2019 Tire Reviews UHP Summer Tire Test

Below are all the data points for the 2019 Tire Reviews UHP Summer Tire Test, displaying how each tire performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tire's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Continental Sport Contact 6
Falken Azenis FK510
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
Toyo Proxes Sport
Kumho Ecsta PS91
Accelera PHI

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S with a result of 35 M. The difference between best and worst was 13.6%.

Dry Handling (s)

Dry handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental Sport Contact 6 with a result of 60.3 s. The difference between best and worst was 5.5%.

Subj. Dry Handling ( Points)

Subjective Dry Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental Sport Contact 6 with a result of 9 Points. The difference between best and worst was 37.8%.

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S with a result of 46.3 M. The difference between best and worst was 36.8%.

Wet Handling (s)

Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport with a result of 70.37 s. The difference between best and worst was 18.6%.

Subj. Wet Handling ( Points)

Subjective Wet Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport with a result of 9 Points. The difference between best and worst was 77.8%.

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Toyo Proxes Sport with a result of 86.9 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 4.6%.

Comfort Performance Overview

Subj. Comfort ( Points)

Subjective Comfort Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Falken Azenis FK510 with a result of 9.8 Points. The difference between best and worst was 33.7%.

Noise (dB)

External noise in dB (Lower is better)

Key Insight: All the tires in the noise test finished less than 3% apart.

Tire Weight (Kg)

Tire Weight Per Set (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport with a result of 43.5 Kg. The difference between best and worst was 15.2%.

Value Performance Overview

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental Sport Contact 6 with a result of 8.18 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 13.1%.

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tire Score
1 Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport 0%
2 Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S 0%
3 Continental Sport Contact 6 0%
4 Falken Azenis FK510 0%
5 Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 0%
6 Toyo Proxes Sport 0%
7 Kumho Ecsta PS91 0%
8 Accelera PHI 0%
comments powered by Disqus