Menu

Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3

This head-to-head pits two ultra-high-performance winter staples against each other: the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 and the Hankook Winter i*cept evo3. Across nine shared tests from 2020-2025 in 18-19 inch fitments, both target sporty road cars needing dependable winter capability without sacrificing dry and wet road confidence. The latest ADAC 2025 test even scores them identically overall (4th/31), underscoring how closely matched they are.

Patterns emerge, though. Hankook typically stops shorter on dry and especially wet roads, while Dunlop edges ahead on ice and often holds small but consistent advantages in snow traction/handling, interior noise, and rolling resistance. Longevity swings by test: ADAC 2025 projects notably higher mileage and lower abrasion for Hankook, whereas several Auto Bild tests credit Dunlop with higher mileage and better value.
Winter-Sport-5 VS Winter-i-cept-evo3

Test Results

Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been nine tests which compare both tires directly!

Summary of nine total tests comparing both tires directly
TireTest WinsPerformance
Dunlop Winter Sport 5two
two wins
Hankook Winter i cept evo3six
six wins
one draws in one tests

While it might look like the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 is better than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.

Key Strengths

  • Stronger on snow/ice: repeated wins in snow traction/handling and better ice braking (ADAC 2025)
  • Lower rolling resistance in most tests, aiding fuel efficiency
  • Quieter in multiple programs (lower dB vs Hankook in 2024, 2025 samples)
  • Balanced, predictable handling with solid aquaplaning performance (notably straight-line in 2024)
  • Consistently shorter wet and dry braking across most years (notably 2020-2023, ADAC 2025 wet)
  • Very good aquaplaning safety margins, especially curved aquaplaning in several tests
  • Strong environmental showing in ADAC 2025: high predicted mileage and low abrasion
  • Competitive pricing/value in multiple tests

Dry Braking

Looking at data from six tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during four dry braking tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 stopped the vehicle in 1.69% less distance than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
43.78M
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
43.04M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
45.6M (+1.7M)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
43.9M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
40.39M (+1.28M)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
39.11M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
43.6M
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
43.9M (+0.3M)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
45.8M (+2M)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
43.8M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
43.3M
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
43.8M (+0.5M)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
44M (+0.3M)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
43.7M

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was 0.43% faster around a lap than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
46.01s
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
45.81s
Dry handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
46.01s (+0.2s)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
45.81s

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during three dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was 0.6% faster around a lap than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
105.05Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
105.68Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
109.5Km/H (-0.5Km/H)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
110Km/H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
99.3Km/H (-1.7Km/H)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
101Km/H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
110.4Km/H (-1.6Km/H)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
112Km/H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
101Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
99.7Km/H (-1.3Km/H)

Wet Braking

Looking at data from nine tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during seven wet braking tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 stopped the vehicle in 3.28% less distance than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
42.66M
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
41.26M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
35.2M (+2.9M)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
32.3M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
55M (+4.5M)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
50.5M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
30.36M (+0.75M)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
29.61M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
52.4M (+2.7M)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
49.7M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
35.3M
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
35.3M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
36.1M (+0.9M)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
35.2M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
56.4M (+1.4M)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
55M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
48.8M
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
50.8M (+2M)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
34.4M (+1.5M)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
32.9M

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 stopped the vehicle in 3.6% less distance than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
38.9M
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
37.5M
Wet braking on Concrete in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
38.9M (+1.4M)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
37.5M

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was 2.01% faster around a wet lap than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
50.72s
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
49.7s
Wet handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
50.72s (+1.02s)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
49.7s

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during three wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was 0.55% faster around a wet lap than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
77.05Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
77.48Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
71.7Km/H (-1.5Km/H)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
73.2Km/H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
70.3Km/H (-1.6Km/H)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
71.9Km/H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
84Km/H (-0.3Km/H)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
84.3Km/H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
82.2Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
80.5Km/H (-1.7Km/H)

Wet Circle

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 had 3.33% higher lateral wet grip than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
3m/s
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
2.9m/s
Lateral wet grip in m/s squared, higher is better

Best In Wet Circle: Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
3m/s
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
2.9m/s (-0.1m/s)

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from six tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during three straight aqua tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 floated at a 1.44% higher speed than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
85.47Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
86.72Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
89.7Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
88.6Km/H (-1.1Km/H)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
79.7Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
79.7Km/H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
90.4Km/H (-7Km/H)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
97.4Km/H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
90.6Km/H (-4.3Km/H)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
94.9Km/H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
89.2Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
85.7Km/H (-3.5Km/H)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
73.2Km/H (-0.8Km/H)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
74Km/H

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during three curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 slipped out at a 1.48% higher speed than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
23.31m/sec2
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
23.66m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
83.4m/sec2 (-1m/sec2)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
84.4m/sec2
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
3.84m/sec2 (-0.38m/sec2)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
4.22m/sec2
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
2.29m/sec2 (-0.59m/sec2)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
2.88m/sec2
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
3.69m/sec2
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
3.13m/sec2 (-0.56m/sec2)

Snow Braking

Looking at data from nine tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during four snow braking tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 stopped the vehicle in 0.16% less distance than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
25.19M
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
25.15M
Snow braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Snow Braking: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
25M
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
25M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
25M
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
25M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
16.4M (+0.13M)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
16.27M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
31.8M (+0.1M)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
31.7M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
26.5M
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
26.6M (+0.1M)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
30.7M (+0.4M)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
30.3M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
30.7M (+0.4M)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
30.3M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
31.1M
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
31.5M (+0.4M)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
9.5M
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
9.7M (+0.2M)

Snow Traction

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one snow traction tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 accelerated 0.19% faster than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
5.39s
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
5.38s
Snow acceleration time, lower is better

Best In Snow Traction: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
5.39s (+0.01s)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
5.38s

Snow Traction

Looking at data from five tire tests, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 was better during four snow traction tests. On average the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 had 1.57% better snow traction than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
2180.2N
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
2146N
Pulling Force in Newtons, higher is better

Best In Snow Traction: Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
2909N
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
2890N (-19N)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
2824N
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
2800N (-24N)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
2755N (-10N)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
2765N
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
2172N
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
2037N (-135N)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
241N
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
238N (-3N)

Snow Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one snow handling [s] tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was 1.38% faster around a lap than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
89.18s
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
87.95s
Snow handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Snow Handling [s]: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
89.18s (+1.23s)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
87.95s

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 was better during three snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 was 1.3% faster around a lap than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
56.13Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
55.4Km/H
Snow handling average speed, higher is better

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
61.5Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
60.2Km/H (-1.3Km/H)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
44.1Km/H (-0.5Km/H)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
44.6Km/H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
59.1Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
57.7Km/H (-1.4Km/H)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
59.8Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
59.1Km/H (-0.7Km/H)

Snow Circle

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 was better during one snow circle tests. On average the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 provided 1.04% more lateral grip than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
2.88ms/2
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
2.85ms/2
Lateral snow grip in m/s squared, higher is better

Best In Snow Circle: Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
2.88ms/2
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
2.85ms/2 (-0.03ms/2)

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during two snow slalom tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was 1.72% faster through a slalom than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
3.43m/sec2
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
3.49m/sec2
Lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Snow Slalom: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
3.71m/sec2 (-0.02m/sec2)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
3.73m/sec2
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
3.15m/sec2 (-0.1m/sec2)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
3.25m/sec2

Ice Braking

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 was better during one ice braking tests. On average the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 stopped the vehicle 3.45% shorter than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
16.8M
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
17.4M
Ice braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Ice Braking: Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
16.8M
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
17.4M (+0.6M)

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 scored 10% more points than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
10 Points
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
9 Points
Subjective Comfort Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Comfort: Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
10 Points
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
9 Points (-1 Points)

Noise

Looking at data from six tire tests, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 was better during three noise tests. On average the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 measured 0.54% quieter than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
73.67dB
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
74.07dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
74.8dB (+0.6dB)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
74.2dB
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
71.2dB
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
73.2dB (+2dB)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
75.4dB (+0.7dB)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
74.7dB
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
74.1dB (+0.3dB)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
73.8dB
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
72.4dB
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
73.2dB (+0.8dB)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
74.1dB
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
75.3dB (+1.2dB)

Wear

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one wear tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 is predicted to cover 2.24% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
47762.67KM
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
48859KM
Predicted tread life in KM, higher is better

Best In Wear: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
42640KM
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
39770KM (-2870KM)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
39348KM
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
34407KM (-4941KM)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
61300KM (-11100KM)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
72400KM

Value

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one value tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 proved to have a 3.04% better value based on price/1000km than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
14.82Price/1000
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
14.37Price/1000
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear, lower is better

Best In Value: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
14.77Price/1000 (+1.44Price/1000)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
13.33Price/1000
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
14.87Price/1000
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
15.4Price/1000 (+0.53Price/1000)

Price

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during two price tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 cost 14.83% less than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
345.94
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
294.62
Price in local currency, lower is better

Best In Price: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
101.87 (+7.63)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
94.24
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
590 (+95)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
495

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from five tire tests, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 was better during four rolling resistance tests. On average the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 had a 4.37% lower rolling resistance than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
8.53kg / t
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
8.92kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
7.59kg / t
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
8.59kg / t (+1kg / t)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
9.624kg / t
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
10.131kg / t (+0.51kg / t)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
8.51kg / t
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
8.74kg / t (+0.23kg / t)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
8.02kg / t
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
8.79kg / t (+0.77kg / t)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
8.89kg / t (+0.56kg / t)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
8.33kg / t

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 and Hankook Winter i cept evo3 performed equally well in fuel consumption tests.

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
5.7l/100km
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
5.7l/100km
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km, lower is better

Best In Fuel Consumption: Both tires performed equally well

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
5.7l/100km
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
5.7l/100km

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 emitted 16.42% less particle wear matter than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
67mg/km/t
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
56mg/km/t
Weight of Tire Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t), lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
67mg/km/t (+11mg/km/t)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
56mg/km/t

Real World Driver Reviews

Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Driver Reviews

Drivers largely praise the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 for outstanding snow and ice traction, strong wet grip in cold conditions, predictable handling, good comfort/low noise (for a winter tire), and excellent tread life. A minority report softer sidewalls and reduced dry performance or understeer as temperatures rise, with a few notes on noise increase over time and isolated quality/balance issues. Overall sentiment is strongly positive, with most buyers willing to repurchase.

Based on 43 reviews with an average rating of 84%

Hankook Winter i cept evo3 Driver Reviews

Most drivers report that the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 delivers excellent grip and confident handling in wet, dry, and snow, with many praising stability, aquaplaning resistance, and overall comfort/noise at highway speeds. Snow traction is frequently highlighted as a strong point, and several users note good value for money. A minority mention average/longer dry braking, modest sportiness, faster wear in harsh use, and occasional comfort/noise concerns. Overall sentiment is strongly positive given the high share of 80%+ reviews.

Based on 21 reviews with an average rating of 85%

Best Review for the Dunlop Winter Sport 5
Given 81% 225/40 R18 W on a combination of roads for 24,000 spirited miles
I bought these as the successor to Dunlop WinterSport4 which I had been very happy with before, especially with wet grip and good feel in wet/poor conditions. Living and driving around Scotland I use the WinterSport as an all-season tire. The 5's have improved in all areas and especially in dry handling which was a slight letdown with the 4's. Performance now tails off above around 12 degrees ambient, compared to around 7 degrees with the 4's. At high speed in summer the tires can get a little 'floaty', but for me this is an acceptable compromise to the excellent grip in cold wet... Continue reading this review using the link below
Helpful 1153 - tire reviewed on September 24, 2016
View all Dunlop Winter Sport 5 driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Hankook Winter i cept evo3
Given 48% 225/40 R18 V on a combination of roads for 900 spirited miles
Very uncomfortable tire, the sidewall also looks different than on the website, I sold them after a couple of weeks.
Helpful 1220 - tire reviewed on November 1, 2020
View all Hankook Winter i cept evo3 driver reviews >>

Conclusion

If your winter driving is mostly cold, wet, and fast motorway work with frequent heavy rain, the Hankook i*cept evo3 is the safer, sharper choice. It leads convincingly in wet braking and handling across most tests, often pairs that with strong aquaplaning resistance, and in ADAC 2025 shows excellent predicted mileage and low abrasion. It also tends to be priced competitively.

If you routinely face packed snow, icy mornings, and value calm manners and efficiency, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 fits better. It repeatedly shows marginal gains in snow traction/handling and ice braking, runs quieter in several tests, and commonly posts lower rolling resistance, which benefits fuel economy. Where prices are close, Dunlop's efficiency and winter-surface assurance make it compelling; where rain dominates, Hankook's wet stopping advantage is hard to ignore.
Key Differences
  • Wet braking: Hankook leads by meaningful margins in most tests (e.g., up to ~8% shorter in 2020, ~4% in ADAC 2025).
  • Dry braking/handling: Hankook usually edges it; Dunlop occasionally counters but by smaller gaps.
  • Snow and ice: Dunlop often has slightly better traction/handling and ice braking (ADAC 2025 and 2024 Sportscars).
  • Aquaplaning: Hankook frequently stronger in curved aquaplaning; Dunlop posts standout straight-line results in 2024.
  • Efficiency: Dunlop typically shows lower rolling resistance; ADAC 2025 gives Hankook the nod on wear/abrasion.
  • Noise/comfort: Dunlop tends to be quieter; Hankook can be louder externally per several tests.
Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Overall Winner: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:

Footnote

This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.

Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.