Below are all the data points for the 2025 Autobild Sports Cars UUHP Tire Test, displaying how each tire performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tire's plot, the better its overall performance.

How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Continental SportContact 7

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2

Gripmax SuperGrip Pro Sport

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport

Falken Azenis RS820

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Spread: 5.30 M (17%) | Avg: 33.93 M

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental SportContact 7 with a result of 31.2 M. The difference between best and worst was 14.5%.

Continental SportContact 7

31.2 M
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

33 M
Falken Azenis RS820

33.1 M
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport

34.1 M
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2

34.4 M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro

35.2 M
Gripmax SuperGrip Pro Sport

36.5 M

Dry Handling (Km/H)

Spread: 4.30 Km/H (4.1%) | Avg: 102.33 Km/H

Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S with a result of 104.3 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 4.1%.

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

104.3 Km/H
Continental SportContact 7

104 Km/H
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport

103.7 Km/H
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2

101.9 Km/H
Falken Azenis RS820

101.6 Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro

100.8 Km/H
Gripmax SuperGrip Pro Sport

100 Km/H

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Spread: 11.20 M (25.6%) | Avg: 48.89 M

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental SportContact 7 with a result of 43.7 M. The difference between best and worst was 20.4%.

Continental SportContact 7

43.7 M
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

47.6 M
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport

47.8 M
Falken Azenis RS820

48.1 M
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2

48.9 M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro

51.2 M
Gripmax SuperGrip Pro Sport

54.9 M

Wet Handling (Km/H)

Spread: 3.40 Km/H (4.4%) | Avg: 76.24 Km/H

Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental SportContact 7 with a result of 78.1 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 4.4%.

Continental SportContact 7

78.1 Km/H
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2

77.2 Km/H
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport

77.1 Km/H
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

76.4 Km/H
Falken Azenis RS820

75.4 Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro

74.8 Km/H
Gripmax SuperGrip Pro Sport

74.7 Km/H

Wet Circle (s)

Spread: 0.86 s (7.9%) | Avg: 11.15 s

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental SportContact 7 with a result of 10.83 s. The difference between best and worst was 7.4%.

Continental SportContact 7

10.83 s
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

10.99 s
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport

11.02 s
Falken Azenis RS820

11.03 s
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2

11.18 s
Vredestein Ultrac Pro

11.33 s
Gripmax SuperGrip Pro Sport

11.69 s

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Spread: 4.70 Km/H (4.5%) | Avg: 103.44 Km/H

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 with a result of 105.2 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 4.5%.

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2

105.2 Km/H
Continental SportContact 7

104.8 Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro

104.5 Km/H
Gripmax SuperGrip Pro Sport

103.7 Km/H
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport

103.4 Km/H
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

102 Km/H
Falken Azenis RS820

100.5 Km/H

Curved Aquaplaning (m/sec2)

Spread: 0.26 m/sec2 (12.3%) | Avg: 2.03 m/sec2

Remaining lateral acceleration (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental SportContact 7 with a result of 2.12 m/sec2. The difference between best and worst was 12.3%.

Continental SportContact 7

2.12 m/sec2
Vredestein Ultrac Pro

2.11 m/sec2
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport

2.09 m/sec2
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

2.04 m/sec2
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2

1.99 m/sec2
Gripmax SuperGrip Pro Sport

1.98 m/sec2
Falken Azenis RS820

1.86 m/sec2

Comfort Performance Overview

Noise (dB)

Spread: 2.60 dB (3.6%) | Avg: 73.17 dB

External noise in dB (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Vredestein Ultrac Pro with a result of 72 dB. The difference between best and worst was 3.5%.

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

72 dB
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2

72.6 dB
Gripmax SuperGrip Pro Sport

72.6 dB
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport

73.1 dB
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

73.6 dB
Falken Azenis RS820

73.7 dB
Continental SportContact 7

74.6 dB

Value Performance Overview

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Spread: 1.30 kg / t (16.3%) | Avg: 8.51 kg / t

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Vredestein Ultrac Pro with a result of 8 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 14%.

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

8 kg / t
Gripmax SuperGrip Pro Sport

8 kg / t
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

8.4 kg / t
Continental SportContact 7

8.5 kg / t
Falken Azenis RS820

8.5 kg / t
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2

8.9 kg / t
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport

9.3 kg / t

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position	Tire	Score
	Continental SportContact 7	0%
2	Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S	0%
3	Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport	0%
4	Nexen N Fera Sport SU2	0%
5	Falken Azenis RS820	0%
6	Vredestein Ultrac Pro	0%
7	Gripmax SuperGrip Pro Sport	0%

Menu

2025 Autobild Sports Cars UUHP Tire Test