German motorhome magazine promobil tested seven summer tires in size 225/75 R 16 C for its April 2026 issue. This is the standard fitment for the Fiat Ducato Maxi and Heavy variants, widely used as a base for motorhomes and campervans. Testing was carried out on a loaded Ducato Maxi to simulate real-world motorhome weights, with results split across wet (50%), dry (40%), and environmental (10%) categories. The seven tires came from Barum, Continental, Firestone, Goodyear, Michelin, Nokian, and Vredestein.

The Vredestein Comtrac 2+ took the overall win with the highest score in the test (9.3 out of 10), delivering the shortest braking distances and strongest cornering grip on both wet and dry surfaces. Its only real weakness is a high rolling resistance - the worst in the group - but promobil's view is that this matters little for motorhomes, where aerodynamic drag dominates fuel consumption at highway speeds. The new Nokian Cargoproof C finished second and was close behind on braking performance. At the other end, two tires received a rating of only "eingeschränkt empfehlenswert" (recommended with reservations): the Firestone Vanhawk 3 had consistently weak wet-surface results and vague steering feel, while the Barum Vanis 3 - despite comfortable dry-road manners - fell short on wet braking and aquaplaning protection.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking: 62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking: 49.7 → 0.0 mph

Dry

Nokian and Vredestein were virtually tied for the shortest dry braking distances, stopping over 10 feet earlier than the Barum at the bottom of the table. Continental also ended up toward the back here - a pattern that continues into wet braking.

Dry Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Nokian Cargoproof C	135 ft	Best	0 mph
2Vredestein Comtrac 2+	135 ft	0 ft	4 mph
3Firestone Vanhawk 3	138 ft	+3 ft	13 mph
4Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo 2	139 ft	+4 ft	15 mph
5Michelin AGILIS 3	141 ft	+6 ft	17 mph
6Continental Vancontact Ultra	144 ft	+9 ft	21 mph
7Barum Vanis 3	145 ft	+10 ft	22 mph

The difference between best and worst was 7.8% (10 ft ≈ 0.7 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Barum Vanis 3 would still be travelling at 22 mph when the Nokian Cargoproof C had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry handling times were closely bunched, with only 1.4 mph separating the fastest (Vredestein) from the slowest (Firestone). Barum and Nokian tied for second, which is notable given the Barum's poor braking results - it clearly has decent mechanical grip in corners even if it struggles under heavy longitudinal load.

Dry Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Vredestein Comtrac 2+	49.2 mph	Best
2Nokian Cargoproof C	48.9 mph	-0.3 mph
2Barum Vanis 3	48.9 mph	-0.3 mph
4Continental Vancontact Ultra	48.8 mph	-0.4 mph
5Michelin AGILIS 3	48.7 mph	-0.5 mph
6Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo 2	48.6 mph	-0.6 mph
7Firestone Vanhawk 3	47.8 mph	-1.4 mph

All the tires in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Testers rated the Barum, Continental, and Vredestein highest for subjective dry handling, praising their predictable, forgiving balance. The Goodyear scored lower here despite having the sharpest steering response in the group - testers noted it felt nervous at the rear during fast direction changes, with a narrow window before breakaway.

Subj. Dry Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Continental Vancontact Ultra	9 Points	Best
1Vredestein Comtrac 2+	9 Points	Best
1Barum Vanis 3	9 Points	Best
4Nokian Cargoproof C	8 Points	-1.00 Points
5Michelin AGILIS 3	7 Points	-2.00 Points
5Firestone Vanhawk 3	7 Points	-2.00 Points
5Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo 2	7 Points	-2.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 22.2% (2 Points).

Wet

The gap between tires opens up significantly on wet roads. Vredestein and Nokian were well clear of the field, stopping over 10 feet shorter than the next best. Barum finished last, more than 13 feet behind the Vredestein - equivalent to hitting an obstacle at roughly 19 mph while the Vredestein has already stopped.

Wet Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Vredestein Comtrac 2+	89 ft	Best	0 mph
2Nokian Cargoproof C	90 ft	+1 ft	10 mph
3Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo 2	97 ft	+8 ft	23 mph
4Michelin AGILIS 3	100 ft	+11 ft	27 mph
5Continental Vancontact Ultra	100 ft	+11 ft	27 mph
6Firestone Vanhawk 3	102 ft	+13 ft	29 mph
7Barum Vanis 3	103 ft	+14 ft	30 mph

The difference between best and worst was 16.3% (14 ft ≈ 1 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Barum Vanis 3 would still be travelling at 30 mph when the Vredestein Comtrac 2+ had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Vredestein and Nokian again pulled ahead in wet handling lap times, continuing their dominance from the braking tests. Firestone was the slowest by a clear margin, nearly 3 mph off the pace - consistent with its weak scores across all wet tests.

Wet Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Vredestein Comtrac 2+	41.9 mph	Best
2Nokian Cargoproof C	41.5 mph	-0.4 mph
3Continental Vancontact Ultra	41.1 mph	-0.8 mph
4Michelin AGILIS 3	40.8 mph	-1.1 mph
5Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo 2	40.6 mph	-1.3 mph
6Barum Vanis 3	40.5 mph	-1.4 mph
7Firestone Vanhawk 3	39.5 mph	-2.4 mph

The difference between best and worst was 5.8% (2.4 mph).

Continental and Nokian joined Vredestein at the top of the subjective wet handling ratings. Testers noted that the Firestone felt vague and imprecise on wet roads, with an audible droning noise from the tread under cornering slip angles.

Subj. Wet Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Continental Vancontact Ultra	9 Points	Best
1Vredestein Comtrac 2+	9 Points	Best
1Nokian Cargoproof C	9 Points	Best
4Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo 2	8 Points	-1.00 Points
5Michelin AGILIS 3	7 Points	-2.00 Points
5Barum Vanis 3	7 Points	-2.00 Points
7Firestone Vanhawk 3	6 Points	-3.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 33.3% (3 Points).

Vredestein posted the highest lateral grip on the wet circle, with Continental close behind. The spread here is tighter than in braking or handling, though Firestone again sat at the bottom - its tread compound appears to be the limiting factor across all wet grip tests.

Wet Circle
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Vredestein Comtrac 2+	16.5 mph	Best
2Continental Vancontact Ultra	16.4 mph	-0.1 mph
3Nokian Cargoproof C	16.3 mph	-0.2 mph
4Barum Vanis 3	16.2 mph	-0.3 mph
5Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo 2	16.2 mph	-0.3 mph
6Michelin AGILIS 3	16.1 mph	-0.4 mph
7Firestone Vanhawk 3	15.7 mph	-0.8 mph

The difference between best and worst was 5% (0.8 mph).

Michelin led the straight-line aquaplaning test, a result that aligns with its strong tread-pattern drainage design and deep grooves. This is one of the few tests where the Vredestein didn't finish first, though it still placed second. Goodyear had the lowest aquaplaning resistance, floating up over 6 mph earlier than the Michelin.

Straight Aqua
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Michelin AGILIS 3	59.1 mph	Best
2Vredestein Comtrac 2+	58.2 mph	-0.9 mph
3Nokian Cargoproof C	56.5 mph	-2.6 mph
4Continental Vancontact Ultra	55.7 mph	-3.4 mph
5Firestone Vanhawk 3	53.3 mph	-5.8 mph
6Barum Vanis 3	52.6 mph	-6.5 mph
7Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo 2	52.3 mph	-6.8 mph

The difference between best and worst was 11.5% (6.8 mph).

Comfort

Barum, Michelin, and Vredestein shared the top subjective comfort rating. The Barum's strong showing here is worth noting - whatever compromises in its compound hurt braking grip, they seem to benefit ride quality. Continental and Firestone were rated lowest for comfort.

Subj. Comfort
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Michelin AGILIS 3	9 Points	Best
1Vredestein Comtrac 2+	9 Points	Best
1Barum Vanis 3	9 Points	Best
4Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo 2	8 Points	-1.00 Points
4Nokian Cargoproof C	8 Points	-1.00 Points
6Firestone Vanhawk 3	7 Points	-2.00 Points
6Continental Vancontact Ultra	7 Points	-2.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 22.2% (2 Points).

Michelin was the quietest tire at 70.7 dB(A), closely followed by Firestone and Continental. Vredestein and Goodyear were the loudest at 72.0 dB(A) - a 1.3 dB(A) spread across the group, which is small but perceptible. Promobil noted that for motorhomes, aerodynamic noise from the body typically masks tire noise at higher speeds anyway.

Noise
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Michelin AGILIS 3	70.7 dB	Best
2Firestone Vanhawk 3	70.8 dB	+0.10 dB
3Continental Vancontact Ultra	70.9 dB	+0.20 dB
4Barum Vanis 3	71.6 dB	+0.90 dB
5Nokian Cargoproof C	71.7 dB	+1.00 dB
6Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo 2	72 dB	+1.30 dB
6Vredestein Comtrac 2+	72 dB	+1.30 dB

All the tires in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.

Value

Continental and Michelin tied for the lowest rolling resistance at 5.4 kg/t, while the Vredestein was worst at 7.3 kg/t - a 35% difference. However, promobil pointed out that rolling resistance only dominates fuel consumption below about 44 mph; above that, the aerodynamic drag of a motorhome body is the bigger factor, which limits the real-world fuel cost penalty of higher-resistance tires.

Rolling Resistance
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Extra fuel / year
1Michelin AGILIS 3	5.4 kg/t	Best	$0
1Continental Vancontact Ultra	5.4 kg/t	Best	$0
3Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo 2	5.9 kg/t	+0.50 kg/t	$27
3Nokian Cargoproof C	5.9 kg/t	+0.50 kg/t	$27
5Barum Vanis 3	6.8 kg/t	+1.40 kg/t	$76
6Firestone Vanhawk 3	7.1 kg/t	+1.70 kg/t	$93
7Vredestein Comtrac 2+	7.3 kg/t	+1.90 kg/t	$103

The difference between best and worst was 35.2% (1.9 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Vredestein Comtrac 2+ uses about 29 gal ($103) more fuel than the Michelin AGILIS 3.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

Gas/Diesel Electric

Annual Mileage

12,000 mi

km (L)

miles (US gal)

Fuel Price

$3.60/gal

GBP (£)

EUR (€)

USD ($)

Set my vehicle consumption

Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Results

Vredestein took a clear overall win on the strength of its wet and dry grip, with Nokian in second offering a similar safety profile at a lower price. Continental placed third as a good all-rounder with the best fuel efficiency. Firestone and Barum both received a reduced recommendation due to weak wet-road performance.

Pro Mobil Test Winner / Highly Recommended Testsieger / Sehr empfehlenswert

Vredestein Comtrac 2+ is the clear test winner, delivering the shortest braking distances on both wet and dry surfaces along with the best cornering grip across all conditions. On the handling course, it was the fastest tire in every test and received high subjective marks for predictable, well-balanced behavior. Ride comfort and interior noise levels are good. The main trade-off is a high rolling resistance - the worst in the test - and comparatively loud pass-by noise. For motorhome use, where safety margins matter more than marginal fuel savings, this is a minor penalty given the large advantage in grip.

Dry99.9%

Wet99.8%

Comfort99.1%

Rolling Resistance74%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 7	135 ft	0 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 7	49.2 mph	Best in this discipline
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 7	9 Points	Best in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better	1^st / 7	89 ft	Best in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 7	41.9 mph	Best in this discipline
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 7	9 Points	Best in this discipline
Wet CircleHigher is better	1^st / 7	16.5 mph	Best in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better	2^nd / 7	58.2 mph	-0.9 mph
Subj. ComfortHigher is better	1^st / 7	9 Points	Best in this discipline
NoiseLower is better	6^th / 7	72 dB	+1.30 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	7^th / 7	7.3 kg/t	+1.90 kg/t

EU Label: C/A/72
Origin: India
Weight: 16.6 kgs
Tread: 9.2 mm
Price: 154.00

Pro Mobil Recommended Empfehlenswert

Nokian Cargoproof C is a new entry that strikes a good balance between safety performance and economy. It matched the Vredestein for dry braking and came close on wet braking, posting the second-shortest stopping distances in both cases. Cornering behavior is stable with above-average grip, though at larger steering angles the reserves thin out, and the pass-by noise is on the louder side. Rolling resistance sits in the middle of the field. Overall, it offers strong all-round performance without a serious weakness in any area.

Dry98.7%

Wet98.5%

Comfort93.8%

Rolling Resistance91.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	1^st / 7	135 ft	Best in this discipline
Dry HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 7	48.9 mph	-0.3 mph
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 7	8 Points	-1.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 7	90 ft	+1 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 7	41.5 mph	-0.4 mph
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 7	9 Points	Best in this discipline
Wet CircleHigher is better	3^rd / 7	16.3 mph	-0.2 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better	3^rd / 7	56.5 mph	-2.6 mph
Subj. ComfortHigher is better	4^th / 7	8 Points	-1.00 Points
NoiseLower is better	5^th / 7	71.7 dB	+1.00 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	3^rd / 7	5.9 kg/t	+0.50 kg/t

EU Label: B/A/72
Origin: Finland
Weight: 15.7 kgs
Tread: 8.9 mm
Price: 164.00

Pro Mobil Recommended Empfehlenswert

Continental VanContact Ultra stands out for its very low rolling resistance and quiet pass-by noise, making it the most fuel-efficient and refined tire in the group alongside the Michelin. It also scored well for lateral grip and subjective handling, with testers noting secure, predictable cornering and good lane-change stability. The weak point is braking: stopping distances on both wet and dry surfaces are longer than average. Continental positions this tire more toward van and panel-van use than heavy overcab motorhomes, and the character reflects that - safe in corners, less aggressive under hard braking.

Dry96.5%

Wet95.5%

Comfort88.8%

Rolling Resistance100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	6^th / 7	144 ft	+9 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 7	48.8 mph	-0.4 mph
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 7	9 Points	Best in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better	5^th / 7	100 ft	+11 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 7	41.1 mph	-0.8 mph
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 7	9 Points	Best in this discipline
Wet CircleHigher is better	2^nd / 7	16.4 mph	-0.1 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better	4^th / 7	55.7 mph	-3.4 mph
Subj. ComfortHigher is better	6^th / 7	7 Points	-2.00 Points
NoiseLower is better	3^rd / 7	70.9 dB	+0.20 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	1^st / 7	5.4 kg/t	Best in this discipline

EU Label: B/A/71
Origin: Slovenia
Weight: 15.9 kgs
Tread: 8.9 mm
Price: 223.00

Michelin Agilis 3 is likely the longest-wearing tire in the test, with the shallowest tread depth at 8.1 mm and the lowest rolling resistance tied with Continental. It also delivered the best aquaplaning resistance of any tire tested, both longitudinal and lateral, and is the quietest on the road. Ride comfort was rated highly. However, braking performance on wet and dry surfaces is only mid-pack, and the subjective handling notes describe it as safe but not particularly sharp. This is a tire suited to high-mileage commercial or fleet use where fuel cost and longevity take priority over outright grip.

Dry95.3%

Wet93.9%

Comfort100%

Rolling Resistance100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	5^th / 7	141 ft	+6 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 7	48.7 mph	-0.5 mph
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 7	7 Points	-2.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better	4^th / 7	100 ft	+11 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 7	40.8 mph	-1.1 mph
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 7	7 Points	-2.00 Points
Wet CircleHigher is better	6^th / 7	16.1 mph	-0.4 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better	1^st / 7	59.1 mph	Best in this discipline
Subj. ComfortHigher is better	1^st / 7	9 Points	Best in this discipline
NoiseLower is better	1^st / 7	70.7 dB	Best in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	1^st / 7	5.4 kg/t	Best in this discipline

EU Label: B/A/72
Origin: Poland
Weight: 16.1 kgs
Tread: 8.1 mm
Price: 245.00

Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo 2 showed a somewhat split personality in testing. On dry roads it was one of the more engaging tires, with the sharpest steering response in the group and good dry braking. On wet surfaces, however, grip drops off noticeably - wet braking and aquaplaning scores are below average, and testers noted the tire feels nervous at the rear during fast lane changes, with a narrow limit range before breakaway. It also has the lowest load index in the test at 118 versus 121 for all others, and is the heaviest tire at 19.0 kg. Rolling resistance is reasonable.

Dry95.8%

Wet94.2%

Comfort93.5%

Rolling Resistance91.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	4^th / 7	139 ft	+4 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 7	48.6 mph	-0.6 mph
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 7	7 Points	-2.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 7	97 ft	+8 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 7	40.6 mph	-1.3 mph
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 7	8 Points	-1.00 Points
Wet CircleHigher is better	5^th / 7	16.2 mph	-0.3 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better	7^th / 7	52.3 mph	-6.8 mph
Subj. ComfortHigher is better	4^th / 7	8 Points	-1.00 Points
NoiseLower is better	6^th / 7	72 dB	+1.30 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	3^rd / 7	5.9 kg/t	+0.50 kg/t

EU Label: B/D/70
Origin: Turkey
Weight: 19.0 kgs
Tread: 9.4 mm
Price: 201.00

Barum Vanis 3 is the budget option from the Continental group and behaves accordingly. Subjective handling on dry roads was praised as forgiving and easy to read, with decent cornering reserves and good ride comfort - the best-rated in the group for cabin refinement. The problems appear on wet roads: braking distances are among the longest, and aquaplaning protection is weak in both directions. Dry braking is also the worst in the test. At 155 Euro it is the second-cheapest tire here, but the safety shortcomings on wet surfaces led to a points deduction in the overall rating.

Dry96.4%

Wet91.8%

Comfort99.4%

Rolling Resistance79.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	7^th / 7	145 ft	+10 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 7	48.9 mph	-0.3 mph
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 7	9 Points	Best in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better	7^th / 7	103 ft	+14 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 7	40.5 mph	-1.4 mph
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 7	7 Points	-2.00 Points
Wet CircleHigher is better	4^th / 7	16.2 mph	-0.3 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better	6^th / 7	52.6 mph	-6.5 mph
Subj. ComfortHigher is better	1^st / 7	9 Points	Best in this discipline
NoiseLower is better	4^th / 7	71.6 dB	+0.90 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	5^th / 7	6.8 kg/t	+1.40 kg/t

EU Label: C/C/72
Origin: Czech Republic
Weight: 17.3 kgs
Tread: 9.9 mm
Price: 155.00

Firestone Vanhawk 3 finished last overall despite some isolated strengths. It produced good dry braking distances and was the quietest tire for pass-by noise. Beyond that, wet-surface performance was consistently poor across all tests - braking, lateral grip, handling, and aquaplaning. Testers described the steering as vague and imprecise, and noted an audible droning sound during cornering caused by slip-angle noise. Rolling resistance is high. The combination of weak wet grip and indifferent steering behavior makes it hard to recommend for motorhome use where loaded weights and high centers of gravity demand dependable tire response.

Dry95.4%

Wet89.8%

Comfort88.8%

Rolling Resistance76.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 7	138 ft	+3 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 7	47.8 mph	-1.4 mph
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 7	7 Points	-2.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better	6^th / 7	102 ft	+13 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 7	39.5 mph	-2.4 mph
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 7	6 Points	-3.00 Points
Wet CircleHigher is better	7^th / 7	15.7 mph	-0.8 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better	5^th / 7	53.3 mph	-5.8 mph
Subj. ComfortHigher is better	6^th / 7	7 Points	-2.00 Points
NoiseLower is better	2^nd / 7	70.8 dB	+0.10 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	6^th / 7	7.1 kg/t	+1.70 kg/t

EU Label: C/B/70
Origin: Turkey
Weight: 16.4 kgs
Tread: 10.2 mm
Price: 160.00

Menu

Tire shortlist

The evidence behind the verdict

Test setup & methodology

Recorded test conditions

Dry

Wet

Comfort

Value

Results

Cross-check this test