Data Explorer / Vi Bilagare
2019 Studded Winter Tire Test
- Tested size
- 225/50 R17
- Tires tested
- 8
- Disciplines
- 11
Set the weightings
Move a slider. The other categories rebalance automatically to keep the total at 100%.
No test-specific category weights are recorded; this starts with season defaults.
Season defaults
Results
Movement is compared with the default calculation, not the published finishing order. Scores use unrounded totals for ranking.
No ranking for this setup. Give at least one category a positive weight and include a discipline in each active category, or reset the weights.
Filtering never changes the benchmark, scores or positions.
No tires selected. Add tires to your shortlist to focus the ranking.
| ft ↓ | Points ↑ | ft ↓ | s ↓ | mph ↑ | ft ↓ | s ↓ | s ↓ | ft ↓ | s ↓ | s ↓ | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 96.29 | 147 | 2 | 86.3 | 94 | 44.12 | 37.5 | 98.7 | 55 | 4.06 | 83.75 | 99.6 | 28 | 4.14 | 52.64 | 99.2 | |
StrengthsHigh grip on snow and ice, low noise. ConsiderationsWeak subjective dry handling. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry86.29 × 22% = 18.98 Wet98.73 × 39% = 38.5 Snow99.56 × 33% = 32.85 Ice99.19 × 6% = 5.95 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | 2 | 94.82 | 153 | 5 | 93.4 | 102 | 44.37 | 36.1 | 94.9 | 59 | 4.17 | 86.49 | 95.9 | 31 | 4.51 | 52.89 | 93.6 | |
StrengthsHigh grip on snow and ice, good handling, low noise. ConsiderationsWeak aquaplaning resistance. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry93.43 × 22% = 20.55 Wet94.9 × 39% = 37.01 Snow95.87 × 33% = 31.64 Ice93.63 × 6% = 5.62 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | 4 | 94.21 | 141 | 2 | 89.8 | 102 | 45.65 | 35.4 | 93.5 | 55 | 4.05 | 85.59 | 99.2 | 35 | 5.16 | 51.35 | 87.2 | |
StrengthsHigh grip in the snow, good handling on uneven ice, low noise. ConsiderationsRelatively poor in dry and wet, weak aquaplaning resistance. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry89.8 × 22% = 19.76 Wet93.51 × 39% = 36.47 Snow99.25 × 33% = 32.75 Ice87.18 × 6% = 5.23 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 4 | 5 | 93.87 | 155 | 3 | 86.0 | 98 | 43.18 | 35.7 | 97.5 | 59 | 4.23 | 87.54 | 94.8 | 32 | 4.27 | 53.92 | 93.9 | |
StrengthsGood handling and high grip on snow and ice. ConsiderationsWeak aquaplaning resistance, moderate Noise. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry85.98 × 22% = 18.92 Wet97.51 × 39% = 38.03 Snow94.83 × 33% = 31.29 Ice93.88 × 6% = 5.63 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 5 | 7 | 92.20 | 157 | 3 | 84.9 | 103 | 43.71 | 38.6 | 95.7 | 59 | 4.27 | 87.93 | 94.2 | 36 | 4.94 | 55.52 | 85.0 | |
StrengthsHigh resistance to aquaplaning. ConsiderationsHigh noise levels, long wet braking. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry84.87 × 22% = 18.67 Wet95.74 × 39% = 37.34 Snow94.22 × 33% = 31.09 Ice85.05 × 6% = 5.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 6 | 3 | 94.37 | 152 | 4 | 90.8 | 98 | 43.59 | 37.8 | 97.8 | 59 | 4.20 | 89.15 | 94.5 | 36 | 5.03 | 56.63 | 84.2 | |
StrengthsGood driving performance in the dry, good traction and braking in the snow. ConsiderationsWeak lateral stability on snow and ice, high rolling resistance. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry90.85 × 22% = 19.99 Wet97.84 × 39% = 38.16 Snow94.46 × 33% = 31.17 Ice84.21 × 6% = 5.05 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 7 | 6 | 92.48 | 157 | 4 | 88.0 | 101 | 43.64 | 36.2 | 95.9 | 60 | 4.40 | 88.07 | 92.7 | 36 | 4.88 | 55.94 | 85.4 | |
StrengthsLow rolling resistance. ConsiderationsLong dry braking. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry87.95 × 22% = 19.35 Wet95.91 × 39% = 37.4 Snow92.73 × 33% = 30.6 Ice85.38 × 6% = 5.12 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 8 | 8 | 88.20 | 158 | 2 | 80.8 | 103 | 44.00 | 36.4 | 94.9 | 63 | 4.57 | 93.63 | 88.4 | 46 | 6.58 | 60.11 | 70.1 | |
StrengthsNon mentioned. ConsiderationsVery poor grip on snow and ice, poor handling in the dry and wet. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry80.84 × 22% = 17.79 Wet94.95 × 39% = 37.03 Snow88.42 × 33% = 29.18 Ice70.06 × 6% = 4.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Raw results do not change when you move the sliders. Scroll horizontally to see every discipline.
Leading with these priorities
Continental IceContact 3
These are calculated scenarios, not new test awards. The published verdict may reflect judgement, close results and factors outside this calculation.
Not ranked: a measurement needed for these weights is missing. Missing results are not treated as zero or redistributed.
Reference tires provide context only. They do not set the benchmark and cannot win the personalised ranking.
Weighting vs real impact
What decides this ranking
The weighting is how much each category counts. The real impact is how much of the difference between the tires it creates: a discipline in which every tire performed about the same barely changes the order, however much it counts.
No weighting is recorded for this test, so the weighting here starts from Tire Reviews’ season defaults, not from the test’s own scoring.
- Dry Weighting 22% Real impact 46%
- Wet Weighting 39% Real impact 22%
- Snow Weighting 33% Real impact 20%
- Ice Weighting 6% Real impact 12%
- Subj. Dry Handling counts for 3.7% of the score but creates 31% of the difference between the tires, because their results in it were far apart.
- Wet Handling counts for 17.2% of the score but creates only 4% of the difference, because most tires performed about the same in it.
Every discipline 11
| Discipline | Weighting | Real impact |
|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | 18.3% | 15% |
| Subj. Dry Handling | 3.7% | 31% |
| Wet Braking | 17.6% | 14% |
| Wet Handling | 17.2% | 4% |
| Straight Aqua | 4.3% | 4% |
| Snow Braking | 9.9% | 6% |
| Snow Traction | 11.6% | 9% |
| Snow Handling | 11.6% | 6% |
| Ice Braking | 2% | 5% |
| Ice Traction | 2% | 5% |
| Ice Handling | 2% | 2% |
How it is worked out: each discipline’s weighting is multiplied by the spread of its results (the gap across the middle half of the tires, as a percentage of the best result), then shared out so that all the disciplines add up to 100%. It estimates what separates the tires; it is not a second set of weights, and it follows the weights you set.
How your ranking is calculated
Each discipline is scored against the best non-reference tire in the full test field: best ÷ result × 100 when lower is better, or result ÷ best × 100 when higher is better. Discipline scores are rounded to two decimal places, then combined using your weights.
Within-category weights divide that category’s share of the overall score. A 50% wet category and 40% wet-braking share give wet braking 20% of the total. A weight is a scoring priority, not a measure of its actual effect on the ranking: the performance gaps matter too. What decides this ranking ↑
Published joint positions are preserved separately. Calculated positions tie only when their underlying scores match; two displayed scores can look equal after rounding.
A zero weight excludes that category or discipline. At least one active discipline is required, and the disciplines in every active category must have a positive total.
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tire Test
205/55 R1620 tires tested
6 of these 8 tires tested again
2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tire Test
205/55 R1616 tires tested
5 of these 8 tires tested again
2020 Studded Winter Tire Test
205/60 R168 tires tested
4 of these 8 tires tested again
