Menu
Landsail LS588 UHP View Gallery (1)
205-315/25-60 R16-22 79 sizes 2021

Landsail LS588 UHP

The Landsail LS588 UHP is a High Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

4.5
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
Medium Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
80%
Wet Grip
73%
Road Feedback
69%
Handling
67%
Wear
76%
Comfort
79%
Buy again
67%
101 Reviews
73% Average
996,390 miles driven
2 Tests (avg: 8th)
Landsail LS588 UHP

Landsail LS588 UHP

Summer Economy
BETA
4.5 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · Medium Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Value
100
0.42x / 2 tests
Comfort
100
0.32x / 1 test
Dry
47.5
1.8x / 2 tests
Wet
40
2x / 3 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Handling
44.6
2 tests
Braking
42.5
2 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 2
Publications: 2
Period: 2015 - 2021
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 101
Avg Rating: 73%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 1.56
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tire Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2021 265/35 R20 8/9 8 metrics
2015 Test World Summer Tire Test Test World 2015 205/55 R16 8/15 0 metrics
2
Tests
8th
Average
8th
Best
8th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
8th/9
Very low rolling resistance.
Limited wet grip, very long wet and dry braking distances, bad handling and poor aquaplaning resistance.
Not Recommended.
8th/15
Short braking distance in the wet and dry
Handling not good enough in the dry. Very weak aquaplaning resistance.
The Landsail LS588 UHP were surprisingly unbalanced. Braking in the wet was excellent, but handling very unstable. In addition, the tire copes worse than the others with emergency manoeuvres and is quite susceptible to aquaplaning. On dry pavement they again quickly stopped the car, but had very slow response to steering. Lateral grip and stability are too weak for the optimal performance of a sharp manoeuvre at high speed. Because of their softness they demonstrated a high level of comfort, effectively absorbing road irregularities.
Size Fuel Wet Noise
16 inch
205/55R16 91 V B B 70
215/60R16 95 V B B 71
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Landsail LS588 UHP >>

Questions and Answers for the Landsail LS588 UHP

Ask a question
October 9, 2017

What pressure should I run these on , currently driving a Ssangyong Acton Ute

The tire pressure for the Landsail LS588 UHP is vehicle and load specific. The correct tire pressure for your vehicle can usually be found on a sticker in the door shut of the driver's door, or in the manufacturer's handbook.
January 15, 2018

Do these tires offer rim protection?

Looking at the pictures of the Landsail LS588 UHP, it does not look like they offer rim / curb protection.
June 7, 2019

Do these tires offer rim protection?

I'm unsure, sorry
June 3, 2020

Is this tire sutable for Honda vezal 2018 RS Model

Providing you can find the right size and load index, yes it is.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Size Price Range  
205/40 R17 $85.96 - $86.97 (2 Prices) Compare Prices >>
215/45 R16 $74.97 - $74.97 (1 Price) Compare Prices >>
225/45 R17 $92.98 - $97.96 (2 Prices) Compare Prices >>
225/50 R17 $117.96 - $117.96 (1 Price) Compare Prices >>
235/35 R19 $135.96 - $135.96 (1 Price) Compare Prices >>
235/40 R18 $106.97 - $106.97 (1 Price) Compare Prices >>
Available in 106 tire sizes - View all.

Review Summary

Based on 93 user reviews

Most drivers find the Landsail LS588 UHP to be very good value, with quiet, comfortable road manners, acceptable to strong dry grip, and often surprisingly good wear and motorway stability for everyday driving. However, a substantial minority report weak wet grip, soft/vague handling at higher speeds, and premature/uneven wear; there are also multiple reports of structural issues (bulges/delamination) undermining confidence. Overall sentiment is mixed-to-positive, with budget buyers and moderate driving styles most satisfied, while performance-oriented users are more critical.

Strengths
  • Good value/price
  • Low noise/comfort
  • Decent dry grip and braking
  • Longevity/mileage for the price
  • Stable motorway cruising
Areas for Improvement
  • Poor wet grip/aquaplaning risk
  • Soft sidewalls/vague handling
  • Premature or uneven wear
  • Structural issues (bulges/delamination)
  • High-speed instability/vibration

Top 3 Landsail LS588 UHP Reviews

Given 81% while driving a BMW 320D Coupe (255/35 R18) on mostly motorways for 1,000 average miles
Have had Landsail on a Porsche Boxster s and my previous BMW 325d ,
Had no issues at all. Good value all round tire with good mileage , 25K on rear of BMW. I mostly drive motorway and local A roads. I’m no boy racer , but have found them fine for normal driving. Good price for a sensible guy like me .
June 3, 2025
Given 65% while driving a BMW Z4 (235/35 R18) on a combination of roads for 24 average miles
The inside contact point with the wheel rim failed leading to complete loss of pressure.
This looks like a material failure.
Tires were fitted 23 months ago and 24,000 miles. We’re wearing well and the car handled well albeit well inside its suspension capacity.
Just about replace the dead and remaining three tires for a better brand.
August 15, 2025
Given 78% while driving a Renault Kadjar 1.5DCi (225/45 R19) on a combination of roads for 20,000 easy going miles
I've used these on a few of my taxis and for the price can't complain, currently I've 2.5 mil left after 20000 miles.
March 2, 2025

How would you rate the Landsail LS588 UHP?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Landsail LS588 UHP Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 57% while driving a BMW 330i M SPORT SALOON (255/35 R18) on for 25,000 miles
Been running three sets of these tires in 17" and 18" over the years. What I have found after aprox 50000 km is:

Wet grip is excellent when the tires are new, but starts degrading quickly after 10000 km or so. Wet grip becomes very unpredictable after that, and sometimes it's down right scary with oversteer situations out of the blue.

Dry grip is OK. However they are mushy when new due to the soft compound, resulting in a vague feel. Once they wear down to about 60-70% they feel like different tires.

Two of three sets have developed structural issues with the belts separating after wearing down to 40-50%. I would NOT buy these again and I don't advice anyone to buy them. It's a big safety concern. Value isn't great either when they fail before you can wear them down.
February 3, 2026
Given 93% while driving a Citroën C5 (215/55 R17) on a combination of roads for 45,000 average miles
I had the opportunity to drive a C5 2l 16v, 150 hp, fitted with Michelin Primacy 3, then Pirelli P7 Blu, then Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance – top-notch grip, but one set of tires in 12 months. I ended up with Landsail 588 UHP, a little less grip than Goodyear, but flawless handling in dry or wet conditions, very even and uniform tire wear. For this, the alignment and tire pressures must always be correct. For a price 2.5 times lower than Michelin, I tested 4 Pirelli P7 Blu, rated A/A/A, grip worse than Landsail. Reaching 70% wear in 18 months, the Pirellis were completely deformed, giving me vibrations in the steering wheel at 120 km/h (atrocious). For me, Goodyear Top Adhesion 12 months costs €160, the best value for money. €80 for 24 months for one tire with very good performance. The calculation is simple and logical. And I would add that to comply with the highway code, you don't need tires capable of 300 km/h. Tire labeling is done by NF and Euro approved centers, not by the tire manufacturers. There are some major Chinese tire manufacturers that are worth or even surpass Michelin, for example: Landsail Sentury, Triangle, Delinte. A word to the wise.
December 6, 2025
Given 70% while driving a MG mg4 (235/35 R20) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
On dry roads, the tire rides comfortably. Smooth, with sufficient feedback, and comfort. However, in the wet, it reaches its limits. Therefore, I recommend the UHP 588 primarily for people who primarily ride in dry conditions.
October 17, 2025
Given 83% while driving a Skoda Rapid TSI (215/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 21,000 spirited miles
Purchased these mainly because of the price. I needed 2 new tires and these were priced well. I had used Landsail LS388 on a previous car and they were pretty good. The 588 however weren't as good for pulling away, they gave a fair amount of slip under acceleration. Having now driven 21000 miles on them and needing to replace. I won't be buying them again mainly because of that slippage as I didn't have confidence in pulling away and partly because I'm now is a position to afford Premium Tires and have opted for Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2's. Other than that they handled everything I threw at them. Summer, winter, wet, dry, ice, snow with the appropriate driving they were fine. They have lasted 2 and a half years (21000 Miles) not a bad tire by any means and if budget is a concern then you can't really go wrong.
December 21, 2024
Given 40% while driving a Citroën c3 Picasso 1.6 diesel (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 1,000 average miles
These were on a Citroen C3 Picasso (205/45/17W) I bought and they were new tires. They are awful, they skip on tight corners in the dry, they easily aquaplane in the wet. I'm not going to risk my life in the winter so they'r coming off and Pirellis going on.
November 14, 2024
Given 97% while driving a Mercedes Benz 250 CGi estate (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 1,100 average miles
I was in initially doubtful about these tires but after 6 months of use i am delighted with all aspects of performance.I had Michelin primacy fitted previously and these tires out perform them in almost all areas.
My driving is mostly on Motorways or A roads in UK so I wont be hammering around any race circuits any time soon so these tires are more than adequate for this type of driving, its down to the individual to choose their preference but for £600 a set you wont go wrong in my opinion.
August 3, 2024
Given 36% while driving a Volvo V60 D6 AWD (235/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 500 spirited miles
Great if you don't value your car, Good emergency tire. Terrible tire in general.
Bought after chunking a pothole as an emergency tire. Other tire was thin so bought as an axle.
Road handling is awful. You feel disconnected, I honestly thought my vehicle was faulty. Dry braking was increased by 10 meters from 60mph, ABS was panicking as the tires were trying to skid.
Wet is outright dangerous, these DO NOT GRIP. I used these tires for about 500 miles before buying a mid range tire.
Average cornering on these showed a lot of scrub.
Best thing about these, is they smoke well when burning out. I did not want to subject another road user to these as part worn.
July 25, 2024
Given 25% while driving a BMW 740d msport (275/35 R20) on mostly motorways for 1,000 average miles
There is a reason people call these ‘ditch finders’. They are unstable.
They came on a 740d I purchased because the previous owner had Champaign taste but lemonade pockets. They’ve immediately been swapped out for Goodyear Eagle F1 AS2
June 30, 2024
Given 56% while driving a SEAT Leon Cupra ST 290 (FWD) (235/35 R19) on a combination of roads for 10,500 average miles
Well I've had these tire for around 14 months and covered almost 11,000 replacing them now for 2 reasons had a puncture in one and then inspecting all of them one of them it starting to break up on the inside shoulder looks like its delaminating so for peace of mind 2 needed to be done but done all four.

Before i go into it i had these tires fitted with the car brand new and had come from eagle f1's on my previous car. reading the reviews you have to treat them with respect in wet with braking distance in the 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tire Test the wet braking is over double the distance for braking so treat them like your standing behind a donkey.

Straight line traction - is quiet comical alot of power to a fwd car 2nd gear no chance 3rd gear even on a warm day it will still be spinning its quiet funny spin them up a few times and get some heat into them then start to hookup, in the wet forget it the tires can't cope even easing into it power is still cut.

I rotated them at 7000 miles Im sure they started out with around 7.5mm and had 4mm on the fronts rears had between 5.5-6mm so hoped for decent longevity.

Cornering dry conditions they are ok and can feel where the limit of the tire is nothing special but they didn't do anything you wouldn't expect

are they a bad tire no are they a good tire im going to say not bad but get what you pay for in the dry they are ok and had to do a couple of emergency stops in the dry and they was fairly decent with a boot full of kit.

They have a treadwear rating of 500 which sounds good but i was far from probably getting the theoretical milage I've gone to eagle f1 AS6, I got a good deal 4 fitted for £518 if i was to replace the landsails fitted it was £362.

If your in abit of a pinch and need tires and can't stretch to a midrange tire and willing to treat it with respect in the wet then its not bad i think there is probably worse tires out there but there could be better for similar money.
April 1, 2024
Given 86% while driving a Ford Focus ST250 (235/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 6,000 spirited miles
Honest review, I don't get the negativity from some. Snobbery?
I've used these now with no issues all year round for last couple of years.
I think because they are cheap they give off a negative impression, would I use them on track? No. But for every day spirited driving they are perfect.
Having been a user of PS4 and Eagle f1 which are great tires I needed a cheaper alternative so I could easily afford to get some new rubber whenever needed, without breaking the bank. The tire wall looks nice when dressed up, are quiet and grippy enough whatever the weather. The wear rate is similar to the PS4 but now you can afford to get new whenever you want at around 60 quid a tire in my size.
May 5, 2023
Given 47% while driving a Rover 25 (185/45 R14) on mostly town for 2,000 spirited miles
Worst wet weather grip I have ever known. The car spins its wheels on pull away and even when moving in the lower gears ( I do not drive a fast car!) on roundabouts it understeers and just go straight if there is any moisture at all on the road. My stopping distances are huge . I really think these tires are actually dangerous and I am planning to get rid of them asap money allowing. I run an old cheap car for commuting so I bought a budget tire-big mistake.
November 21, 2022
Given 69% while driving a Honda Civic Type R (245/30 R20) on a combination of roads for 1,000 spirited miles
The shop put around 41psi at the rear, so my first drive can be considered really scary. They felt unstable at the beginning the high psi did triggered the TPMS. Had to stop and deflate them to 33psi. At 300km breaking in, I still don't feel safe when entering corners so I pump another 2psi to give it stiffer feeling for the sidewall. I can now put a bit more throttle at the corners without the scary sliding/unstable feeling. Now at 1000km, a little improvement during cornering, however straight line pull is not stable. The rear is unstable and the car feels like floating at high speed. At 170kmh, you can feel like the tires are too soft and flexing too much even with straight line pull. Still manageable but not really as good as the Conti. I'm not expecting the LS588 to perform like OEM Conti Sport Contact 6, but they are night and day difference. However, at normal driving speed they can be quite comfortable. Low noise. Just that they are not really reliable/safe for spirited driving.
June 29, 2022
Rate the Landsail LS588 UHP