Menu

Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 RFT

The Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 RFT is a Ultra High Performance Winter tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

7.2
Tire Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
84%
Wet Grip
89%
Road Feedback
87%
Handling
71%
Wear
87%
Comfort
84%
Buy again
94%
Snow Grip
100%
Ice Grip
90%
7 Reviews
87% Average
14,100 miles driven
Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 RFT

Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 RFT

Winter Premium
BETA
7.2 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 7
Avg Rating: 87.4%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 2.16
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tire tests for the Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 RFT

Questions and Answers for the Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 RFT

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 RFT. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 RFT Reviews

Given 84% while driving a Mercedes Benz 190 2.3 16 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 2,000 average miles
I have these tires fitted to my w204 2008 C230 in the 225/45R17 size, and they are very good. On the dry, as long as the temperature is still low, they will perform well, but if the temp goes over 20 C, they will start to become bad at braking. Same thing for the wet. In the Snow and Ice, they are extremely good, the fact that I could climb a fairly hard incline at -11 degrees C with snow and ice in a RWD says all you need to know about these tires. I also drove them during a blizzard where the snow was about 10-20cm high, it still went through them with ease.
September 26, 2022
Given 80% while driving a BMW E91 320i (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 1,000 average miles
I've just put mine back on for at the start of their third winter. I'd agree with the other reviewer here that they completely transfer the ability of an E91 three series BMW to drive in the wintery conditions that seem to be more common. With the standard tires my touring became un-drivable in snow or ice with the 55s it had on the rear - with these on (supplied as a package with wheels from BMW) the car is transformed and easily negotiates both fresh and compacted snow and ice. I used them for six months last winter as the low temperatures lasted well into April and they seem to be lasting well.
November 30, 2013
Given 90% while driving a BMW 330i M Sport Coupe (225/45 R17 V) on mostly town for 1,800 average miles
I fitted these to my BMW E92 330i Coupe because when it snows I really struggle to get the quarter mile from my house to the main road. I did lots of research and couldn't believe the universally positive reviews given to winter tires generally - I didn't believe they could be THAT good. Believe me they are. I am simply astounded at the amount of grip and therefore confidence they give me - it almost defies the laws of physics. On Sunday night we had 6 inches of snow - the most we've had in one overnight dumping in all the years I can remember. I checked it out on foot and there was NO WAY I would have got past the first corner with my summer tires on. I drove out almost as if there was no snow ! On the most tricky bit (90 degree left, onto an uphill slope) I didn't even see the traction control light flash - it just pulled. I honestly believe my german sledge is 90% as good as a 4x4 - and better when you consider the fact that I can steer and stop when going downhill. They are honestly, genuinely amazing - if I had realised how good I would have bought them years ago. I walked round the office on Monday with a grin from ear to ear - all day.
January 25, 2013

How would you rate the Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 RFT?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 RFT Reviews

Given 90% while driving a BMW E91 325i (205/55 R16 H) on mostly motorways for 6,000 easy going miles
I used these tires last winter and now they are put on my car again. On snow they drive very well. On ice ABS & ESP may flash, but it is still OK. On dry and above freezing temperature, their braking distance is longer than the 17 inch summer tires.

As compared to the summer run flat tires, they are much softer, silent and comfortable. The steering wheel is much lighter. The tire wear is negligible too. If the summer run flat tires are half as good, I believe that much more people will stay with run flat tires instead of going to "normal" tires.
November 15, 2011
Given 99% while driving a BMW Z4 (205/55 R16 H) on a combination of roads for 300 easy going miles
I have purchased these tires for my E85 BMW Z4 2.2 automatic. I took off the 225/45/R17 Birdgestone Potenza tires and BMW wheels and fitted after market 16" wheels with 205/55/R16 91H. I am still keeping the 6 bags of sand and grvel over the rear axle and can only say that so far these tires have been outstanding. Was amazed as it ground through thick choppy snow in the uncleared works car park. I live on a hill and have to negotiate two uphill bends from the main road to my house. No problem in 4 inches of snow. No discernable difference in handling from my summer tires. Very little increase in noise. These tires have not won any winter tire tests, but reading other blogs BMW drivers seem to rate them highly and I suspect that they are one of the better choices in their RFT guise. The only thing that concerned me was the availability of replacements should I get a flat, so I bought six. If I.m luck enough to avoid punctures then I expect the rears fronts to outlast the rears, so six actually makes sense. ALthough these tires are an outgoing model the tires I bought in November 2010 from a large european online distributir were manufactured in week 43 of 2010.
December 23, 2010
Given 81% while driving a BMW E92 330i (225/45 R17 V) on mostly town for 1,000 average miles
Blizzak LM25 RFT.The uk winters are becoming less predictable every year and with temps going below zero i am glad i fitted winter tires to my vehicle. The added grip in these conditions has helped me go through 4 inches of snow which surpised me. The tires are not only safer in these conditions but the tread pattern allows effective dispersal of slush on the road. if you own a rear wheel drive vehicle i think it should be on top of your shopping list.
December 20, 2010
Rate the Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 RFT