2018 EVO UUHP Tire Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
August 21, 2018
Below are all the data points for the 2018 EVO UUHP Tire Test, displaying how each tire performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tire's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
Continental Sport Contact 6
Falken Azenis FK510
Toyo Proxes Sport

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental Sport Contact 6 with a result of 34 M. The difference between best and worst was 11.5%.

Dry Handling (s)

Dry handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental Sport Contact 6 with a result of 84.9 s. The difference between best and worst was 3.1%.

Subj. Dry Handling ( Points)

Subjective Dry Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental Sport Contact 6 with a result of 62 Points. The difference between best and worst was 29.8%.

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S with a result of 23.2 M. The difference between best and worst was 11.8%.

Wet Handling (s)

Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 with a result of 64.1 s. The difference between best and worst was 4%.

Subj. Wet Handling ( Points)

Subjective Wet Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 with a result of 62 Points. The difference between best and worst was 31.5%.

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 with a result of 86.3 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 7.5%.

Value Performance Overview

Price

Price in local currency (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Toyo Proxes Sport. The difference between best and worst was 36.9%.

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 with a result of 8.76 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 8.8%.

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tire Score
1 Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S 0%
2 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 0%
3 Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 0%
4 Continental Sport Contact 6 0%
5 Falken Azenis FK510 0%
6 Toyo Proxes Sport 0%

Similar Tire Tests

Show All summer tire tests
2025 Autobild Sports Cars UUHP Tire Test
May 2025 295/30 R20 Continental SportContact 7 7 tires
2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tire Test
March 2025 205/55 R16 Continental UltraContact NXT 7 tires
2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tire Test
March 2025 225/45 R17 Michelin Primacy 5 14 tires
2025 AMS Sustainability Tire Test
March 2025 215/55 R17 Continental UltraContact NXT 6 tires
2025 Sports Cars Tire Test
March 2025 245/35 R19 Continental SportContact 7 8 tires
2025 Sport Auto UUHP Tire Test
March 2025 285/30 R20 Continental SportContact 7 4 tires
comments powered by Disqus