Menu

Test Charts / Pro Mobil

2026 Summer Motorhome and Van Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
225/75 R16 C
Tires tested
7
Disciplines
11
Test vehicle
Fiat Ducato Basis

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

3

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
135 ft Best 0 mph
135 ft 0 ft 4 mph
138 ft +3 ft 13 mph
139 ft +4 ft 15 mph
141 ft +6 ft 17 mph
144 ft +9 ft 21 mph
145 ft +10 ft 22 mph

The difference between best and worst was 7.8% (10 ft ≈ 0.7 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Barum Vanis 3 would still be travelling at 22 mph when the Nokian Cargoproof C had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
49.2 mph Best
48.9 mph -0.3 mph
48.9 mph -0.3 mph
48.8 mph -0.4 mph
48.7 mph -0.5 mph
48.6 mph -0.6 mph
47.8 mph -1.4 mph

All the tires in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Subj. Dry Handling

Subjective Dry Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
9 Points Best
9 Points Best
9 Points Best
8 Points -1.00 Points
7 Points -2.00 Points
7 Points -2.00 Points
7 Points -2.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 22.2% (2 Points).

Wet

5

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (50 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
89 ft Best 0 mph
90 ft +1 ft 10 mph
97 ft +8 ft 23 mph
100 ft +11 ft 27 mph
100 ft +11 ft 27 mph
102 ft +13 ft 29 mph
103 ft +14 ft 30 mph

The difference between best and worst was 16.3% (14 ft ≈ 1 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Barum Vanis 3 would still be travelling at 30 mph when the Vredestein Comtrac 2+ had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
41.9 mph Best
41.5 mph -0.4 mph
41.1 mph -0.8 mph
40.8 mph -1.1 mph
40.6 mph -1.3 mph
40.5 mph -1.4 mph
39.5 mph -2.4 mph

The difference between best and worst was 5.8% (2.4 mph).

Subj. Wet Handling

Subjective Wet Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
9 Points Best
9 Points Best
9 Points Best
8 Points -1.00 Points
7 Points -2.00 Points
7 Points -2.00 Points
6 Points -3.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 33.3% (3 Points).

Wet Circle

Lateral wet grip in m/s squared

Higher is better ↑
Wet Circle
Position / TireResultGap to best
16.5 mph Best
16.4 mph -0.1 mph
16.3 mph -0.2 mph
16.2 mph -0.3 mph
16.2 mph -0.3 mph
16.1 mph -0.4 mph
15.7 mph -0.8 mph

The difference between best and worst was 5% (0.8 mph).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
59.1 mph Best
58.2 mph -0.9 mph
56.5 mph -2.6 mph
55.7 mph -3.4 mph
53.3 mph -5.8 mph
52.6 mph -6.5 mph
52.3 mph -6.8 mph

The difference between best and worst was 11.5% (6.8 mph).

Comfort

2

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TireResultGap to best
9 Points Best
9 Points Best
9 Points Best
8 Points -1.00 Points
8 Points -1.00 Points
7 Points -2.00 Points
7 Points -2.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 22.2% (2 Points).

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
70.7 dB Best
70.8 dB +0.10 dB
70.9 dB +0.20 dB
71.6 dB +0.90 dB
71.7 dB +1.00 dB
72 dB +1.30 dB
72 dB +1.30 dB

All the tires in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
5.4 kg/t Best $0
5.4 kg/t Best $0
5.9 kg/t +0.50 kg/t $27
5.9 kg/t +0.50 kg/t $27
6.8 kg/t +1.40 kg/t $76
7.1 kg/t +1.70 kg/t $93
7.3 kg/t +1.90 kg/t $103

The difference between best and worst was 35.2% (1.9 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Vredestein Comtrac 2+ uses about 29 gal ($103) more fuel than the Michelin AGILIS 3.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
49.7 → 0.0 mph

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.