Menu

Star Performer TNG UHP1

The Star Performer TNG UHP1 is a High Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

3.0
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
70%
Wet Grip
66%
Road Feedback
70%
Handling
58%
Wear
66%
Comfort
56%
Buy again
58%
5 Reviews
63% Average
29,500 miles driven
3 Tests (avg: 41st)
Star-Performer TNG UHP1

Star-Performer TNG UHP1

Summer Budget
BETA
3 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Dry
41.2
1.8x / 1 test
Wet
40
2x / 1 test

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
40.6
2 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 3
Publications: 1
Period: 2014 - 2019
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 5
Avg Rating: 63.4%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.65
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2019 Summer 53 Tire Braking Shootout Auto Bild 2019 225/45 R17 53/45 2 metrics
2017 Auto Bild Summer Tire Shootout Auto Bild 2017 225/50 R17 37/43 0 metrics
2014 Auto Bild 50 Summer Tire Shootout Auto Bild 2014 225/50 R17 32/50 0 metrics
3
Tests
41st
Average
32nd
Best
53rd
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
53rd/45
37th/43
32nd/50

Questions and Answers for the Star Performer TNG UHP1

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Star Performer TNG UHP1. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Star Performer TNG UHP1 Reviews

Given 35% while driving a Mercedes Benz Vito (255/45 R18) on mostly country roads for 8,000 average miles
Cheap tire. They are dangerous with speed over 120km/h. The car dance by itself and hard to control even if it is a straight line. If you want to chat inside the car, forget it as the noise is to loud.
The wear on the side is crap.
Worst tire I ever have owned.
Now I have changed to GoodYear Eagle F1 AS3, and what a differnce.

PS! If you don't like a big challenge, never buy these tires
June 16, 2016
Given 83% while driving a BMW 330 Ci Sport (245/35 R19) on mostly town for 4,000 spirited miles
Put to test 235/35 and 245/35 R19 Star Performer tires. Indeed, very similar to Nankang NS-2.
Very great looking V shark tread, rim edge with protection lip, nice smooth. Stretches well.

Dry grip excellent, can't complain. Wet grip is pretty ok, could be little better... but for this price it's great.




July 11, 2017
Given 73% while driving a Opel Zafira 1.6 comfort (225/45 R17 H) on mostly country roads for 500 spirited miles
NOTE: available in H and V speed ratings on same tire sizes.
I'm a tight-wad, and spent ages trawling through brand new cheapy tires on eBay trying to sift through all the junk and find a reasonable set to go on a family wagon (Vaux Zafira A) and these came up at a fantastic price of just £42 a tire delivered to my door.
First impressions, they look very similar to the Nankang NS2's and have a good sturdy tire wall that sits up and over slightly the rim edge giving rim protection.
They are not as noisy as I thought with them being directional and was expecting tire hum on smooth road surfaces (the kind of noise like a wheel bearing) but was pleasantly surprised.
I do a lot of miles, city and motorway driving is smooth and sweet, dry grip is good, wet grip is good (haven't slid them sideways while accelerating at full lock like I could I usual cack tires)
These are a great choice for those who want cheap tires for domestic vehicles. I'm really pleased as they have all thr pro's of the Nankang NS2's without the cons.
A good upcoming tire brand.
March 13, 2014

How would you rate the Star Performer TNG UHP1?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Star Performer TNG UHP1 Reviews

Given 50% while driving a Honda CRX Del Sol (215/40 R17 V) on mostly town for 10,000 average miles
It is cheap, but therefore dangerous, from 88kmh with my honda del sol, I can stop in 50-52 meter(measured, dry), but with a better(not premium) tire the distande is only 36 meter(measured)
Buy some good tires, not this one!!!!
June 2, 2015
Given 77% while driving a Peugeot 406 Coupe SE (3.0 ltr V6) (215/50 R17 W) on mostly country roads for 7,000 average miles
great tire, good grip on wet and dry. Rapid wear on the sides, the front tires have 10000km, tires rear them are OK.
June 4, 2014
Rate the Star Performer TNG UHP1