2025 Autobild Sports Cars UUHP Tire Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
May 16, 2025
Below are all the data points for the 2025 Autobild Sports Cars UUHP Tire Test, displaying how each tire performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tire's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Continental SportContact 7
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
Falken Azenis RS820
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Gripmax SuperGrip Pro Sport

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental SportContact 7 with a result of 31.2 M. The difference between best and worst was 14.5%.

Dry Handling (Km/H)

Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S with a result of 104.3 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 4.1%.

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental SportContact 7 with a result of 43.7 M. The difference between best and worst was 20.4%.

Wet Handling (Km/H)

Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental SportContact 7 with a result of 78.1 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 4.4%.

Wet Circle (s)

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental SportContact 7 with a result of 10.83 s. The difference between best and worst was 7.4%.

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 with a result of 105.2 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 4.5%.

Curved Aquaplaning (m/sec2)

Remaining lateral acceleration (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental SportContact 7 with a result of 2.12 m/sec2. The difference between best and worst was 12.3%.

Comfort Performance Overview

Noise (dB)

External noise in dB (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Vredestein Ultrac Pro with a result of 72 dB. The difference between best and worst was 3.5%.

Value Performance Overview

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Vredestein Ultrac Pro with a result of 8 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 14%.

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tire Score
1 Continental SportContact 7 0%
2 Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S 0%
3 Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport 0%
4 Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 0%
5 Falken Azenis RS820 0%
6 Vredestein Ultrac Pro 0%
7 Gripmax SuperGrip Pro Sport 0%

Similar Tire Tests

Show All summer tire tests
2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tire Test
March 2025 205/55 R16 Continental UltraContact NXT 7 tires
2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tire Test
March 2025 225/45 R17 Michelin Primacy 5 14 tires
2025 AMS Sustainability Tire Test
March 2025 215/55 R17 Continental UltraContact NXT 6 tires
2025 Sports Cars Tire Test
March 2025 245/35 R19 Continental SportContact 7 8 tires
2025 Sport Auto UUHP Tire Test
March 2025 285/30 R20 Continental SportContact 7 4 tires
2025 EV Tire Test
March 2025 215/55 R18 Hankook iON Evo 8 tires
comments powered by Disqus