Menu

Michelin CrossClimate 2 VS Michelin CrossClimate+

Jonathan Benson
Tested and written by Jonathan Benson
2 min read Updated
Below are all the data points for the Michelin CrossClimate 2 VS Michelin CrossClimate+, displaying how each tire performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tire's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Michelin CrossClimate 2
Michelin CrossClimate Plus

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Spread: 1.81 M (5.3%) | Avg: 35.06 M

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin CrossClimate 2 with a result of 34.15 M. The difference between best and worst was 5%.
  1. Michelin CrossClimate 2
    34.15 M
  2. Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    35.96 M

Dry Handling (s)

Spread: 1.74 s (2.2%) | Avg: 81.30 s

Dry handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: All the tires in the dry handling test finished less than 3% apart.
  1. Michelin CrossClimate 2
    80.43 s
  2. Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    82.17 s

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Spread: 1.43 M (4.9%) | Avg: 29.92 M

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin CrossClimate 2 with a result of 29.2 M. The difference between best and worst was 4.7%.
  1. Michelin CrossClimate 2
    29.2 M
  2. Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    30.63 M

Wet Handling (s)

Spread: 0.03 s (0.1%) | Avg: 49.02 s

Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: All the tires in the wet handling test finished less than 3% apart.
  1. Michelin CrossClimate 2
    49 s
  2. Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    49.03 s

Snow Performance Overview

Snow Handling (s)

Spread: 2.70 s (3%) | Avg: 92.65 s

Snow handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: All the tires in the snow handling test finished less than 3% apart.
  1. Michelin CrossClimate 2
    91.3 s
  2. Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    94 s

Value Performance Overview

Fuel Consumption (l/100km)

Spread: 0.11 l/100km (2%) | Avg: 5.61 l/100km

Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km (Lower is better)

Key Insight: All the tires in the fuel consumption test finished less than 3% apart.
  1. Michelin CrossClimate 2
    5.55 l/100km
  2. Michelin CrossClimate Plus
    5.66 l/100km

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tire Score
Michelin CrossClimate 2 0%
2 Michelin CrossClimate Plus 0%
comments powered by Disqus