Menu
Viking Protech Newgen View Gallery (1)
175-295/30-70 R15-21 97 sizes 2018

Viking Protech Newgen

The Viking Protech Newgen is a High Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

4.6
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
76%
Wet Grip
75%
Road Feedback
63%
Handling
72%
Wear
85%
Comfort
79%
Buy again
77%
15 Reviews
75% Average
56,620 miles driven
7 Tests (avg: 32nd)
Viking Protech Newgen

Viking Protech Newgen

Summer Economy
BETA
4.6 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Comfort
80.4
0.32x / 2 tests
Wet
73.4
2x / 10 tests
Value
66.6
0.42x / 5 tests
Dry
59.2
1.8x / 6 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
67.4
14 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 7
Publications: 2
Period: 2021 - 2026
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 15
Avg Rating: 75.3%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.14
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2026 Summer Braking Super Tire Test - How do 52 Tires Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? Auto Bild 2026 245/45 R19 36/50 2 metrics
2025 Summer Tire Test Shootout Auto Bild 2025 225/40 R18 33/52 2 metrics
2023 ADAC Summer Tire Test ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 25/50 12 metrics
2023 Summer Tire Market Overview Auto Bild 2023 225/45 R18 37/48 2 metrics
2022 Summer Tire Market Overview Auto Bild 2022 215/55 R17 42/44 2 metrics
2021 ADAC Summer Tire Test - 225/50 R17 ADAC 2021 225/50 R17 16/17 1 metrics
2021 53 Summer Tire Braking Test Auto Bild 2021 205/55 R16 36/53 2 metrics
7
Tests
32nd
Average
16th
Best
42nd
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
Size Fuel Wet Noise
15 inch
185/65 R 15 88 T C B 70
185/65 R 15 88 H C B 70
185/65 R 15 92 T XL C B 71
195/55 R 15 85 V C B 71
195/65 R 15 91 H C B 71
195/65 R 15 91 V C B 71
195/65 R 15 95 T XL C B 72
16 inch
215/70 R 16 100 H D B 71
205/55 R 16 91 V C B 71
205/55 R 16 91 W D B 71
205/55 R 16 94 V XL C B 72
205/60 R 16 92 H C B 71
205/60 R 16 96 W XL C B 72
215/60 R 16 99 V XL C B 72
205/60 R 16 92 V C B 71
215/70R16 100 H C B 71
205/55R16 91 W C B 71
17 inch
215/45 R 17 91 Y XL C B 72
215/55 R 17 98 W XL C B 72
225/45 R 17 91 Y D B 71
225/45 R 17 94 Y XL C B 72
225/50 R 17 98 Y XL C B 72
205/50 R 17 93 Y XL C B 72
225/60 R 17 99 V C B 71
235/65 R 17 108 V XL C B 72
215/55 R 17 94 Y C B 71
225/45R17 91 Y C B 71
18 inch
225/40 R 18 92 Y XL D B 72
235/60 R 18 107 W XL C B 72
245/40 R 18 97 Y XL C B 72
245/45 R 18 100 Y XL C B 72
255/35 R 18 94 Y XL C B 73
19 inch
235/35 R 19 91 Y XL D B 72
20 inch
245/35 R 20 95 Y XL C B 72
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Viking Protech Newgen >>

Questions and Answers for the Viking Protech Newgen

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Viking Protech Newgen. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 14 user reviews

For the Viking Protech Newgen, most drivers report strong wet and dry grip for the price, predictable handling, and good comfort, with some noting low rolling resistance and promising tread life. However, many also mention soft sidewalls leading to vague feedback and a slightly jello-like feel at higher speeds or harder cornering, plus occasional highway noise. Overall sentiment is mixed-to-positive, with high-scoring reviews emphasizing confidence in wet conditions and value, while lower scores criticize handling precision.

Strengths
  • Wet grip/confidence
  • Dry grip/braking
  • Value for money
  • Comfort/ride quality
  • Predictable handling
  • Fuel economy/low rolling resistance
  • Tread life/longevity
Areas for Improvement
  • Soft sidewalls/lack of steering feedback
  • Handling feel at high speed/cornering
  • Road noise at highway speeds

Top 3 Viking Protech Newgen Reviews

Given 36% while driving a Audi A3 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 1,000 average miles
You crank the wheel, nothing happens, count “one-Mississippi”… then the nose finally wanders toward the apex. It feels like the sidewalls are made of chewing gum.Any half-decent bend at 70 km/h and the body just lolls over like you’re riding waves. Add a mid-corner bump and the whole car pogo-sticks. Zero confidence.Yeah, they’re legal and they roll fine in a straight line, but the moment the road bends or the sky leaks you’re captaining a barge, not driving a car. Save yourself the stress
June 23, 2025
Given 67% while driving a Peugeot 308 sw 1.6 hdi (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 600 spirited miles
I' ve got 2 of these on front switching from sebring , massive difference in road noise, those sebring were awful but they were an older model made in 2017, the overall grip is better dry and wet, braking is better, but I think the sidewalls are softer because on road feedback I have no idea what my front wheels are doing, greater speed in corners but less feedback, wear I have no idea because I only have 1000 km on them
P.S. I selected spirited because I'm doing granny driving and overspirited driving, town, highway and mountain roads...
May 31, 2024
Given 83% while driving a Skoda Superb MK3 (2015 Present) (235/45 R18) on mostly motorways for 2,000 easy going miles
First kilometers from new. Did around 3000 km on these tires on summer trip. Like a tire of this class they were quite good. The only drawback of them were during hot summer days doing high speed travelling on highways. While going 140 km/h and above they sometimes felt a little to soft and car handling started to feel like riding on a jello sometimes. But, nothing dangerous. All in all tires are quite good.
December 3, 2024

How would you rate the Viking Protech Newgen?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Viking Protech Newgen Reviews

Given 87% while driving a BMW 520d (225/50 R17) on a combination of roads for 9,000 average miles
Coming out from some great Michelin Primacy RUNFLAT tires I opted for these Viking ProTech NewGen, as one of my friends with a Mercedes E Klasse recommended them to me as reliable for normal use. I can say I like switching from RUNFLAT to normal tires as they are not so loud and are softer on normal city roads with the car suspension. After cca. 9000 miles or 13000+ km I can say the tires are reliable and a great choice for the money (I paid ≈ 75 EUR/tire). They feel great, braking is good in dry and wet, handling just find in rain. The only thing I can say they are a bit loud on the highway driving at 130 km/hr or 80 miles/hr. Took them on long roads for summer vacation, 2500 km round trip and no complaints here. Would definitely consider them again.
November 8, 2023
Given 56% while driving a BMW 330D Touring (245/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 25,000 spirited miles
I replaced the previous set of Michelin Primacy 3 runflats with these Protech Newgens from Continental's budget brand; formerly Norwegian made but my tires were made in Portugal. The price offered from Delticom for this recently updated tire design was so low that it even undercut some of the chinese brands- I had to try them. I think these tires are identical to the Gislaved Ultraspeed 2, at least the tire pattern is the same, also Conti-owned. As for my experience with the Vikings driving wise, they have been absolutely adequate -but one can tell they are not a premium offer -quite noisy for an standard non runflat tire and the grip is fine to a certain degree, then it vanishes rather quickly. But the fantastic upside is treadlife: driving a RWD BMW 330d Touring with 258hp and 560 Nm one is used to the car wearing out (especially rear) tires quickly, but these have lasted for 3.5 years so far, with plenty of tread depth left - and that is AMAZING.
September 20, 2023
Given 86% while driving a Audi A6 (245/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 3,000 spirited miles
Have driven around 4,000 km with these tires, excellent dry and wet grip. Very good handling and solid braking but let's remember they aren't premium. Overall I am very satisfied with this Tire, my comment is that when cornering harder they do feel a bit flimsy, but are very predictable. When going over bumps or specially dents you can feel these are overall very soft. Mine are XL. Not a heavy solid tire, rather more a well made light tire. Visually they browned a bit faster than I would like but I am still very satisfied! Mine came from the newest factory in Portugal just a few months after opening it!
September 4, 2022
Given 80% while driving a Renault Clio Mk2 Fase 2, 1.5 dci, 65 hp (185/55 R15) on mostly motorways for 5,000 spirited miles
Bought a set of these tires for my car. The fast fitter suggested these tires as he only had these in stock at that moment. Initialy I was hessistent to take them because I wanted an A brand. Yet I took them. On dry roads the tires behave very well. Good grip even when pushed to the limit. Wet grip and behaviour is also very good. I feel confident when driving on very wet roads. Noise is OK but could be better. Not that comfortable. The tires don't really absorb bumps on the road that well. But this being said: good tire for a budget price. It's part of the Continental Group and made in Slovakia. No China crap. Cannot comment on wear yet after 5k kilometers. They do not seem to have lost a few mm however.
April 11, 2022
Given 78% while driving a SEAT Altea (205/55 R16) on mostly country roads for 500 spirited miles
Fitted these in late August 21 so still new & limited mileage but so far very pleased as replaced Goodyear efficient grip 2 tires that cracked badly after only 2 yrs use. Though had fair bit of tread left. So far finding these good all round tires. Sporty handling & good grip for most roads, in our Seat Altea mpv, which is 1.9 TDI type. Defo good on economy too as no drop in mpg from Goodyear's. Time will tell on mileage. Would recommend these for good all round sport/touring tire.
September 13, 2021
(225/45 R17) on for 0 miles
Hi Astra man back again, I had to let my Astra go this month as I had a lot of engine trouble that couldn't be cured so she had to go, but I am really gutted I couldn't take the tires off and transplant them on to my newer Astra because its got bigger alloys so they had to go with the car. All I can say is about the Newgens is they were brilliant top marks for the time I had them.. for wet and dry work they never missed a beat on bends and wet motorways and wide fast roundabouts not once did they every let the car down, they would have gone very well on mileage but I cant say to what now, at the time they had a lot of tread left front and rear and they kept their pressures well. We still have them on the rear of my miss'es astra hatchback and exactly the same they are handling very well, I didn't put them on the fronts because I didn't want order again from Germany online as that's the only place I could find them and its a pain so Primacy 4's went on they're easier to get hold of. Newgens are not cheap tires they cost the same as the Michelins on the 205/55r16 size. My review of these tires is solely on my astra what they will be like on a different car I don't know. I will continue to put my opinion on my new tires on my new car here, I took off the ones that came with the car and got Kumho HS51 on 215/50r17 so far they are very good,,but then they are very new. ATB
August 19, 2021
Given 78% while driving a (245/45 R19 W) on mostly country roads for 120 spirited miles
Surprisingly good wet performance. Dry grip is good but lacking abit feedback. Also sidewalls appear to be on the soft side, comfort rather than feedback. Tires on Tesla Model S - heavy car. Only driven 200km approx., so initial feedback.
May 5, 2020
(225/45 R17) on for 0 miles
Well hello.. looks like nearly only me has bought these tires not many reviews on these again. Any way its has been a good journey on these tires, they have gone through the cold weather very well, in the rain they have been very safe my Astra estate, unladen my Astra is very light in the rear and when pressed onwards has stayed well planted on the road in all weathers. I would like to find fault with the tires but so far that has been impossible..on my car. The wear still is good at both ends they are 94 load rating and 420 treadwear, if that has helped well great. After using these I am now happy to fit them to my miss'es Astra hatchback she needs 4, it is a shame I have to get them online though as they are difficult to buy locally. ATB
March 1, 2020
(225/45 R17) on for 0 miles
Hi Astra Estate man here again just to do a quick update. Over the last 2 weeks we have had some heavy rain and happily I have had to drive in it. These Newgens have performed very good in the rain and I mean the heavy stuff they have cleared the water very well and I feel perfectly safe driving on them,

One day I pushed them on an empty wide road well above the conditions just to see if they would aquaplane but they stayed well footed, a bit risky I know but I have straight line aquaplaned in the past and knew what to expect and how to get out of it...but also the tires are still at full tread depth.
As it stands I am still well pleased with my purchase for my car, the wear rate is still too early to rate.
ATB
October 18, 2019
Given 90% while driving a (205/55 R16 V) on for 0 miles
Hello, I fitted 4 of these to my Astra estate in 205/55r16 94v. My previous front tires were Firestone Roadhawk and were the worst tires I have on the front my review on those is available to read... they were awful. My rears were Marshall KH35 and were brilliant but I cant get them anymore so i opted for the Viking Newgen's to try out.

I have to say these tires have been great to drive on in the last 900 plus miles, they feel like they are actually made out of rubber compared driving on the Firestones, they do not squeal on corners or bends they hold the car true and the are extremely comfortable. In the wet they are very good on the road and the dry grip is spot on, my driving style is press on and I do push the car a bit.

I went for the extra load for a change and I run the pressures 3 psi above base around town.

I cant comment on the wear yet but I will when the time comes for that, new the tires are 8.3mm deep. Last week we came back from a long week end down in Cornwall and did just over 670 miles the tires preformed very well on all types of roads and high speeds on the motorway dry and wet.

Now then the Viking website does need updating and needs to show more information, finding reviews was quite hard so I had to search more into European drivers to get what I needed before I chose them.

All I can say so far on my Astra they are very good and I am well pleased with my purchase, this might change as the miles build up but I will report that as well.
ATB
September 11, 2019
Given 80% while driving a Subaru XV Crosstrek (225/55 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 400 average miles
I was buy the tires 1 month ago. Good grip in dry and wet conditions, smooth and comfortable ride, low rolling resistance, fuel economy, good dry and wet braking, weak handling.
April 17, 2019
Rate the Viking Protech Newgen