Test Charts / Auto Bild Allrad
2024 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 245/45 R18
- Tires tested
- 12
- Disciplines
- 12
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tires
Select tires to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
2Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
116 ft | -18 ft |
| 134 ft | Best | |
| 134 ft | 0 ft | |
| 135 ft | +1 ft | |
| 135 ft | +1 ft | |
| 136 ft | +2 ft | |
| 137 ft | +3 ft | |
| 137 ft | +3 ft | |
| 139 ft | +5 ft | |
| 140 ft | +6 ft | |
| 140 ft | +6 ft | |
| 141 ft | +7 ft | |
| 142 ft | +8 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 22% (26 ft ≈ 1.7 Car Lengths).
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
66.5 mph | +0.4 mph |
| 66.1 mph | Best | |
| 66.1 mph | 0.0 mph | |
| 65.6 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 65.5 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 65.4 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 65.3 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 65.2 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 65.2 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 65.2 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 65.1 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 65.1 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 64.6 mph | -1.5 mph |
All the tires in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.
Wet
5Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
90 ft | -12 ft | 0 mph |
| 102 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 105 ft | +3 ft | 14 mph | |
| 106 ft | +4 ft | 16 mph | |
| 106 ft | +4 ft | 17 mph | |
| 107 ft | +5 ft | 17 mph | |
| 107 ft | +5 ft | 18 mph | |
| 110 ft | +8 ft | 22 mph | |
| 112 ft | +10 ft | 24 mph | |
| 113 ft | +11 ft | 25 mph | |
| 114 ft | +12 ft | 26 mph | |
| 117 ft | +15 ft | 29 mph | |
| 141 ft | +39 ft | 42 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 56.6% (51 ft ≈ 3.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Imperial ICE Plus S210 would still be travelling at 42 mph when the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
55.3 mph | +2.0 mph |
| 53.3 mph | Best | |
| 52.6 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 52.2 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 52.1 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 52.1 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 51.6 mph | -1.7 mph | |
| 51.6 mph | -1.7 mph | |
| 51.4 mph | -1.9 mph | |
| 51.3 mph | -2.0 mph | |
| 51.0 mph | -2.3 mph | |
| 50.5 mph | -2.8 mph | |
| 47.7 mph | -5.6 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 13.8% (7.6 mph).
Wet Circle
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
14.89 s | -0.91 s |
| 15.8 s | Best | |
| 15.82 s | +0.02 s | |
| 15.84 s | +0.04 s | |
| 16.02 s | +0.22 s | |
| 16.16 s | +0.36 s | |
| 16.2 s | +0.40 s | |
| 16.25 s | +0.45 s | |
| 16.26 s | +0.46 s | |
| 16.27 s | +0.47 s | |
| 16.42 s | +0.62 s | |
| 16.54 s | +0.74 s | |
| 17.02 s | +1.22 s |
The difference between best and worst was 14.3% (2.13 s).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in mph
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
51.0 mph | +0.5 mph |
| 50.5 mph | Best | |
| 50.3 mph | -0.2 mph | |
| 48.8 mph | -1.7 mph | |
| 48.7 mph | -1.8 mph | |
| 48.4 mph | -2.1 mph | |
| 47.8 mph | -2.7 mph | |
| 46.8 mph | -3.7 mph | |
| 46.7 mph | -3.8 mph | |
| 45.6 mph | -4.9 mph | |
| 44.6 mph | -5.9 mph | |
| 43.4 mph | -7.1 mph | |
| 42.8 mph | -7.7 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 16% (8.2 mph).
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
10.6 ft/s² | +0.4 ft/s² |
| 10.2 ft/s² | Best | |
| 10.1 ft/s² | -0.1 ft/s² | |
| 9.8 ft/s² | -0.4 ft/s² | |
| 9.4 ft/s² | -0.8 ft/s² | |
| 9.3 ft/s² | -0.9 ft/s² | |
| 9.0 ft/s² | -1.2 ft/s² | |
| 8.9 ft/s² | -1.3 ft/s² | |
| 8.6 ft/s² | -1.6 ft/s² | |
| 8.5 ft/s² | -1.7 ft/s² | |
| 8.4 ft/s² | -1.8 ft/s² | |
| 8.1 ft/s² | -2.1 ft/s² | |
| 7.7 ft/s² | -2.5 ft/s² |
The difference between best and worst was 27% (2.9 ft/s²).
Snow
3Snow Braking
Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 67 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 70 ft | +3 ft | 16 mph | |
| 70 ft | +3 ft | 16 mph | |
| 71 ft | +4 ft | 17 mph | |
| 71 ft | +4 ft | 18 mph | |
| 71 ft | +4 ft | 18 mph | |
| 72 ft | +5 ft | 20 mph | |
| 72 ft | +5 ft | 21 mph | |
| 73 ft | +6 ft | 23 mph | |
| 76 ft | +9 ft | 27 mph | |
| 76 ft | +9 ft | 28 mph | |
| 88 ft | +21 ft | 39 mph | |
RefReference Summer |
178 ft | +111 ft | 63 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 165.4% (111 ft ≈ 7.5 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Imperial ICE Plus S210 would still be travelling at 39 mph when the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Snow Traction
Pulling Force in pounds-force
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 647 lbf | Best | |
| 642 lbf | -5 lbf | |
| 634 lbf | -13 lbf | |
| 617 lbf | -30 lbf | |
| 612 lbf | -35 lbf | |
| 610 lbf | -37 lbf | |
| 607 lbf | -40 lbf | |
| 605 lbf | -42 lbf | |
| 601 lbf | -46 lbf | |
| 597 lbf | -50 lbf | |
| 589 lbf | -58 lbf | |
| 480 lbf | -167 lbf | |
RefReference Summer |
82 lbf | -565 lbf |
The difference between best and worst was 87.3% (565 lbf).
Snow Handling
Snow handling average speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 40.4 mph | Best | |
| 40.2 mph | -0.2 mph | |
| 39.8 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 39.6 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 39.5 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 39.3 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 39.3 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 39.0 mph | -1.4 mph | |
| 38.8 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 38.5 mph | -1.9 mph | |
| 38.5 mph | -1.9 mph | |
| 36.0 mph | -4.4 mph | |
RefReference Summer |
19.9 mph | -20.5 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 50.8% (20.5 mph).
Comfort
1Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 72.8 dB | Best | |
| 72.9 dB | +0.10 dB | |
| 73 dB | +0.20 dB | |
| 73.2 dB | +0.40 dB | |
| 73.2 dB | +0.40 dB | |
| 73.6 dB | +0.80 dB | |
RefReference Summer |
73.7 dB | +0.90 dB |
| 73.8 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 73.8 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 73.9 dB | +1.10 dB | |
| 74.1 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 74.3 dB | +1.50 dB | |
| 74.6 dB | +1.80 dB |
All the tires in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.
Value
1Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.21 kg/t | Best | $0 | |
| 7.27 kg/t | +0.06 kg/t | $2 | |
| 7.49 kg/t | +0.28 kg/t | $11 | |
RefReference Summer |
7.52 kg/t | +0.31 kg/t | $13 |
| 7.66 kg/t | +0.45 kg/t | $18 | |
| 7.68 kg/t | +0.47 kg/t | $19 | |
| 7.84 kg/t | +0.63 kg/t | $26 | |
| 7.95 kg/t | +0.74 kg/t | $30 | |
| 7.97 kg/t | +0.76 kg/t | $31 | |
| 8.25 kg/t | +1.04 kg/t | $42 | |
| 8.47 kg/t | +1.26 kg/t | $51 | |
| 8.49 kg/t | +1.28 kg/t | $52 | |
| 8.54 kg/t | +1.33 kg/t | $54 |
The difference between best and worst was 18.4% (1.33 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Imperial ICE Plus S210 uses about 15 gal ($54) more fuel than the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Wet Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Snow Braking
- 31.1 → 0.0 mph
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2025 Winter Tire Braking Test - 52 Sets!
225/40 R1851 tires tested
9 of these 12 tires tested again
2023 Winter Tire Test 54 Set Braking Test
225/45 R1854 tires tested
9 of these 12 tires tested again
2023 Tire Reviews Winter Tire Test
225/45 R1811 tires tested
8 of these 12 tires tested again
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 / Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
This test’s winner finished 1st there
