Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
If you value shortest dry and snow stops, CrossClimate 2 is repeatedly the benchmark-often by meaningful margins of 8-13% in dry braking and consistent wins in snow traction/handling. If your priority is confidence in the rain and stable, predictable control, the Goodyear tends to feel more planted, regularly topping wet handling and curved aquaplaning, and often bringing lower ownership costs in wear and price.
Test Results
Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been twenty-five tests which compare both tires directly!
| Tire | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 | seven | |
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 | eighteen |
While it might look like the Michelin CrossClimate 2 is better than the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.
Key Strengths
- Outstanding wet handling and lateral grip; frequent wins in wet handling and wet circle
- Strong curved aquaplaning resistance and stable rain behavior
- Often better wear and value; lower purchase price and longer mileage in several tests
- Comfortable and composed feel with good feedback; balanced winter braking/ice braking
- Class-leading dry braking across virtually every test
- Best-in-class winter ability: snow traction/handling and short snow stops
- Low rolling resistance with fuel-saving potential
- Quiet, refined, and consistently high overall rankings
Dry Braking
Looking at data from twenty-five tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during twenty-five dry braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 9.51% less distance than the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.
Best In Dry Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during three dry handling [s] tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was 0.55% faster around a lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from twelve tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during eight dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was 0.22% faster around a lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 scored 5% more points than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from twenty-five tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during sixteen wet braking tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 stopped the vehicle in 0.93% less distance than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Best In Wet Braking: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Cool
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one wet braking - cool tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 0.9% less distance than the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.
Best In Wet Braking - Cool: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Wet Braking - Cool winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during two wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 stopped the vehicle in 3.06% less distance than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during five wet handling [s] tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was 2.83% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from twelve tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during twelve wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was 2.83% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 scored 8% more points than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during four wet circle tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 had 3.61% higher lateral wet grip than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Best In Wet Circle: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from twenty-one tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during fifteen straight aqua tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 floated at a 1.55% higher speed than the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.
Best In Straight Aqua: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from fifteen tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during ten curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 slipped out at a 0.58% higher speed than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Snow Braking
Looking at data from twenty-one tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during fourteen snow braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 1.45% less distance than the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.
Best In Snow Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from six tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during six snow traction tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 accelerated 7.61% faster than the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.
Best In Snow Traction: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from fourteen tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during eleven snow traction tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had 1.95% better snow traction than the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.
Best In Snow Traction: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [s]
Looking at data from six tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during six snow handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 2.83% faster around a lap than the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.
Best In Snow Handling [s]: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from twelve tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during eleven snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 2.1% faster around a lap than the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.
Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Snow Handling
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two subj. snow handling tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 scored 2.58% more points than the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.
Best In Subj. Snow Handling: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Subj. Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Circle
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two snow circle tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 provided 1.94% more lateral grip than the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.
Best In Snow Circle: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Snow Circle winner was calculated >>
Snow Slalom
Looking at data from nine tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during nine snow slalom tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 6.15% faster through a slalom than the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.
Best In Snow Slalom: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>
Ice Braking
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during two ice braking tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 stopped the vehicle 3.47% shorter than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Best In Ice Braking: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
See how the Ice Braking winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during three subj. comfort tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 scored 1.89% more points than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from sixteen tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during eleven noise tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 measured 0.78% quieter than the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.
Best In Noise: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during one noise tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 measured 0.14% quieter than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Best In Noise: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Tire Weight
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during three tire weight tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 weighed 4.2% less than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Best In Tire Weight: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
See how the Tire Weight winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from six tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during five wear tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 is predicted to cover 14.04% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Best In Wear: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during four value tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 proved to have a 18.45% better value based on price/1000km than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Best In Value: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Price
Looking at data from seven tire tests, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was better during six price tests. On average the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 cost 10.84% less than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Best In Price: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
See how the Price winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from seventeen tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during fifteen rolling resistance tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had a 7.21% lower rolling resistance than the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during four fuel consumption tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 used 1.83% less fuel than the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 emitted 13.86% less particle wear matter than the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.
Best In Abrasion: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 lost 13.89% less particle wear matter than the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.
Best In Abrasion: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 Driver Reviews
Across most reviews, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 is described as a highly capable all-round tire with standout wet-road security (strong grip, wet braking, and aquaplaning resistance) and confidence in cold conditions including snow for an all-season. Many drivers also report very good longevity/wear and a generally quiet, comfortable ride. The most repeated drawbacks are a softer, less precise steering/feedback feel and slightly weaker dry braking/traction when pushed in warm or hot conditions compared with dedicated summer tires.
Based on 68 reviews with an average rating of 81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 Driver Reviews
Across 129 reviews, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 is most often described as a highly confidence-inspiring all-weather tire with standout snow/slush capability and strong dry braking/handling for its category, letting many drivers avoid seasonal tire swaps. Comfort and cabin refinement are frequently praised, with many finding it quieter and smoother than prior summer or OEM tires, and tread life is commonly reported as good when aligned/rotated. The main recurring drawbacks are mixed wet-road feedback (a meaningful minority report reduced wet grip or aquaplaning confidence, sometimes worsening with wear), plus reports of higher noise on certain surfaces/with age, a small fuel/EV range penalty, and premium pricing.
Based on 140 reviews with an average rating of 81%
Just after switching to the... Continue reading this review using the link below
Conclusion
Choose Michelin CrossClimate 2 if you frequently face variable temperatures with regular snow/ice or you prize the shortest emergency stops in the dry-it's the all-season that feels closest to a winter tire without giving up summer-road stopping power. Choose Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 if you drive mostly in mild/wet climates, want the most confidence mid-corner in rain, and care about total cost of ownership through longer life and sharper value. The memorable takeaway: Michelin is the dry-and-snow stopper; Goodyear is the wet-road controller and value play.
Key Differences
- Dry braking: Michelin shorter by ~8-13% in most sizes/tests
- Wet handling: Goodyear consistently quicker/more stable; Michelin can understeer
- Aquaplaning: Goodyear often better in curved; Michelin typically ahead in straight line
- Winter: Michelin leads snow traction/handling; Goodyear occasionally matches braking/ice
- Efficiency: Michelin generally lower rolling resistance; Goodyear often better wear
- Value: Goodyear usually cheaper with longer mileage; Michelin carries a higher price
Overall Winner: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.
Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.