Data Explorer / Autozurnal
2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tire Test
- Tested size
- 215/55 R18
- Tires tested
- 10
- Disciplines
- 11
- Test vehicle
- VW iD3
Set the weightings
Move a slider. The other categories rebalance automatically to keep the total at 100%.
No test-specific category weights are recorded; this starts with season defaults.
Season defaults
Results
Movement is compared with the default calculation, not the published finishing order. Scores use unrounded totals for ranking.
No ranking for this setup. Give at least one category a positive weight and include a discipline in each active category, or reset the weights.
Filtering never changes the benchmark, scores or positions.
No tires selected. Add tires to your shortlist to focus the ranking.
| ft ↓ | Points ↑ | ft ↓ | s ↓ | s ↓ | mph ↑ | ft/s² ↑ | Points ↑ | dB ↓ | kg/t ↓ | kWh/100km ↓ | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 97.69 | 114 | 7.75 | 100.0 | 159 | 83.6 | 11.49 | 50.6 | 10.7 | 98.6 | 7.0 | 71.9 | 99.7 | 0.70 | 14.12 | 83.8 | |
StrengthsThe Hankook iON evo has the shortest dry braking by a wide margin, the fastest wet handling lap and wet circle time, the best straight-line aquaplaning and the best dry handling rating, and it is the most comfortable and second-quietest tire. ConsiderationsIts energy consumption is the third highest and its rolling resistance is below average. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry100 × 35% = 35 Wet98.65 × 50% = 49.32 Comfort99.65 × 5% = 4.98 Value83.83 × 10% = 8.38 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | 3 | 94.91 | 121 | 7.00 | 93.4 | 155 | 87.0 | 11.71 | 46.3 | 9.5 | 95.8 | 6.5 | 72.4 | 95.7 | 0.59 | 12.95 | 95.3 | |
StrengthsThe Continental UltraContact NXT has the shortest wet braking and the second-shortest dry braking, with the second-lowest rolling resistance and energy consumption. ConsiderationsHandling is only mid-field, fifth for dry handling and fourth on both wet handling tracks, and it is sixth for aquaplaning in bends. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry93.42 × 35% = 32.7 Wet95.8 × 50% = 47.9 Comfort95.74 × 5% = 4.79 Value95.31 × 10% = 9.53 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | 2 | 95.16 | 122 | 7.44 | 94.2 | 160 | 86.4 | 11.59 | 45.3 | 9.1 | 94.8 | 6.5 | 72.2 | 95.9 | 0.54 | 12.86 | 100.0 | |
StrengthsThe Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 has the lowest rolling resistance and energy consumption, the second-best dry handling rating and wet circle time, and the third-shortest dry braking. ConsiderationsIt is weak against aquaplaning: second from last in bends and joint seventh in a straight line. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry94.17 × 35% = 32.96 Wet94.8 × 50% = 47.4 Comfort95.88 × 5% = 4.79 Value100 × 10% = 10 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 4 | 5 | 92.93 | 126 | 6.69 | 90.1 | 157 | 87.3 | 12.10 | 48.3 | 10.5 | 96.0 | 6.5 | 72.7 | 95.5 | 0.68 | 13.78 | 86.2 | |
StrengthsThe Michelin Primacy 5 has the second-shortest wet braking and is third for aquaplaning both straight and in bends. ConsiderationsIts dry braking, dry handling and wet handling are only sixth, and its energy consumption is the fourth highest. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry90.08 × 35% = 31.53 Wet95.99 × 50% = 48 Comfort95.54 × 5% = 4.78 Value86.25 × 10% = 8.62 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 5 | 4 | 93.63 | 122 | 7.19 | 93.4 | 162 | 86.3 | 11.70 | 46.5 | 9.2 | 94.6 | 6.5 | 71.4 | 96.4 | 0.67 | 13.34 | 88.4 | |
StrengthsThe Pirelli Powergy is the quietest tire, second fastest on the wet handling track, third on the wet circle and third for dry handling. ConsiderationsIt is third from last for aquaplaning in bends. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry93.41 × 35% = 32.69 Wet94.56 × 50% = 47.28 Comfort96.43 × 5% = 4.82 Value88.38 × 10% = 8.84 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 6 | 7 | 90.17 | 129 | 6.13 | 86.9 | 173 | 89.7 | 12.10 | 45.3 | 9.3 | 91.1 | 6.5 | 72.7 | 95.5 | 0.60 | 12.96 | 94.3 | |
StrengthsThe Barum Bravuris 6 has the third-lowest rolling resistance and energy consumption, matching premium tires for efficiency. ConsiderationsIts dry braking is the third longest, and its handling and aquaplaning results are in the bottom half. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry86.93 × 35% = 30.43 Wet91.08 × 50% = 45.54 Comfort95.54 × 5% = 4.78 Value94.28 × 10% = 9.43 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 7 | 6 | 92.07 | 125 | 7.06 | 91.1 | 173 | 87.1 | 11.77 | 49.1 | 11.3 | 95.3 | 6.0 | 72.6 | 92.0 | 0.78 | 14.21 | 79.4 | |
StrengthsThe Sava Intensa SUV 2 is the best tire for aquaplaning in bends and second in a straight line, and fourth for dry handling. ConsiderationsIt has the second-highest energy consumption, the third-highest rolling resistance and below-average comfort. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry91.11 × 35% = 31.89 Wet95.28 × 50% = 47.64 Comfort92.03 × 5% = 4.6 Value79.44 × 10% = 7.94 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 8 | 8 | 87.76 | 127 | 5.69 | 87.1 | 188 | 93.2 | 12.55 | 44.9 | 9.9 | 87.9 | 5.5 | 72.3 | 88.7 | 0.66 | 13.27 | 88.8 | |
StrengthsThe Kormoran Ultra High Performance has the fourth-lowest rolling resistance and energy use and is the fourth-quietest tire. ConsiderationsIt is the least comfortable tire, slowest on the wet circle and second from last for wet handling, dry handling and straight-line aquaplaning. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry87.11 × 35% = 30.49 Wet87.91 × 50% = 43.96 Comfort88.67 × 5% = 4.43 Value88.82 × 10% = 8.88 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 9 | 9 | 86.06 | 134 | 5.81 | 83.7 | 191 | 91.9 | 12.19 | 45.7 | 10.1 | 89.0 | 6.0 | 72.7 | 92.0 | 0.84 | 14.40 | 76.5 | |
StrengthsThe Imperial EcoSport SUV is fourth for aquaplaning in bends. ConsiderationsIt has the highest rolling resistance and energy consumption in the test, and the second-longest dry and wet braking. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry83.72 × 35% = 29.3 Wet89.02 × 50% = 44.51 Comfort91.96 × 5% = 4.6 Value76.52 × 10% = 7.65 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10 | 10 | 83.14 | 138 | 5.44 | 80.7 | 204 | 95.4 | 12.44 | 44.2 | 8.6 | 84.4 | 6.0 | 72.9 | 91.8 | 0.79 | 13.76 | 80.8 | |
ConsiderationsThe Tomket SUV is last for dry and wet braking, dry and wet handling and both aquaplaning tests, and it is the loudest tire. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry80.7 × 35% = 28.25 Wet84.44 × 50% = 42.22 Comfort91.83 × 5% = 4.59 Value80.83 × 10% = 8.08 | ||||||||||||||||||
Raw results do not change when you move the sliders. Scroll horizontally to see every discipline.
Leading with these priorities
Hankook iON Evo
These are calculated scenarios, not new test awards. The published verdict may reflect judgement, close results and factors outside this calculation.
Not ranked: a measurement needed for these weights is missing. Missing results are not treated as zero or redistributed.
Reference tires provide context only. They do not set the benchmark and cannot win the personalised ranking.
Weighting vs real impact
What decides this ranking
The weighting is how much each category counts. The real impact is how much of the difference between the tires it creates: a discipline in which every tire performed about the same barely changes the order, however much it counts.
No weighting is recorded for this test, so the weighting here starts from Tire Reviews’ season defaults, not from the test’s own scoring.
- Dry Weighting 35% Real impact 32%
- Wet Weighting 50% Real impact 50%
- Comfort Weighting 5% Real impact 3%
- Value Weighting 10% Real impact 16%
- Wet Braking counts for 13% of the score but creates 23% of the difference between the tires, because their results in it were far apart.
- Dry Braking counts for 29.1% of the score but creates only 19% of the difference, because most tires performed about the same in it.
Every discipline 11
| Discipline | Weighting | Real impact |
|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | 29.1% | 19% |
| Subj. Dry Handling | 6% | 13% |
| Wet Braking | 13% | 23% |
| Wet Handling | 13% | 9% |
| Wet Circle | 13% | 7% |
| Straight Aqua | 5.5% | 4% |
| Curved Aquaplaning | 5.5% | 8% |
| Subj. Comfort | 2.5% | 2% |
| Noise | 2.5% | <1% |
| Rolling Resistance | 5% | 11% |
| Energy Consumption | 5% | 5% |
How it is worked out: each discipline’s weighting is multiplied by the spread of its results (the gap across the middle half of the tires, as a percentage of the best result), then shared out so that all the disciplines add up to 100%. It estimates what separates the tires; it is not a second set of weights, and it follows the weights you set.
How your ranking is calculated
Each discipline is scored against the best non-reference tire in the full test field: best ÷ result × 100 when lower is better, or result ÷ best × 100 when higher is better. Discipline scores are rounded to two decimal places, then combined using your weights.
Within-category weights divide that category’s share of the overall score. A 50% wet category and 40% wet-braking share give wet braking 20% of the total. A weight is a scoring priority, not a measure of its actual effect on the ranking: the performance gaps matter too. What decides this ranking ↑
Published joint positions are preserved separately. Calculated positions tie only when their underlying scores match; two displayed scores can look equal after rounding.
A zero weight excludes that category or discipline. At least one active discipline is required, and the disciplines in every active category must have a positive total.
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2025 DEKRA Wear Test of Michelin Primacy 5 Energy vs Rivals
215/55 R188 tires tested
3 of these 10 tires tested again
2026 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/50 R1716 tires tested
2 of these 10 tires tested again
2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tire Test
205/55 R167 tires tested
2 of these 10 tires tested again
