Test Charts / Vi Bilagare

2023 Studded Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size: 225/45 R17
Tires tested: 8
Disciplines: 14

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

Dry Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8	103 ft	Best	0 mph
2Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2	105 ft	+2 ft	12 mph
3Goodride IceMaster Spike Z 506	106 ft	+3 ft	14 mph
4Michelin X Ice North 4	106 ft	+3 ft	14 mph
5Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10	107 ft	+4 ft	16 mph
6Continental IceContact 3	108 ft	+5 ft	16 mph
7Hankook Winter i pike RS2	108 ft	+5 ft	17 mph
8Falken Winterpeak F Ice 1	109 ft	+6 ft	19 mph

The difference between best and worst was 6.1% (6 ft ≈ 0.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Falken Winterpeak F Ice 1 would still be travelling at 19 mph when the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Subj. Dry Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Michelin X Ice North 4	5 Points	Best
1Continental IceContact 3	5 Points	Best
3Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8	4 Points	-1.00 Points
3Goodride IceMaster Spike Z 506	4 Points	-1.00 Points
5Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10	3 Points	-2.00 Points
6Hankook Winter i pike RS2	2 Points	-3.00 Points
6Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2	2 Points	-3.00 Points
6Falken Winterpeak F Ice 1	2 Points	-3.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 60% (3 Points).

Wet

Wet Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Hankook Winter i pike RS2	118 ft	Best	0 mph
2Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2	118 ft	0 ft	4 mph
3Falken Winterpeak F Ice 1	121 ft	+3 ft	14 mph
4Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8	121 ft	+3 ft	14 mph
5Michelin X Ice North 4	123 ft	+5 ft	17 mph
6Continental IceContact 3	124 ft	+6 ft	18 mph
7Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10	127 ft	+9 ft	21 mph
8Goodride IceMaster Spike Z 506	129 ft	+11 ft	23 mph

The difference between best and worst was 9.3% (11 ft ≈ 0.7 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Goodride IceMaster Spike Z 506 would still be travelling at 23 mph when the Hankook Winter i pike RS2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Continental IceContact 3	41.1 s	Best
2Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2	41.2 s	+0.10 s
3Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10	41.4 s	+0.30 s
3Falken Winterpeak F Ice 1	41.4 s	+0.30 s
5Hankook Winter i pike RS2	41.5 s	+0.40 s
6Michelin X Ice North 4	41.8 s	+0.70 s
7Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8	41.9 s	+0.80 s
8Goodride IceMaster Spike Z 506	42.6 s	+1.50 s

The difference between best and worst was 3.6% (1.5 s).

Straight Aqua
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Falken Winterpeak F Ice 1	36.7 mph	Best
2Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2	35.6 mph	-1.1 mph
3Hankook Winter i pike RS2	35.3 mph	-1.4 mph
4Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8	35.1 mph	-1.6 mph
5Goodride IceMaster Spike Z 506	35.0 mph	-1.7 mph
6Michelin X Ice North 4	34.7 mph	-2.0 mph
7Continental IceContact 3	34.3 mph	-2.4 mph
8Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10	34.2 mph	-2.5 mph

The difference between best and worst was 6.8% (2.5 mph).

Snow

Snow Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Goodride IceMaster Spike Z 506	42 ft	Best	0 mph
2Hankook Winter i pike RS2	42 ft	0 ft	3 mph
3Falken Winterpeak F Ice 1	42 ft	0 ft	5 mph
4Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10	43 ft	+1 ft	9 mph
4Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2	43 ft	+1 ft	9 mph
6Continental IceContact 3	43 ft	+1 ft	9 mph
7Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8	43 ft	+1 ft	11 mph
8Michelin X Ice North 4	43 ft	+1 ft	15 mph

The difference between best and worst was 3.4% (1 ft). From 80 mph, the Michelin X Ice North 4 would still be travelling at 15 mph when the Goodride IceMaster Spike Z 506 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2	4.79 s	Best
2Michelin X Ice North 4	4.83 s	+0.04 s
3Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8	4.84 s	+0.05 s
3Continental IceContact 3	4.84 s	+0.05 s
5Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10	4.85 s	+0.06 s
6Falken Winterpeak F Ice 1	4.86 s	+0.07 s
7Goodride IceMaster Spike Z 506	4.87 s	+0.08 s
8Hankook Winter i pike RS2	4.9 s	+0.11 s

All the tires in the Snow Traction test finished less than 3% apart.

Snow Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10	74.8 s	Best
2Continental IceContact 3	75.1 s	+0.30 s
3Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2	75.3 s	+0.50 s
4Michelin X Ice North 4	75.5 s	+0.70 s
5Falken Winterpeak F Ice 1	76.1 s	+1.30 s
6Hankook Winter i pike RS2	76.7 s	+1.90 s
7Goodride IceMaster Spike Z 506	78.7 s	+3.90 s
8Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8	79 s	+4.20 s

The difference between best and worst was 5.6% (4.2 s).

Ice

Ice Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10	42 ft	Best	0 mph
2Michelin X Ice North 4	42 ft	0 ft	9 mph
3Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2	43 ft	+1 ft	10 mph
4Falken Winterpeak F Ice 1	48 ft	+6 ft	28 mph
5Hankook Winter i pike RS2	52 ft	+10 ft	35 mph
6Continental IceContact 3	56 ft	+14 ft	40 mph
7Goodride IceMaster Spike Z 506	56 ft	+14 ft	40 mph
8Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8	62 ft	+20 ft	46 mph

The difference between best and worst was 49% (20 ft ≈ 1.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8 would still be travelling at 46 mph when the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Ice Traction
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Michelin X Ice North 4	5.55 s	Best
2Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10	5.74 s	+0.19 s
3Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2	6.09 s	+0.54 s
4Hankook Winter i pike RS2	6.41 s	+0.86 s
5Falken Winterpeak F Ice 1	6.51 s	+0.96 s
6Goodride IceMaster Spike Z 506	7.53 s	+1.98 s
7Continental IceContact 3	7.88 s	+2.33 s
8Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8	8.66 s	+3.11 s

The difference between best and worst was 56% (3.11 s).

Ice Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10	39.3 s	Best
2Michelin X Ice North 4	39.6 s	+0.30 s
2Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2	39.6 s	+0.30 s
4Continental IceContact 3	40.8 s	+1.50 s
5Falken Winterpeak F Ice 1	41 s	+1.70 s
6Hankook Winter i pike RS2	42.2 s	+2.90 s
7Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8	42.6 s	+3.30 s
8Goodride IceMaster Spike Z 506	44.1 s	+4.80 s

The difference between best and worst was 12.2% (4.8 s).

Comfort

Subj. Comfort
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Continental IceContact 3	5 Points	Best
2Hankook Winter i pike RS2	4 Points	-1.00 Points
3Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8	3 Points	-2.00 Points
3Michelin X Ice North 4	3 Points	-2.00 Points
3Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10	3 Points	-2.00 Points
3Goodride IceMaster Spike Z 506	3 Points	-2.00 Points
7Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2	2 Points	-3.00 Points
7Falken Winterpeak F Ice 1	2 Points	-3.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 60% (3 Points).

Noise
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Continental IceContact 3	75 dB	Best
2Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8	75.4 dB	+0.40 dB
2Hankook Winter i pike RS2	75.4 dB	+0.40 dB
2Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2	75.4 dB	+0.40 dB
5Goodride IceMaster Spike Z 506	75.5 dB	+0.50 dB
6Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10	75.6 dB	+0.60 dB
7Michelin X Ice North 4	75.8 dB	+0.80 dB
8Falken Winterpeak F Ice 1	76 dB	+1.00 dB

All the tires in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.

Value

Rolling Resistance
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Extra fuel / year
1Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8	5.05 kg/t	Best	$0
2Hankook Winter i pike RS2	5.15 kg/t	+0.10 kg/t	$6
3Goodride IceMaster Spike Z 506	5.3 kg/t	+0.25 kg/t	$15
4Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10	5.35 kg/t	+0.30 kg/t	$17
5Continental IceContact 3	5.4 kg/t	+0.35 kg/t	$20
5Falken Winterpeak F Ice 1	5.4 kg/t	+0.35 kg/t	$20
7Michelin X Ice North 4	5.5 kg/t	+0.45 kg/t	$26
8Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2	5.7 kg/t	+0.65 kg/t	$38

The difference between best and worst was 12.9% (0.65 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2 uses about 11 gal ($38) more fuel than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

Gas/Diesel Electric

Annual Mileage

12,000 mi

km (L)

miles (US gal)

Fuel Price

$3.60/gal

GBP (£)

EUR (€)

USD ($)

Set my vehicle consumption

Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.