Performance Overview
This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.
Dry Performance Overview
Dry Braking (M)
Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)
Dry Handling (Km/H)
Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
Wet Performance Overview
Wet Braking (M)
Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)
Wet Handling (Km/H)
Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
Wet Circle (s)
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds (Lower is better)
Straight Aqua (Km/H)
Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)
Curved Aquaplaning (m/sec2)
Remaining lateral acceleration (Higher is better)
Comfort Performance Overview
Noise (dB)
External noise in dB (Lower is better)
Value Performance Overview
Wear (KM)
Predicted tread life in KM (Higher is better)
Value (Price/1000)
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear (Lower is better)
Rolling Resistance (kg / t)
Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)
Energy Consumption (kWh/100km)
Energy consumption in kW hours per 100 km (Lower is better)
Abrasion (g)
Total weight loss after wear test in grams (Lower is better)
Overall Findings
Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:
Position | Tire | Score |
---|---|---|
1 | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV | 0% |
2 | Continental PremiumContact 7 | 0% |
3 | Hankook iON evo SUV | 0% |
4 | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | 0% |
5 | Falken e.Ziex | 0% |
6 | GT-Radial Sport Active 2 EV | 0% |
7 | Bridgestone Potenza Sport | 0% |
8 | Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco | 0% |
9 | Michelin Pilot Sport EV | 0% |