2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tire Test

Below are all the data points for the 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tire Test, displaying how each tire performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tire's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Continental Sport Contact 6
Falken Azenis FK510
Maxxis Victra Sport 5
Nankang Sportnex AS2 Plus
Toyo Proxes Sport

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Bridgestone Potenza Sport with a result of 33.1 M. The difference between best and worst was 11.7%.

Dry Handling (Km/H)

Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Bridgestone Potenza Sport with a result of 129.3 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 3.2%.

Subj. Dry Handling ( Points)

Subjective Dry Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S with a result of 10 Points. The difference between best and worst was 50%.

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S with a result of 34.1 M. The difference between best and worst was 17.8%.

Wet Handling (Km/H)

Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Falken Azenis FK510 with a result of 72.8 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 5.8%.

Subj. Wet Handling ( Points)

Subjective Wet Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 with a result of 9 Points. The difference between best and worst was 22.2%.

Wet Circle (m/s)

Lateral wet grip in m/s squared (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S with a result of 9.23 m/s. The difference between best and worst was 8.9%.

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Nankang Sportnex AS2 Plus with a result of 91.8 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 4.6%.

Comfort Performance Overview

Noise (dB)

External noise in dB (Lower is better)

Key Insight: All the tires in the noise test finished less than 3% apart.

Value Performance Overview

Price

Price in local currency (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Nankang Sportnex AS2 Plus. The difference between best and worst was 47.9%.

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental Sport Contact 6 with a result of 8.3 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 14.4%.

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tire Score
1 Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S 0%
2 Bridgestone Potenza Sport 0%
3 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 0%
4 Continental Sport Contact 6 0%
5 Falken Azenis FK510 0%
6 Maxxis Victra Sport 5 0%
7 Nankang Sportnex AS2 Plus 0%
8 Toyo Proxes Sport 0%
comments powered by Disqus