Aqua (Km/H)
Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)
Curved Aquaplaning (m/sec2)
Remaining lateral acceleration (Higher is better)
Snow Performance Overview
Snow Braking (M)
Snow braking in meters (Lower is better)
Snow Traction (N)
Pulling Force in Newtons (Higher is better)
Ice Performance Overview
Ice Braking (M)
Ice braking in meters (Lower is better)
Comfort Performance Overview
Noise (dB)
External noise in dB (Lower is better)
Value Performance Overview
Wear (KM)
Predicted tread life in KM (Higher is better)
Value (Price/1000)
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear (Lower is better)
Price
Price in local currency (Lower is better)
Fuel Consumption (l/100km)
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km (Lower is better)
Abrasion (mg/km/t)
Weight of Tire Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t) (Lower is better)
Overall Findings
Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:
| Position | Tire | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Continental WinterContact TS 870 | 95.2% | |
| 2 | Kumho Winter Craft WP52 | 94.8% |
| 3 | Hankook Winter I cept RS3 | 94.5% |
| 4 | Michelin Alpin 6 | 94.2% |
| 5 | Dunlop Winter Sport 5 | 93.6% |
| 6 | Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 | 92.5% |
| 7 | Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus | 92% |
| 8 | Semperit Speed Grip 5 | 91.8% |
| 9 | Apollo Aspire XP Winter | 91.1% |
| 10 | Vredestein Wintrac Pro | 91% |
| 11 | Sava Eskimo HP2 | 90.8% |
| 12 | Giti GitiWinterW2 | 90.7% |
| 13 | Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 | 90.5% |
| 14 | Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906 | 89.1% |
| 15 | Nokian WR Snowproof | 89% |
Test Winner
Nokian WR Snowproof
89%