Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Uniroyal WinterExpert
In this article we will be looking at independent tire test data, and real world driver reviews of the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 and the Uniroyal WinterExpert to find out which tire is best for your own driving.
There are a few basic differences between the two tires. The Hankook Winter i cept evo3 is an Ultra-High-Performance Winter tire designed to be fitted to Passenger-Cars, and the Uniroyal WinterExpert is an Premium-Touring Winter tire designed to be fitted to Passenger-Cars
Test Results
Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been six tests which compare both tires directly!
| Tire | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Hankook Winter i cept evo3 | five | |
| Uniroyal WinterExpert | one |
While it might look like the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 is better than the Uniroyal WinterExpert purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.
Dry Braking
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during three dry braking tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 stopped the vehicle in 3.66% less distance than the Uniroyal WinterExpert.
Best In Dry Braking: Hankook Winter i cept evo3
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was 0.4% faster around a lap than the Uniroyal WinterExpert.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Winter i cept evo3
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from six tire tests, the Uniroyal WinterExpert was better during four wet braking tests. On average the Uniroyal WinterExpert stopped the vehicle in 1.08% less distance than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.
Best In Wet Braking: Uniroyal WinterExpert
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 stopped the vehicle in 1.57% less distance than the Uniroyal WinterExpert.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Hankook Winter i cept evo3
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during two wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was 1.21% faster around a wet lap than the Uniroyal WinterExpert.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Winter i cept evo3
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 had 10.34% higher lateral wet grip than the Uniroyal WinterExpert.
Best In Wet Circle: Hankook Winter i cept evo3
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during three straight aqua tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 floated at a 2.97% higher speed than the Uniroyal WinterExpert.
Best In Straight Aqua: Hankook Winter i cept evo3
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during two curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 slipped out at a 16.79% higher speed than the Uniroyal WinterExpert.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Hankook Winter i cept evo3
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Snow Braking
Looking at data from six tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during four snow braking tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 stopped the vehicle in 0.82% less distance than the Uniroyal WinterExpert.
Best In Snow Braking: Hankook Winter i cept evo3
See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during three snow traction tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 had 2.73% better snow traction than the Uniroyal WinterExpert.
Best In Snow Traction: Hankook Winter i cept evo3
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was 0.26% faster around a lap than the Uniroyal WinterExpert.
Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Winter i cept evo3
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Slalom
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during two snow slalom tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was 4.85% faster through a slalom than the Uniroyal WinterExpert.
Best In Snow Slalom: Hankook Winter i cept evo3
See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>
Ice Braking
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 and Uniroyal WinterExpert performed equally well in ice braking tests.
Best In Ice Braking: Both tires performed equally well
See how the Ice Braking winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scored 8.22% more points than the Uniroyal WinterExpert.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Hankook Winter i cept evo3
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Uniroyal WinterExpert was better during two noise tests. On average the Uniroyal WinterExpert measured 1.53% quieter than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.
Best In Noise: Uniroyal WinterExpert
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during two wear tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 is predicted to cover 11.05% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Uniroyal WinterExpert.
Best In Wear: Hankook Winter i cept evo3
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Uniroyal WinterExpert was better during one value tests. On average the Uniroyal WinterExpert proved to have a 8.77% better value based on price/1000km than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.
Best In Value: Uniroyal WinterExpert
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Uniroyal WinterExpert was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the Uniroyal WinterExpert had a 7.68% lower rolling resistance than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Uniroyal WinterExpert
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 used 1.72% less fuel than the Uniroyal WinterExpert.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Hankook Winter i cept evo3
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 emitted 18.84% less particle wear matter than the Uniroyal WinterExpert.
Best In Abrasion: Hankook Winter i cept evo3
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Tire Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 and Uniroyal WinterExpert.
In total the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 has been reviewed 22 times and drivers have given the tire 86% overall.
The Uniroyal WinterExpert has been reviewed 6 times and drivers have given the tire 74% overall.
This means in real world driving, people prefer the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.
Conclusion
In conclusion the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 performed better in dry braking, dry handling [km/h], wet braking - concrete, wet handling [km/h], wet circle, straight aqua, curved aquaplaning, snow braking, snow traction, snow handling [km/h], snow slalom, subj. comfort, wear, fuel consumption and abrasion, while the Uniroyal WinterExpert performed better in wet braking, noise, value and rolling resistance.
Interestingly, both tires performed equally well in dry handling, wet handling, snow handling and ice braking, showing that they are closely matched in these areas.
Which tire is best for you depends a lot on your driving style and situation, plus what you want from the tire. Comparing all the data in the tire reviews database, on balance Hankook Winter i cept evo3 seems to be the best tire overall.
However, it's important to note that both tires have their strengths.
Remember, the best tire for you might depend on which of these factors are most important for your specific driving needs and conditions.
Overall Winner: Hankook Winter i cept evo3
Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tire.
Uniroyal WinterExpert Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tire.
Footnote
This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.
Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.