Top Tire Review has put three EV tires head to head on a Tesla Model 3 to answer a question every owner eventually asks: is the tire the car came on actually the best choice, or can a premium replacement do better? All three were fitted in 235/45 R18 and run through the same wet, dry, interior-noise and rolling-resistance programme, with the score weighted towards wet performance (40%), then dry (30%), noise and comfort (15%) and rolling resistance (15%) - a split that reflects what matters most to EV drivers, where range and cabin quiet come to the fore.
Two of the three tires are Tesla original-equipment (OE) fitments - the Giti Control P10 and the Bridgestone Turanza T005 EV both come as factory rubber on the Model 3 - while the Michelin e.Primacy is an aftermarket replacement. That framing makes the outcome all the more striking, because the standout tire here is the Giti Control P10. Seeing a value brand like Giti supplying original equipment on a Tesla at all is genuinely impressive, and to then have that OE tire win the test outright, ahead of a premium replacement Michelin and the OE Bridgestone, says a great deal about how quickly the challenger brands have closed the gap.
The Michelin e.Primacy took second as the strongest replacement option, quietest in the cabin and shortest under dry braking, but it carried the highest rolling resistance of the three and so gives up EV range. The Bridgestone Turanza T005 EV, the other OE tire, finished last, comfortable and efficient but short of grip and handling. In short, one Tesla OE tire topped the test and the other propped it up.
Wet
Wet grip is where the winner made its case. The Giti Control P10 stopped shortest in the wet, set the fastest wet handling lap and scored highest for wet steering feel, sweeping all three wet tests. The Bridgestone Turanza T005 EV was the weakest in the wet across the board, with the Michelin in between.
Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 107 ft | Best | |
| 112 ft | +5 ft | |
| 115 ft | +8 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 7.3% (8 ft ≈ 0.5 Car Lengths).
Wet Handling
Wet handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 30.8 s | Best | |
| 31.2 s | +0.40 s | |
| 31.4 s | +0.60 s |
All the tires in the Wet Handling test finished less than 3% apart.
Subj. Wet Handling
Subjective Wet Handling Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Points | Best | |
| 6.8 Points | -0.20 Points | |
| 6.7 Points | -0.30 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 4.3% (0.3 Points).
Dry
The dry was closer. The Michelin e.Primacy stopped shortest under dry braking, but the Giti was quickest around the dry handling course and level with the Michelin on subjective feel. The Bridgestone again trailed, and its subjective dry handling in particular dropped away from the other two.
Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 129 ft | Best | |
| 132 ft | +3 ft | |
| 132 ft | +3 ft |
All the tires in the Dry Braking test finished less than 3% apart.
Subj. Dry Handling
Subjective Dry Handling Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Points | Best | |
| 7 Points | Best | |
| 6 Points | -1.00 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 14.3% (1 Points).
Dry Handling
Dry handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 30.4 s | Best | |
| 31 s | +0.60 s | |
| 32 s | +1.60 s |
The difference between best and worst was 5.3% (1.6 s).
Noise and Comfort
Interior noise carries extra weight in an EV, where there is no engine to cover road roar. The Michelin e.Primacy was the most refined tire here, quietest on both smooth tarmac, which mainly reflects tread pattern noise, and coarse surfaces, which bring out road roar and cabin resonance. The Giti was the loudest of the three, though the margins were small.
Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 68.9 dB | Best | |
| 69.4 dB | +0.50 dB | |
| 69.6 dB | +0.70 dB |
All the tires in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.
Rough Noise
Internal rough surface noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 81.8 dB | Best | |
| 82.1 dB | +0.30 dB | |
| 82.8 dB | +1.00 dB |
All the tires in the Rough Noise test finished less than 3% apart.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance feeds directly into EV range, and here the Giti Control P10 was the clear leader, the most efficient tire of the three by a decent step. The Bridgestone was next, while the Michelin e.Primacy carried the highest resistance and would trim range the most, the one clear cost of its comfort-first character.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra energy / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5.5 kg/t | Best | $0 | |
| 6.2 kg/t | +0.70 kg/t | $17 | |
| 7 kg/t | +1.50 kg/t | $36 |
The difference between best and worst was 27.3% (1.5 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $0.15/kWh, the Michelin e.Primacy uses about 237 kWh ($36) more electricity than the Giti Control P10.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.
Results
Across the full weighting the Giti Control P10 is the best-balanced tire for the Tesla Model 3 in this test, winning on wet grip, dry handling and efficiency, with only interior noise counting against it. The Michelin e.Primacy is the pick for quiet and durability, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 EV the most comfort-focused of the trio. The full data set and the original write-up are published by Top Tire Review in their Tesla Model 3 EV tire test.
Giti Control P10
235/45 R18Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (9)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 3 | 132 ft | +3 ft |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 1st / 3 | 30.4 s | Best in this discipline |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 3 | 7 Points | Best in this discipline |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 1st / 3 | 107 ft | Best in this discipline |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 1st / 3 | 30.8 s | Best in this discipline |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 3 | 7 Points | Best in this discipline |
| NoiseLower is better | 3rd / 3 | 69.6 dB | +0.70 dB |
| Rough NoiseLower is better | 3rd / 3 | 82.8 dB | +1.00 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 1st / 3 | 5.5 kg/t | Best in this discipline |
Michelin e.Primacy
235/45 R18Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (9)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 1st / 3 | 129 ft | Best in this discipline |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 2nd / 3 | 31 s | +0.60 s |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 3 | 7 Points | Best in this discipline |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 3 | 112 ft | +5 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 2nd / 3 | 31.2 s | +0.40 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 2nd / 3 | 6.8 Points | -0.20 Points |
| NoiseLower is better | 1st / 3 | 68.9 dB | Best in this discipline |
| Rough NoiseLower is better | 1st / 3 | 81.8 dB | Best in this discipline |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 3rd / 3 | 7 kg/t | +1.50 kg/t |
Bridgestone Turanza T005 EV
235/45 R18Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (9)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 3 | 132 ft | +3 ft |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 3rd / 3 | 32 s | +1.60 s |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 3 | 6 Points | -1.00 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 3 | 115 ft | +8 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 3rd / 3 | 31.4 s | +0.60 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 3 | 6.7 Points | -0.30 Points |
| NoiseLower is better | 2nd / 3 | 69.4 dB | +0.50 dB |
| Rough NoiseLower is better | 2nd / 3 | 82.1 dB | +0.30 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 2nd / 3 | 6.2 kg/t | +0.70 kg/t |


Discussion