Below are all the data points for the 2025 Moottori Summer Tire Test, displaying how each tire performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tire's plot, the better its overall performance.

How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Momo Outrun M20 Pro

Nokian Hakka Blue 3

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Fulda EcoControl HP2

BFGoodrich Advantage

Yokohama BluEarth GT AE51

Gislaved Ultra Speed 2

Barum Bravuris 5HM

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Spread: 2.22 M (9.6%) | Avg: 24.19 M

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Nokian Hakka Blue 3 with a result of 23.18 M. The difference between best and worst was 8.7%.

Nokian Hakka Blue 3

23.18 M
Hankook Ventus Prime 4

23.26 M
BFGoodrich Advantage

23.58 M
Yokohama BluEarth GT AE51

24 M
Fulda EcoControl HP2

24.33 M
Gislaved Ultra Speed 2

24.47 M
Barum Bravuris 5HM

25.29 M
Momo Outrun M20 Pro

25.4 M

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Spread: 2.90 M (11.9%) | Avg: 26.03 M

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Nokian Hakka Blue 3 with a result of 24.43 M. The difference between best and worst was 10.6%.

Nokian Hakka Blue 3

24.43 M
Hankook Ventus Prime 4

24.91 M
BFGoodrich Advantage

25.15 M
Fulda EcoControl HP2

25.99 M
Yokohama BluEarth GT AE51

26.2 M
Gislaved Ultra Speed 2

26.98 M
Barum Bravuris 5HM

27.25 M
Momo Outrun M20 Pro

27.33 M

Wet Handling (s)

Spread: 1.88 s (2.6%) | Avg: 73.14 s

Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: All the tires in the wet handling test finished less than 3% apart.

BFGoodrich Advantage

72.12 s
Hankook Ventus Prime 4

72.56 s
Nokian Hakka Blue 3

72.8 s
Yokohama BluEarth GT AE51

73.18 s
Fulda EcoControl HP2

73.31 s
Barum Bravuris 5HM

73.42 s
Gislaved Ultra Speed 2

73.72 s
Momo Outrun M20 Pro

74 s

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Spread: 3.60 Km/H (4.1%) | Avg: 85.45 Km/H

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Fulda EcoControl HP2 with a result of 87.2 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 4.1%.

Fulda EcoControl HP2

87.2 Km/H
BFGoodrich Advantage

86.9 Km/H
Barum Bravuris 5HM

86.7 Km/H
Nokian Hakka Blue 3

86.1 Km/H
Gislaved Ultra Speed 2

85.1 Km/H
Momo Outrun M20 Pro

84.3 Km/H
Yokohama BluEarth GT AE51

83.7 Km/H
Hankook Ventus Prime 4

83.6 Km/H

Comfort Performance Overview

Noise (dB)

Spread: 1.30 dB (1.9%) | Avg: 68.64 dB

External noise in dB (Lower is better)

Key Insight: All the tires in the noise test finished less than 3% apart.

Nokian Hakka Blue 3

67.9 dB
Gislaved Ultra Speed 2

68.5 dB
Hankook Ventus Prime 4

68.6 dB
Barum Bravuris 5HM

68.6 dB
Yokohama BluEarth GT AE51

68.7 dB
Fulda EcoControl HP2

68.8 dB
BFGoodrich Advantage

68.8 dB
Momo Outrun M20 Pro

69.2 dB

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position	Tire	Score
	Nokian Hakka Blue 3	0%
2	BFGoodrich Advantage	0%
3	Hankook Ventus Prime 4	0%
4	Fulda EcoControl HP2	0%
5	Yokohama BluEarth GT AE51	0%
6	Gislaved Ultra Speed 2	0%
7	Barum Bravuris 5HM	0%
8	Momo Outrun M20 Pro	0%

Menu

2025 Moottori Summer Tire Test