Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 vs Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
In the 12 independent tests that ran both tires, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 finished ahead 12 times and the EUROALL SEASON AS210 not once. The Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was stronger in dry, wet, snow, ice, comfort and value.
Performance profile
20 measurements from the 12 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
EUROALL SEASON AS210
Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 92%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 12 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
EUROALL SEASON AS210
Not ahead in any category
Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
EUROALL SEASON AS210
Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the EUROALL SEASON AS210 80% from 33 reviews and the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 82% from 81. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tire did better.
| Measurement | EUROALL SEASON AS210 | Gap | Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking - Cool ft | 135 | 0.7% | 135 | 0-1 |
| Dry Braking ft | 141 | 0.9% | 140 | 1-11 |
| Dry Handling - Cool s | 77.4 | 1% | 76.6 | 0-1 |
| Dry Handling (s) | 75.2 | 0.8% | 74.55 | 0-3 |
| Dry Handling (mph) | 58.4 | 0.4% | 58.6 | 1-4 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | scored | 5.3% | scored | 0-1 |
| Wet Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking ft | 155 | 3.5% | 149 | 2-10 |
| Wet Braking - Cool ft | 215 | 9.6% | 194 | 0-1 |
| Wet Braking - Concrete ft | 128 | 2.8% | 131 | 1-0 |
| Wet Handling - Cool s | 93.9 | 3.6% | 90.5 | 0-1 |
| Wet Handling (s) | 73.99 | 0.6% | 73.66 | 1-2 |
| Wet Handling (mph) | 45.1 | 1.5% | 45.8 | 1-4 |
| Subj. Wet Handling pts | scored | 11.1% | scored | 0-1 |
| Wet Circle s | 14.05 | 0.7% | 13.94 | 1-2 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 50.5 | 1.2% | 51.1 | 3-6 |
| Curved Aquaplaning ft/s² | 12.8 | 12.7% | 14.4 | 0-3 |
| Snow Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking ft | 86 | 2.6% | 84 | 2-7 |
| Snow Traction s | 6.15 | 4% | 6.46 | 1-1 |
| Snow Traction (lbf) | 565 | 4.7% | 588 | 1-5 |
| Snow Handling s | 78.9 | 1.6% | 77.03 | 1-2 |
| Snow Handling (mph) | 29.8 | 2.5% | 30.6 | 0-5 |
| Subj. Snow Handling pts | scored | 6.5% | scored | 0-1 |
| Snow Slalom ft/s² | 13.7 | 6.9% | 14.6 | 0-2 |
| Ice Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 ahead | ||||
| Ice Braking ft | 67 | 8.8% | 61 | 0-1 |
| Comfort Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 ahead | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | 8.7% | scored | 0-1 |
| Noise dB | 71.61 | 0.9 dB | 70.71 | 1-7 |
| Tire Weight lb | 9,859 | 12% | 8,394 | 0-2 |
| Value Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 ahead | ||||
| Wear miles | 33,093 | 18.4% | 38,203 | 0-4 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 8.87 | 9.7% | 8 | 0-8 |
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.6 | 1% | 5.54 | 0-1 |
| Abrasion (Gram/1000km) | 16.3 | 1.8% | 16.6 | 1-0 |
| Abrasion (mg/km/t) | 74 | 23% | 57 | 0-1 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 12 tests, 2020 to 2024
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | EUROALL SEASON AS210 | Field | Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tire Test | P9 of 12 | P3 of 12 | |
| 2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test | P7 of 16 | P1 of 16 | |
| 2023 Tire Reviews All Season Tire Test | P7 of 10 | P2 of 10 | |
| 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test | P8 of 15 | P1 of 15 | |
| 2022 All Season Tire Market Overview | P11 of 35 | P6 of 35 | |
| 2022/23 Tire Reviews All Season Tire Test | P6 of 10 | P3 of 10 | |
| 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test | P5 of 16 | P1 of 16 | |
| 2021 All Season Tire Market Overview | P5 of 32 | P3 of 32 | |
| 2021 AZ All Season Tire Test | P8 of 9 | P3 of 9 | |
| 2020 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tire Test | P6 of 11 | P3 of 11 | |
| 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test | P5 of 14 | P1 of 14 | |
| 2020 All Season Tire Market Overview - 32 Tire Braking Test | P11 of 32 | P4 of 32 |
EUROALL SEASON AS210 vs Vector 4Seasons Gen 3: your questions
Is the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 or the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 the better tire?
In the 12 independent tests that ran both tires, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 finished ahead 12 times and the EUROALL SEASON AS210 not once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 8.1 and the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 9.4 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the EUROALL SEASON AS210 or the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3?
The Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 led 30 of the 40 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3.5% shorter in the wet across 12 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 led 21 of the 23 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 0.9% shorter in the dry across 12 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 led 23 of the 28 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.6% shorter on snow across 9 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 lasted 18.4% longer in the wear tests (4 tests), had 9.7% lower rolling resistance (8 tests) and used 1% less fuel (2 tests). Owners rate wear 8.7/10 for the EUROALL SEASON AS210 and 8.6/10 for the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was 0.9 dB quieter (8 tests). Owners rate comfort 7.8/10 for the EUROALL SEASON AS210 and 8.3/10 for the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the EUROALL SEASON AS210 80% from 33 reviews and the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 82% from 81. 84% of EUROALL SEASON AS210 owners would buy it again, against 78% for the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.
Which is more expensive?
In the 8 tests that listed prices, the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was the dearer tire in 8 of them, by 16.8% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The EUROALL SEASON AS210 is made in 93 sizes (13 to 20 inch) and the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 in 102 (14 to 22 inch). 62 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the EUROALL SEASON AS210 is graded B for wet grip and D for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 B and C.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
15-1 in 17 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
7-19 in 26 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
2-13 in 15 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2
15-10 in 25 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Hankook iON FlexClimate
0-2 in 2 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
14-7 in 21 shared tests
vs
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
5-11 in 16 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Vredestein Quatrac
5-11 in 16 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Review the EUROALL SEASON AS210 Review the Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.