Charts 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tire Test

Below are all the data points for the 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tire Test, displaying how each tire performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tire's plot, the better its overall performance.

How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Continental Sport Contact 6

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2

Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3

Bridgestone Potenza S001

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R

Falken Azenis FK510

Toyo Proxes Sport

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S with a result of 34.6 M. The difference between best and worst was 8%.

Dry Handling (Km/H)

Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: All the tires in the dry handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Subj. Dry Handling ( Points)

Subjective Dry Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental Sport Contact 6 with a result of 10 Points. The difference between best and worst was 40%.

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental Sport Contact 6 with a result of 30.4 M. The difference between best and worst was 15.8%.

Wet Handling (Km/H)

Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 with a result of 90.9 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 6.4%.

Subj. Wet Handling ( Points)

Subjective Wet Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental Sport Contact 6 with a result of 9 Points. The difference between best and worst was 33.3%.

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Toyo Proxes Sport with a result of 80.8 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 9%.

Comfort Performance Overview

Subj. Comfort ( Points)

Subjective Comfort Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 with a result of 10 Points. The difference between best and worst was 40%.

Noise (dB)

External noise in dB (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Toyo Proxes Sport with a result of 72.6 dB. The difference between best and worst was 4%.

Value Performance Overview

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 with a result of 9 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 10.9%.

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position	Tire	Score
1	Continental Sport Contact 6	0%
2	Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S	0%
3	Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2	0%
4	Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3	0%
5	Bridgestone Potenza S001	0%
6	Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R	0%
7	Falken Azenis FK510	0%
8	Toyo Proxes Sport	0%

2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tire Test

Performance Overview

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Dry Handling (Km/H)

Subj. Dry Handling ( Points)

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Wet Handling (Km/H)

Subj. Wet Handling ( Points)

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Comfort Performance Overview

Subj. Comfort ( Points)

Noise (dB)

Value Performance Overview

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Overall Findings

Similar Tire Tests

Best Tire Tests

Summer Tire Tests

All Season Tire Tests

Winter Tire Tests

Features

Tire Reviews

General