2023 Tire Reviews All Season Tire Test

Below are all the data points for the 2023 Tire Reviews All Season Tire Test, displaying how each tire performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tire's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Reference Tires: Reference tires are highlighted with a yellow background and are included as benchmarks rather than competitive entries.
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
Kleber Quadraxer 3
Vredestein Quatrac
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2
Toyo Celsius AS2
Leao iGreen AllSeason
Hankook Winter I cept RS3 (Reference)
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 (Reference)

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin CrossClimate 2 with a result of 38.25 M. The difference between best and worst was 16.7%. The Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 [reference tire] was 2.8% better than the best competitive tire.

Dry Handling (s)

Dry handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: All the tires in the dry handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Subj. Dry Handling ( Points)

Subjective Dry Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 with a result of 100 Points. The difference between best and worst was 20%.

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Hankook Kinergy 4S2 with a result of 29.56 M. The difference between best and worst was 23.4%. The Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 [reference tire] was 3.2% better than the best competitive tire.

Wet Handling (s)

Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 with a result of 57.97 s. The difference between best and worst was 11%. The best competitive tire was 1.3% better than Hankook Winter I cept RS3 [reference tire].

Subj. Wet Handling ( Points)

Subjective Wet Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 with a result of 100 Points. The difference between best and worst was 30%.

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2 with a result of 94.3 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 6.2%. The best competitive tire was 3.1% better than Hankook Winter I cept RS3 [reference tire].

Snow Performance Overview

Snow Braking (M)

Snow braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin CrossClimate 2 with a result of 18.21 M. The difference between best and worst was 8.2%. The Hankook Winter I cept RS3 [reference tire] was 3.5% better than the best competitive tire.

Snow Traction (s)

Snow acceleration time (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin CrossClimate 2 with a result of 5.57 s. The difference between best and worst was 13.9%. The Hankook Winter I cept RS3 [reference tire] was 3.4% better than the best competitive tire.

Snow Handling (s)

Snow handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Kleber Quadraxer 3 with a result of 84.22 s. The difference between best and worst was 5.4%. The Hankook Winter I cept RS3 [reference tire] was 2.2% better than the best competitive tire.

Subj. Snow Handling ( Points)

Subjective Snow Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Kleber Quadraxer 3 with a result of 100 Points. The difference between best and worst was 10%.

Comfort Performance Overview

Subj. Comfort ( Points)

Subjective Comfort Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 with a result of 100 Points. The difference between best and worst was 10%. The best competitive tire was 2% better than Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 [reference tire].

Value Performance Overview

Price

Price in local currency (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Leao iGreen AllSeason. The difference between best and worst was 26.2%. The best competitive tire was 5.8% better than Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 [reference tire].

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Leao iGreen AllSeason with a result of 7.55 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 14.7%. The best competitive tire was 1.6% better than Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 [reference tire].

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Reference Tires: Reference tires (highlighted with yellow background) are included as benchmarks rather than competitive entries. They typically show as 0% in overall scoring as they are not part of the final ranking.
Position Tire Score
1 Michelin CrossClimate 2 97.8%
2 Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 97.1%
3 Hankook Kinergy 4S2 96.9%
4 Kleber Quadraxer 3 96.7%
5 Vredestein Quatrac 95%
6 Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 94.7%
7 Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 93.3%
8 Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2 92.2%
9 Toyo Celsius AS2 91.9%
10 Leao iGreen AllSeason 86.6%
- Hankook Winter I cept RS3 (Reference) 0%
- Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 (Reference) 0%

Test Winner

Michelin CrossClimate 2
Michelin CrossClimate 2

97.8%

comments powered by Disqus