Data Explorer / Tire Reviews
Michelin CrossClimate 2 VS Michelin CrossClimate+
- Tested size
- 205/55 R16
- Tires tested
- 2
- Disciplines
- 6
Set the weightings
Move a slider. The other categories rebalance automatically to keep the total at 100%.
No test-specific category weights are recorded; this starts with season defaults.
Season defaults
Results
Movement is compared with the default calculation, not the published finishing order. Scores use unrounded totals for ranking.
No ranking for this setup. Give at least one category a positive weight and include a discipline in each active category, or reset the weights.
Filtering never changes the benchmark, scores or positions.
No tires selected. Add tires to your shortlist to focus the ranking.
| ft ↓ | s ↓ | ft ↓ | s ↓ | s ↓ | l/100km ↓ | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 100.00 | 112 | 80.43 | 100.0 | 96 | 49.00 | 100.0 | 91.3 | 100.0 | 5.55 | 100.0 | |
StrengthsBetter than the CrossClimate+ in every test: shorter dry and wet braking, faster dry, wet and snow handling, and lower fuel consumption. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry100 × 28% = 28 Wet100 × 39% = 39 Snow100 × 28% = 28 Fuel Consumption100 × 5% = 5 | |||||||||||||
| 2 | 2 | 97.18 | 118 | 82.17 | 96.4 | 100 | 49.03 | 97.6 | 94.0 | 97.1 | 5.66 | 98.1 | |
StrengthsWithin a fraction of the CrossClimate 2 on the wet handling lap. ConsiderationsBehind the CrossClimate 2 for dry and wet braking, dry and snow handling and fuel consumption. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry96.43 × 28% = 27 Wet97.64 × 39% = 38.08 Snow97.13 × 28% = 27.2 Fuel Consumption98.06 × 5% = 4.9 | |||||||||||||
Raw results do not change when you move the sliders. Scroll horizontally to see every discipline.
Leading with these priorities
Michelin CrossClimate 2
These are calculated scenarios, not new test awards. The published verdict may reflect judgement, close results and factors outside this calculation.
Not ranked: a measurement needed for these weights is missing. Missing results are not treated as zero or redistributed.
Reference tires provide context only. They do not set the benchmark and cannot win the personalised ranking.
How your ranking is calculated
Each discipline is scored against the best non-reference tire in the full test field: best ÷ result × 100 when lower is better, or result ÷ best × 100 when higher is better. Discipline scores are rounded to two decimal places, then combined using your weights.
Within-category weights divide that category’s share of the overall score. A 50% wet category and 40% wet-braking share give wet braking 20% of the total. A weight is a scoring priority, not a measure of its actual effect on the ranking: the performance gaps matter too.
Published joint positions are preserved separately. Calculated positions tie only when their underlying scores match; two displayed scores can look equal after rounding.
A zero weight excludes that category or discipline. At least one active discipline is required, and the disciplines in every active category must have a positive total.
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2026 Auto Express All Season Tire Test
205/55 R168 tires tested
Tested in the same size
2026 TUV Test Report Goodyear Vector All Season 4
205/55 R165 tires tested
Tested in the same size
2025 TUV Test of Nokian SeasonProof 2 vs Rivals
205/55 R165 tires tested
Tested in the same size
Nokian Seasonproof 2 / Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
This test’s winner finished 3rd there