Test Charts / Motor
2023 Motor Summer Tire Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 205/55 R16
- Tires tested
- 8
- Disciplines
- 7
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tires
Select tires to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
2Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 117 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 119 ft | +2 ft | 11 mph | |
| 119 ft | +2 ft | 11 mph | |
| 120 ft | +3 ft | 13 mph | |
| 120 ft | +3 ft | 14 mph | |
| 123 ft | +6 ft | 18 mph | |
| 124 ft | +7 ft | 19 mph | |
| 130 ft | +13 ft | 25 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 11.2% (13 ft ≈ 0.9 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Dunlop Sport BluResponse would still be travelling at 25 mph when the Continental PremiumContact 7 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Dry Handling
Dry handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 55.2 s | Best | |
| 55.7 s | +0.50 s | |
| 55.9 s | +0.70 s | |
| 56 s | +0.80 s | |
| 56.2 s | +1.00 s | |
| 56.3 s | +1.10 s | |
| 56.7 s | +1.50 s | |
| 56.8 s | +1.60 s |
All the tires in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.
Wet
3Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 168 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 179 ft | +11 ft | 20 mph | |
| 184 ft | +16 ft | 24 mph | |
| 189 ft | +21 ft | 27 mph | |
| 193 ft | +25 ft | 29 mph | |
| 194 ft | +26 ft | 29 mph | |
| 196 ft | +28 ft | 30 mph | |
| 212 ft | +44 ft | 37 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 26.4% (44 ft ≈ 3 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Dunlop Sport BluResponse would still be travelling at 37 mph when the Continental PremiumContact 7 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Handling
Wet handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 83.8 s | Best | |
| 84.7 s | +0.90 s | |
| 84.7 s | +0.90 s | |
| 85.4 s | +1.60 s | |
| 85.6 s | +1.80 s | |
| 85.6 s | +1.80 s | |
| 87.6 s | +3.80 s | |
| 88.2 s | +4.40 s |
The difference between best and worst was 5.3% (4.4 s).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in mph
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 50.1 mph | Best | |
| 48.5 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 48.1 mph | -2.0 mph | |
| 47.8 mph | -2.3 mph | |
| 47.2 mph | -2.9 mph | |
| 47.2 mph | -2.9 mph | |
| 46.8 mph | -3.3 mph | |
| 46.0 mph | -4.1 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 8.2% (4.1 mph).
Comfort
1Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 64 dB | Best | |
| 64.2 dB | +0.20 dB | |
| 64.3 dB | +0.30 dB | |
| 64.6 dB | +0.60 dB | |
| 64.7 dB | +0.70 dB | |
| 64.9 dB | +0.90 dB | |
| 65.3 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 65.3 dB | +1.30 dB |
All the tires in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.
Value
1Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.67 kg/t | Best | $0 | |
| 0.75 kg/t | +0.08 kg/t | $35 | |
| 0.78 kg/t | +0.11 kg/t | $48 | |
| 0.8 kg/t | +0.13 kg/t | $57 | |
| 0.82 kg/t | +0.15 kg/t | $66 | |
| 0.82 kg/t | +0.15 kg/t | $66 | |
| 0.83 kg/t | +0.16 kg/t | $70 | |
| 0.89 kg/t | +0.22 kg/t | $96 |
The difference between best and worst was 32.8% (0.22 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Vredestein Ultrac uses about 27 gal ($96) more fuel than the Bridgestone Turanza T005.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Wet Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2024 AutoBild Summer Tire Test
205/55 R1620 tires tested
7 of these 8 tires tested again
2024 Summer Tire Market Overview
205/55 R1655 tires tested
7 of these 8 tires tested again
Tire Reviews Best Summer Touring Tires
205/55 R1613 tires tested
7 of these 8 tires tested again

