Giti GitiWinterW2 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
- TR Score
- 7.8/10
- Owners say
- 86% · 1
- TR Score
- 9.2/10
- Owners say
- 86% · 23
In the 6 independent tests that ran both tires, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 finished ahead 6 times and the GitiWinterW2 not once. The GitiWinterW2 resisted straight aquaplaning at a 3.7% higher speed; the Winter i cept evo3 had 7.7% lower rolling resistance.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose Hankook for the safest, most rounded winter performance, especially in wet, snowy and mixed conditions with strong longevity. Choose Giti if you prioritize hydroplaning resistance, low noise and a lower upfront price in milder winter use.
Where the GitiWinterW2 is stronger
- Excellent straight-line aquaplaning resistance across tests
- Lower exterior noise levels
- Competitive dry handling feel in some tests and strong subjective wet balance
Where the Winter i cept evo3 is stronger
- Consistently shorter wet, snow and ice braking distances
- Better snow traction and more composed winter handling
- Lower rolling resistance and significantly higher predicted mileage
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
GitiWinterW2 vs Winter i cept evo3 at a glance
| Category | GitiWinterW2 | Gap | Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won6 shared tests | 0 | 6 | |
| Dry8 measurements | 2 | The Winter i cept evo3 stopped 1.9% shorter in the dry (4 tests) | 5 |
| Wet20 measurements | 7 | The Winter i cept evo3 stopped 3.9% shorter in the wet (6 tests) | 12 |
| Snow15 measurements | 1 | The Winter i cept evo3 stopped 2.3% shorter on snow (6 tests) | 14 |
| Ice1 measurement | 0 | 1 | |
| Comfort4 measurements | 3 | The GitiWinterW2 was 2.3 dB quieter (3 tests) | 1 |
| Value6 measurements | 0 | The Winter i cept evo3 had 7.7% lower rolling resistance (3 tests) | 6 |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 7.8/10 | The Winter i cept evo3 by 1.4 | 9.2/10 |
| Owner rating1 and 23 reviews | 86% | Too close to call | 86% |
| Pricein the 4 tests that listed prices | Cheaper | The Winter i cept evo3 was dearer in 3 of 4 | +4.4% |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 57 | 12 sizes made in both | 86 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 6 tests, 2023 to 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | GitiWinterW2 | Field | Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Winter Tire Braking Test - 52 Sets! | P24 of 51 | P14 of 51 | |
| 2025 ADAC Winter Tire Test | P16 of 31 | P4 of 31 | |
| 2024 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test | P8 of 12 | P5 of 12 | |
| 2023 Sport Auto Winter Tire Test | P8 of 9 | P6 of 9 | |
| 2023 Winter Tire Test 54 Set Braking Test | P28 of 54 | P8 of 54 | |
| 2023 Tire Reviews Winter Tire Test | P7 of 11 | P4 of 11 |
Performance profile
12 measurements from the 6 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
GitiWinterW2
Winter i cept evo3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 95%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 15 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
GitiWinterW2
Winter i cept evo3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | GitiWinterW2 | Gap | Winter i cept evo3 | Wins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 144 | 1.9% | 142 | 1-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 71.59 | 0.1% | 71.68 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 70.2 | 0.6% | 70.6 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | = | scored | 0-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 113 | 3.9% | 109 | 0-6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 131 | 6.3% | 123 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 58.2 | 0.1% | 58.15 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 50.3 | 0.5% | 50.1 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | = | scored | 0-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11.7 | 4.2% | 11.4 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 16.26 | 1.5% | 16.02 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 51.6 | 3.7% | 49.9 | 4-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 9.2 | 12.8% | 10.4 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 77 | 2.3% | 75 | 0-6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6.09 | 7.2% | 5.65 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 219 | 2.6% | 224 | 0-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 87.61 | 2.7% | 85.24 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 35.7 | 2.3% | 36.5 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 3.3% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 14.4 | 5.8% | 13.6 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 58 | 2.2% | 57 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 5.6% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 72.43 | 2.3 dB | 74.7 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 27,154 | 65.7% | 44,987 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 9.06 | 7.7% | 8.36 | 0-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.8 | 1.7% | 5.7 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 86 | 34.9% | 56 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the GitiWinterW2 scores 7.8 and the Winter i cept evo3 9.2 out of 10.
| GitiWinterW2 | Category | Winter i cept evo3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53 | Dry | 77 | ||
| 78 | Wet | 89 | ||
| 47 | Comfort | 11 | ||
| 22 | Value | 57 | ||
| 41 | Snow | 68 | ||
| 25 | Ice | 63 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| GitiWinterW2 | Category | Winter i cept evo3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Dry Grip | 9 | ||
| 9 | Wet Grip | 9 | ||
| 9 | Road Feedback | 7.8 | ||
| 8 | Handling | 8.4 | ||
| 6 | Wear | 8.8 | ||
| 10 | Comfort | 7.8 | ||
| 10 | Snow Grip | 9.4 | ||
| 8 | Ice Grip | 8.5 | ||
Owners rate the GitiWinterW2 86% from 1 reviews and the Winter i cept evo3 86% from 23. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
- 86%from 23 reviews
- 91%would buy again
- 164,670 milesdriven by reviewers
Across 20 reviews, the Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 is described as a highly confidence-inspiring winter tire with standout traction in snow and strong, predictable grip in wet conditions (often praised for stability and aquaplaning resistance). Many drivers also report good dry-road handling for a winter tire and consider it excellent value versus premium brands. A smaller minority mention increased road noise or a firmer/less comfortable ride compared with their summer tires, but this is not the dominant experience.
- Excellent snow traction and confidence in winter conditions
- Strong wet grip and high aquaplaning resistance
- Stable, predictable handling and good road feedback
- Good comfort and generally low noise for a winter tire
- Some users find it noisier than summer tires or typical winter tire buzzing
Summarised by AI from 20 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 23 Winter i cept evo3 reviewsI used these Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 tires for 4 full winter seasons on a Jeep Compass 2.0 Multijet 4x4. They lasted for roughly 5,500 miles (around 8,900 km). The grip held up exceptionally well as they wore down, providing consistent traction and stability for an AWD SUV in various winter conditions. They offer great value and reliable performance, and I would absolutely buy them again.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tire: 57 sizes of the GitiWinterW2 and 86 of the Winter i cept evo3, 12 of them made in both.
| Category | GitiWinterW2 | Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Winter | Winter |
| Sizes made | 57 sizes, 13 to 21 inch | 86 sizes, 17 to 22 inch |
| Made in both | 12 sizes 215/60 R17225/60 R17215/50 R18215/55 R18225/40 R18225/45 R18225/50 R18235/45 R18245/45 R18225/40 R19245/45 R19255/40 R20 | |
| EU label wet grip | B96%A4% | B98%C1%D1% |
| EU label rolling resistance | D60%C29%E9%B2% | C57%D42%B1% |
| EU label noise | 68-74 dB A68%B32% | 70-75 dB B100% |
| Severe snow (3PMSF) sizes | 127 of 127 | 124 of 124 |
| On the market since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Replaced | Giti GitiWinterW1 (2017) | Hankook Winter i cept evo2 |
| Price in the shared tests | The Winter i cept evo3 was the dearer tire in 3 of the 4 tests that listed prices, by 4.4% on average. Each test priced the tires in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
This head-to-head pits the touring-focused Giti GitiWinterW2 against the ultra-high-performance Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 across six shared professional tests in 18-inch fitments. The Hankook consistently scores higher overall, driven by shorter braking distances on wet, snow and ice, plus strong efficiency and wear. The Giti counters with excellent straight-line aquaplaning resistance, lower exterior noise, and a friendlier price point.
If you prioritize confident stopping and balanced handling in typical winter slush, rain and packed snow, the Hankook trends ahead by meaningful margins. If your winters involve heavy standing water or you value quietness and lower upfront cost, the Giti offers targeted advantages despite longer braking in key scenarios.
Conclusion
Across tests from ADAC, Auto Bild, Sport Auto and Tire Reviews, the Hankook establishes a clear lead where safety matters most: wet and snow braking (wins in all shared events), plus better snow traction and consistently higher overall rankings. It further strengthens its case with notably lower rolling resistance and outstanding projected mileage (ADAC +66% vs Giti), improving long-term value despite the higher purchase price.
The Giti's story is about situational strengths: best-in-group straight aquaplaning speeds in most tests, quieter pass-by noise, and a lower price. However, its longer wet and dry braking distances and only satisfactory winter handling feedback limit its all-round appeal. For most drivers facing mixed winter conditions, Hankook is the safer, more durable and more efficient choice; Giti suits budget-conscious buyers prioritizing hydroplaning security and cabin calm.
GitiWinterW2 vs Winter i cept evo3: your questions
Is the Giti GitiWinterW2 or the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 the better tire?
In the 6 independent tests that ran both tires, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 finished ahead 6 times and the GitiWinterW2 not once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the GitiWinterW2 scores 7.8 and the Winter i cept evo3 9.2 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the GitiWinterW2 or the Winter i cept evo3?
The Winter i cept evo3 led 12 of the 20 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3.9% shorter in the wet across 6 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Winter i cept evo3 led 5 of the 8 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.9% shorter in the dry across 4 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The Winter i cept evo3 led 14 of the 15 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.3% shorter on snow across 6 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Winter i cept evo3 had 7.7% lower rolling resistance (3 tests). Owners rate wear 6/10 for the GitiWinterW2 and 8.8/10 for the Winter i cept evo3.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The GitiWinterW2 was 2.3 dB quieter (3 tests). Owners rate comfort 10/10 for the GitiWinterW2 and 7.8/10 for the Winter i cept evo3.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the GitiWinterW2 86% from 1 reviews and the Winter i cept evo3 86% from 23.
Which is more expensive?
In the 4 tests that listed prices, the Winter i cept evo3 was the dearer tire in 3 of them, by 4.4% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The GitiWinterW2 is made in 57 sizes (13 to 21 inch) and the Winter i cept evo3 in 86 (17 to 22 inch). 12 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the GitiWinterW2 is graded B for wet grip and D for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Winter i cept evo3 B and C.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52
5-1 in 6 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
1-18 in 20 shared tests
vs
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
12-0 in 13 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
8-5 in 14 shared tests
vs
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
13-3 in 17 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
6-0 in 6 shared tests
vs
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
2-6 in 9 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Uniroyal WinterExpert
5-1 in 6 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
Discussion