Finnish magazine Moottori have recently compared eight 205/55 R16 tire patterns which sit in the midrange price category!
While midrange tires are cheaper than their premium rivals, they're not the cheapest tires available on market, so in theory should still provide a reasonable level of performance, just offering better value.
The full test data is below, and it's a shame Moottori didn't include a premium tire as a reference to see exactly what performances change as the price gets cheaper.
It's also worth noting, Semperit is owned by Continental, Kleber by Michelin and Goodyear owns Debica.
Dry
During dry testing, the Semperit SpeedLife 2 offered the most grip during the dry braking testing, and the Nokian and Kleber proved to have the best subjective handling. Interestingly Moottori didn't offer the dry handling laptimes.
Dry Braking
Spread: 1.13 M (4.5%)|Avg: 25.33 M
Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)
Dry Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tire
Subj. Dry Handling
Spread: 2.00 Points (22.2%)|Avg: 8.31 Points
Subjective Dry Handling Score (Higher is better)
Kleber Dynaxer HP 3
9.00 Points
Nokian Nordman SX2
9.00 Points
Semperit SpeedLife 2
8.80 Points
Maxxis Premitra HP5
8.40 Points
Sumitomo BC100
8.20 Points
Dayton Touring 2
8.10 Points
Debica Presto HP
8.00 Points
Cooper Zeon CS8
7.00 Points
Wet
Semperit continued its strong performance in the wet, offering the highest grip in wet braking and handling, which isn't a huge surprise given Semperit is own by wet weather kings, Continental. As in the dry testing, Maxxis was again extremely close to Semperit.
Wet Braking
Spread: 2.90 M (10.4%)|Avg: 29.34 M
Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)
Wet Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tire
Wet Handling
Spread: 2.50 s (4.3%)|Avg: 58.78 s
Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)
Maxxis Premitra HP5
57.70 s
Semperit SpeedLife 2
57.70 s
Nokian Nordman SX2
58.00 s
Debica Presto HP
58.10 s
Cooper Zeon CS8
58.40 s
Sumitomo BC100
59.90 s
Kleber Dynaxer HP 3
60.20 s
Dayton Touring 2
60.20 s
Subj. Wet Handling
Spread: 1.00 Points (11.2%)|Avg: 8.40 Points
Subjective Wet Handling Score (Higher is better)
Debica Presto HP
8.90 Points
Kleber Dynaxer HP 3
8.60 Points
Maxxis Premitra HP5
8.50 Points
Semperit SpeedLife 2
8.50 Points
Nokian Nordman SX2
8.50 Points
Cooper Zeon CS8
8.40 Points
Dayton Touring 2
7.90 Points
Sumitomo BC100
7.90 Points
Straight Aqua
Spread: 7.30 Km/H (8.4%)|Avg: 80.83 Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)
Semperit SpeedLife 2
86.50 Km/H
Nokian Nordman SX2
80.50 Km/H
Debica Presto HP
80.20 Km/H
Dayton Touring 2
80.10 Km/H
Sumitomo BC100
80.10 Km/H
Kleber Dynaxer HP 3
80.00 Km/H
Maxxis Premitra HP5
80.00 Km/H
Cooper Zeon CS8
79.20 Km/H
Environment
Maxxis proved to have an excellent blend of wet performance and low rolling resistance.
Rolling Resistance
Spread: 1.49 kg / t (18.9%)|Avg: 8.50 kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)
Maxxis Premitra HP5
7.87 kg / t
Kleber Dynaxer HP 3
7.93 kg / t
Semperit SpeedLife 2
8.29 kg / t
Dayton Touring 2
8.40 kg / t
Nokian Nordman SX2
8.51 kg / t
Sumitomo BC100
8.65 kg / t
Debica Presto HP
8.96 kg / t
Cooper Zeon CS8
9.36 kg / t
19,000 km
£1.45/L
8.0 L/100km
--
Annual Difference
--
Lifetime Savings
--
Extra Fuel/Energy
--
Extra CO2
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.