Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild Sportscars

2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
255/35 R19
Tires tested
11
Disciplines
9

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
121 ft -11 ft
132 ft Best
134 ft +2 ft
135 ft +3 ft
135 ft +3 ft
137 ft +5 ft
137 ft +5 ft
138 ft +6 ft
139 ft +7 ft
141 ft +9 ft
143 ft +11 ft
144 ft +12 ft

The difference between best and worst was 19.6% (23 ft ≈ 1.6 Car Lengths).

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
77.4 mph +1.7 mph
75.7 mph Best
75.0 mph -0.7 mph
74.9 mph -0.8 mph
74.7 mph -1.0 mph
74.4 mph -1.3 mph
74.3 mph -1.4 mph
74.3 mph -1.4 mph
74.2 mph -1.5 mph
74.1 mph -1.6 mph
73.8 mph -1.9 mph
73.6 mph -2.1 mph

The difference between best and worst was 4.8% (3.8 mph).

Wet

3

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
150 ft Best
RefReference Summer
154 ft +4 ft
155 ft +5 ft
156 ft +6 ft
158 ft +8 ft
163 ft +13 ft
164 ft +14 ft
165 ft +15 ft
170 ft +20 ft
175 ft +25 ft
177 ft +27 ft
180 ft +30 ft

The difference between best and worst was 19.9% (30 ft ≈ 2 Car Lengths).

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
59.2 mph Best
RefReference Summer
59.0 mph -0.2 mph
59.0 mph -0.2 mph
57.9 mph -1.3 mph
57.7 mph -1.5 mph
57.7 mph -1.5 mph
57.2 mph -2.0 mph
56.9 mph -2.3 mph
56.9 mph -2.3 mph
56.3 mph -2.9 mph
56.0 mph -3.2 mph
55.9 mph -3.3 mph

The difference between best and worst was 5.7% (3.3 mph).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
45.8 mph Best
RefReference Summer
45.6 mph -0.2 mph
45.5 mph -0.3 mph
45.1 mph -0.7 mph
44.9 mph -0.9 mph
44.6 mph -1.2 mph
44.3 mph -1.5 mph
42.9 mph -2.9 mph
42.6 mph -3.2 mph
42.6 mph -3.2 mph
41.1 mph -4.7 mph
37.2 mph -8.6 mph

The difference between best and worst was 18.7% (8.6 mph).

Snow

2

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
91 ft Best
92 ft +1 ft
92 ft +1 ft
94 ft +3 ft
94 ft +3 ft
94 ft +3 ft
95 ft +4 ft
95 ft +4 ft
96 ft +5 ft
100 ft +9 ft
101 ft +10 ft
RefReference Summer
256 ft +165 ft

The difference between best and worst was 182.2% (165 ft ≈ 11.2 Car Lengths).

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
30.7 mph Best
30.5 mph -0.2 mph
30.4 mph -0.3 mph
30.4 mph -0.3 mph
30.3 mph -0.4 mph
30.3 mph -0.4 mph
30.1 mph -0.6 mph
29.6 mph -1.1 mph
29.5 mph -1.2 mph
28.9 mph -1.8 mph
28.0 mph -2.7 mph

The difference between best and worst was 8.9% (2.7 mph).

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
70.7 dB Best
71.1 dB +0.40 dB
72 dB +1.30 dB
72.2 dB +1.50 dB
72.5 dB +1.80 dB
RefReference Summer
72.6 dB +1.90 dB
73.5 dB +2.80 dB
73.7 dB +3.00 dB
74.1 dB +3.40 dB
74.9 dB +4.20 dB
75 dB +4.30 dB
75.7 dB +5.00 dB

The difference between best and worst was 7.1% (5 dB).

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
8.06 kg/t Best $0
8.5 kg/t +0.44 kg/t $16
8.5 kg/t +0.44 kg/t $16
8.66 kg/t +0.60 kg/t $22
RefReference Summer
8.8 kg/t +0.74 kg/t $27
9.02 kg/t +0.96 kg/t $35
9.25 kg/t +1.19 kg/t $43
9.35 kg/t +1.29 kg/t $47
9.39 kg/t +1.33 kg/t $48
9.99 kg/t +1.93 kg/t $70
10.32 kg/t +2.26 kg/t $82
10.35 kg/t +2.29 kg/t $83

The difference between best and worst was 28.4% (2.29 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Hankook Winter i cept evo2 uses about 23 gal ($83) more fuel than the Continental WinterContact TS 860 S.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.