Continental PremiumContact 7 Reviews - Page 2
Given 59%
while driving a
Volkswagen 2019 Golf Variant 1.5 TSI
(205/55 R16)
on mostly motorways
for 18,000 easy going miles
Performance dips noticeably at around the 5mm mark. The confidence I had in the tires previously were gradually eroded.
Given 77%
while driving a
Hyundai Avante
(225/45 R17)
on mostly town
for 2,000 average miles
A very competent tire that give the assurance on wet and dry situations. The only complaint I have for this tire is that it seem to be a small stones and pebbles magnet. It tend to trap small stone and pebbles from the road and dislodge it after some distance.
Given 100%
while driving a
Toyota CHR Hybrid
(225/50 R18)
on mostly town
for 0 average miles
The best on this size tires.
Given 90%
while driving a
Opel Insignia B
(225/45 R17)
on mostly motorways
for 12,000 average miles
Lovely tire to drive, very safe and predictable. Things that could be better I could only mention comfort. With better comfort, this would be a perfect summer tire. If you do a lot of motorway driving like myself, you would probably be better with Premacy 5 overall. For more sporty drivers, do not look futher...
Given 77%
while driving a
Volkswagen Golf Mk6 1.4 TSI 160
(205/55 R16)
on a combination of roads
for 15,000 spirited miles
Tire Experience Comparison: Nokian eLine 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7
I wanted to share this review with you because the Nokian eLine 2 was not a very well-known tire model in the Turkish market; however, it offered an unforgettable driving experience for me. I actively used this tire between 2020 and 2024 and switched to the Continental PremiumContact 7 model as of the summer of 2024. When I evaluate it comparatively, my longing for the eLine 2 has deepened over time.
1. Fuel Consumption
With the PremiumContact 7, I observed an increase in average fuel consumption of approximately 1 liter on the same driving style and routes. This difference significantly increases the cost, especially on long distance drives.
2. Indoor Noise
One of the most negative aspects of the PremiumContact 7 is the high road noise. The noise level in the interior on bad asphalt has never been this disturbing in any summer or winter tire I have used in the past. In fact, it makes more noise than winter tires such as Michelin Alpin 4 and Alpin 6. While this situation is at a level that can cause headaches, even passengers are suggesting technical intervention by attributing the problem to the hub bearings. However, all checks reported that the hubs were intact.
3. Driving Dynamics and Performance
The difference becomes especially evident at higher speeds:
-With the Nokian eLine 2, my vehicle could barely go up to 235 km/h on a steep road.
-It is not even possible to maintain a constant speed above 220 km/h with the PremiumContact 7.
Also, in terms of driving characteristics, Nokian gives the vehicle a more agile, fast and responsive structure; with PremiumContact 7, the vehicle becomes cumbersome and slow to respond. By the way, my vehicle's maintenance is complete and its condition is very good.
4. Wet Ground Performance
Although both tires have safety-oriented designs in wet conditions, the Nokian eLine 2's wet grip performance was noticeably superior.
In sudden rain, puddles and slippery corners, Nokian provides the user with a much greater sense of confidence and stability.
The PremiumContact 7 is not bad in this area, but it feels like the Nokian is one step ahead in terms of hydroplaning resistance and braking distance.
5. Nokian eLine 2 – Pros and Cons
Negatives:
Due to its soft dough, its lifespan may be limited to 3 summer seasons.
In the 3rd season, small parts breaking off and a tendency to get damaged easily on rocky roads are observed.
Positive Aspects:
It is well above its class in terms of silence, road holding, agility and driving comfort.
The feeling of confidence it provides on wet surfaces and during sudden manoeuvres makes it ideal for city driving and long distance driving.
6. Conclusion and Choice
If it were available on the market, my choice would still be the Nokian eLine 2. Although the Continental PremiumContact 7 has strong features on paper, it did not meet my expectations in terms of real user experience. Since driving comfort, interior quietness and agility are especially important for me, the Nokian was more successful in these criteria.
I wanted to share this review with you because the Nokian eLine 2 was not a very well-known tire model in the Turkish market; however, it offered an unforgettable driving experience for me. I actively used this tire between 2020 and 2024 and switched to the Continental PremiumContact 7 model as of the summer of 2024. When I evaluate it comparatively, my longing for the eLine 2 has deepened over time.
1. Fuel Consumption
With the PremiumContact 7, I observed an increase in average fuel consumption of approximately 1 liter on the same driving style and routes. This difference significantly increases the cost, especially on long distance drives.
2. Indoor Noise
One of the most negative aspects of the PremiumContact 7 is the high road noise. The noise level in the interior on bad asphalt has never been this disturbing in any summer or winter tire I have used in the past. In fact, it makes more noise than winter tires such as Michelin Alpin 4 and Alpin 6. While this situation is at a level that can cause headaches, even passengers are suggesting technical intervention by attributing the problem to the hub bearings. However, all checks reported that the hubs were intact.
3. Driving Dynamics and Performance
The difference becomes especially evident at higher speeds:
-With the Nokian eLine 2, my vehicle could barely go up to 235 km/h on a steep road.
-It is not even possible to maintain a constant speed above 220 km/h with the PremiumContact 7.
Also, in terms of driving characteristics, Nokian gives the vehicle a more agile, fast and responsive structure; with PremiumContact 7, the vehicle becomes cumbersome and slow to respond. By the way, my vehicle's maintenance is complete and its condition is very good.
4. Wet Ground Performance
Although both tires have safety-oriented designs in wet conditions, the Nokian eLine 2's wet grip performance was noticeably superior.
In sudden rain, puddles and slippery corners, Nokian provides the user with a much greater sense of confidence and stability.
The PremiumContact 7 is not bad in this area, but it feels like the Nokian is one step ahead in terms of hydroplaning resistance and braking distance.
5. Nokian eLine 2 – Pros and Cons
Negatives:
Due to its soft dough, its lifespan may be limited to 3 summer seasons.
In the 3rd season, small parts breaking off and a tendency to get damaged easily on rocky roads are observed.
Positive Aspects:
It is well above its class in terms of silence, road holding, agility and driving comfort.
The feeling of confidence it provides on wet surfaces and during sudden manoeuvres makes it ideal for city driving and long distance driving.
6. Conclusion and Choice
If it were available on the market, my choice would still be the Nokian eLine 2. Although the Continental PremiumContact 7 has strong features on paper, it did not meet my expectations in terms of real user experience. Since driving comfort, interior quietness and agility are especially important for me, the Nokian was more successful in these criteria.
Given 82%
while driving a
BMW 330d
(255/40 R18)
on mostly motorways
for 24,000 average miles
Got these tires for my g21 330d 18inch size 225 front 255 rear, previous tires were bridgestone turanza 6 all 4 225 and PC7 is definately louder, nothing excessive its just that turanza 6 was really quiet, every other thing performance dry/wet/ braking dry/wet has also improved, especially in the wet.
Not much to say other than im very pleased, but considering these are one of the most expensive tires you can buy, its to be expected.
Cant say much about wear so far they look like new, i've had PC6 in the past on my leon FR and they were bald in 10k miles. UPDATE: Nearly a year later and roughly 24,000kms done on these tires, the rears are down to about 4mm , wet grip has really decreased significantly and the tires are even noisier then they were already when new, i am a bit dissapointed with noise primarily considering its a quiet car and how silent the previous t006 were, gotta say for the price i paid ( 800 euro all 4) i would not buy them again, i predict the rears will need replacing at around 30,000km mark, the fronts are still holding up ok at around 6mm thread depth.
Not much to say other than im very pleased, but considering these are one of the most expensive tires you can buy, its to be expected.
Cant say much about wear so far they look like new, i've had PC6 in the past on my leon FR and they were bald in 10k miles. UPDATE: Nearly a year later and roughly 24,000kms done on these tires, the rears are down to about 4mm , wet grip has really decreased significantly and the tires are even noisier then they were already when new, i am a bit dissapointed with noise primarily considering its a quiet car and how silent the previous t006 were, gotta say for the price i paid ( 800 euro all 4) i would not buy them again, i predict the rears will need replacing at around 30,000km mark, the fronts are still holding up ok at around 6mm thread depth.
Given 100%
while driving a
Volkswagen Golf Mk7.5 Alltrack 2.0TDI
(205/55 R17)
on mostly town
for 500 easy going miles
So i just bought these tires replacing a pair of Michelin Primacy 4s. The difference is (and i kid you not) night and day.
The road feedback is amazing.
The comfort is amazing -> these take bumps soooo much better than those Michelins.
No problems in rain whatsoever. Grips for ages...well rounded tire.
Ah and btw on my old Golf 7 I had a brand new pait of Premium Contact 6s and i dont think those held a candle to these new PC7s.
Must buy. in my humble oppinion.
The road feedback is amazing.
The comfort is amazing -> these take bumps soooo much better than those Michelins.
No problems in rain whatsoever. Grips for ages...well rounded tire.
Ah and btw on my old Golf 7 I had a brand new pait of Premium Contact 6s and i dont think those held a candle to these new PC7s.
Must buy. in my humble oppinion.
Given 94%
while driving a
Hyundai Kona electric
(235/45 R18)
on a combination of roads
for 5,000 spirited miles
With the 395Nm FWD EV, this tire can put down most of the torque, lowering the tire spin speed from 50 to about 35km/h compared to Michelin Pilot Sport 4. While it doesn't give the best road feedback it is a daily commuter tire that has buckets of grip in any condition.
Given 84%
while driving a
Volkswagen Scirocco 2.0 TSI 210hp
(235/40 R18)
on mostly country roads
for 1,000 spirited miles
1000+ Miles. Previous tires from the previous owners were Maxxis-somethings with I'd say about 30% of their lifetime left.
Dry grip, warm and cold, has been excellent. In colder weather and at colder temperatures I have been able to get the rear to step out briefly (on a FWD!) before ESC kicks in, at a sharp angle; vs severe understeer on the maxxis, but I attribute that to the wear.
Otherwise, in a straight line, across motorway driving, Peak District roads, and city driving, brilliant grip so far.
Not had a great amount of driving in the wet to rate, but from what I have done, seems as good as any other tire I've tried.
Road Feedback: Not an expert but I'd say you get a lot of feedback out of them.
Handling feels very good, very grippy, able to be pushed a bit.
Wear, initial 1000 miles so not really comparable, but I've had a few times I've said "hmm, have I got tread left?" while looking from afar - but that's just visual I think.
Comfort.... More "clunky" when over potholes or bad road surface, but otherwise very smooth on motorways. Not jarring but certainly not luxurious.
Buy Again: With the same car or anything with more power, I would buy either these or Michelin PS4/5/. I would probably go with an EcoContact or some similar "touring" tire for a more efficient car that I didn't intend to push.
Dry grip, warm and cold, has been excellent. In colder weather and at colder temperatures I have been able to get the rear to step out briefly (on a FWD!) before ESC kicks in, at a sharp angle; vs severe understeer on the maxxis, but I attribute that to the wear.
Otherwise, in a straight line, across motorway driving, Peak District roads, and city driving, brilliant grip so far.
Not had a great amount of driving in the wet to rate, but from what I have done, seems as good as any other tire I've tried.
Road Feedback: Not an expert but I'd say you get a lot of feedback out of them.
Handling feels very good, very grippy, able to be pushed a bit.
Wear, initial 1000 miles so not really comparable, but I've had a few times I've said "hmm, have I got tread left?" while looking from afar - but that's just visual I think.
Comfort.... More "clunky" when over potholes or bad road surface, but otherwise very smooth on motorways. Not jarring but certainly not luxurious.
Buy Again: With the same car or anything with more power, I would buy either these or Michelin PS4/5/. I would probably go with an EcoContact or some similar "touring" tire for a more efficient car that I didn't intend to push.
Given 77%
while driving a
Volkswagen Golf
(205/55 R16)
on mostly country roads
for 10,000 average miles
I will buy again. I bought tires new, and drove them for 1 year. I was amazed by wet grip. I felt like it was dry and everyone else was driving slow for no reason (not kidding). In the month may it was supposed to be warm, but it got cold close to 0°C I was worried about grip, but tires still had good traction on a wet cold motorway, which I did not expect. Previously I had older worn tires, and since worn tires have better dry grip, i was less impressed by dry grip. I will buy the PremiumContact 7 again for BMW 3er.
Given 90%
while driving a
Volkswagen Scirocco 1,4 TSI 160hp
(235/40 R18)
on a combination of roads
for 10,000 spirited miles
I bought those a year ago, when they just came out. I have to say, i am impressed. Quality of the Continental tires really shines. They were very good in any (summer) weather condition, no problem at all with soaked roads and heavy rains. Comfortable enough, good gas millage, very good grip on both wet and dry. Would buy those anytime again. PS. I wont do that cuz im a tire geek and would probably get the newer models lol. AMAZING TIRE.
Given 83%
while driving a
Mazda 3 2014
(205/55 R16)
on mostly motorways
for 15,000 easy going miles
Great braking performance in the dry and wet. Sidewalls are quite soft. Rolling resistance is actually quite good, making it quite efficient.
Down from around 8mm to 6.5mm tread after 24000km after 2 rotations.
Customer support from Continental USA is abhorrent though. Because of that, I'll choose another brand next time.
Down from around 8mm to 6.5mm tread after 24000km after 2 rotations.
Customer support from Continental USA is abhorrent though. Because of that, I'll choose another brand next time.