2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tire Test

Below are all the data points for the 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tire Test, displaying how each tire performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tire's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Nankang AR 1
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Continental SportContact 7
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
Pirelli P Zero PZ4
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect
Falken Azenis FK510

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental SportContact 7 with a result of 33.5 M. The difference between best and worst was 6.9%.

Dry Handling (Km/H)

Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R with a result of 135 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 6%.

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental SportContact 7 with a result of 27.5 M. The difference between best and worst was 33.1%.

Wet Handling (Km/H)

Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Bridgestone Potenza Sport with a result of 90 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 21.6%.

Wet Circle (m/s)

Lateral wet grip in m/s squared (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Bridgestone Potenza Sport with a result of 7.34 m/s. The difference between best and worst was 16.9%.

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Sport 4 with a result of 70 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 22.4%.

Curved Aquaplaning (m/sec2)

Remaining lateral acceleration (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 with a result of 2.3 m/sec2. The difference between best and worst was 26.1%.

Comfort Performance Overview

Noise (dB)

External noise in dB (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Pirelli P Zero PZ4 with a result of 67.9 dB. The difference between best and worst was 3.6%.

Value Performance Overview

Price

Price in local currency (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Falken Azenis FK510. The difference between best and worst was 51.1%.

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental SportContact 7 with a result of 8.4 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 17.6%.

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tire Score
1 Nankang AR 1 0%
2 Bridgestone Potenza Sport 0%
3 Continental SportContact 7 0%
4 Michelin Pilot Sport 4 0%
5 Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R 0%
6 Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 0%
7 Pirelli P Zero PZ4 0%
8 Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport 0%
9 Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect 0%
10 Falken Azenis FK510 0%
comments powered by Disqus