Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild

2018 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
195/65 R15
Tires tested
10
Disciplines
11

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
128 ft -1 ft
129 ft Best
134 ft +5 ft
141 ft +12 ft
142 ft +13 ft
143 ft +14 ft
143 ft +14 ft
144 ft +15 ft
145 ft +16 ft
146 ft +17 ft
150 ft +21 ft
RefReference Winter
154 ft +25 ft

The difference between best and worst was 20.5% (26 ft ≈ 1.8 Car Lengths).

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
68.7 mph +1.2 mph
67.5 mph Best
67.0 mph -0.5 mph
67.0 mph -0.5 mph
66.9 mph -0.6 mph
66.7 mph -0.8 mph
66.5 mph -1.0 mph
66.5 mph -1.0 mph
66.5 mph -1.0 mph
66.5 mph -1.0 mph
RefReference Winter
66.3 mph -1.2 mph
66.2 mph -1.3 mph

The difference between best and worst was 3.6% (2.5 mph).

Wet

3

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
136 ft -12 ft
148 ft Best
152 ft +4 ft
157 ft +9 ft
158 ft +10 ft
159 ft +11 ft
159 ft +11 ft
162 ft +14 ft
164 ft +16 ft
166 ft +18 ft
166 ft +18 ft
RefReference Winter
175 ft +27 ft

The difference between best and worst was 29% (39 ft ≈ 2.7 Car Lengths).

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
45.4 mph +0.1 mph
45.3 mph Best
45.0 mph -0.3 mph
45.0 mph -0.3 mph
44.7 mph -0.6 mph
44.5 mph -0.8 mph
44.4 mph -0.9 mph
44.3 mph -1.0 mph
43.9 mph -1.4 mph
RefReference Winter
43.6 mph -1.7 mph
43.4 mph -1.9 mph
43.3 mph -2.0 mph

The difference between best and worst was 4.7% (2.1 mph).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
52.9 mph Best
52.1 mph -0.8 mph
50.6 mph -2.3 mph
50.5 mph -2.4 mph
50.2 mph -2.7 mph
50.1 mph -2.8 mph
48.8 mph -4.1 mph
RefReference Winter
48.5 mph -4.4 mph
RefReference Summer
47.0 mph -5.9 mph
46.7 mph -6.2 mph
46.2 mph -6.7 mph
45.2 mph -7.7 mph

The difference between best and worst was 14.7% (7.7 mph).

Snow

2

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Winter
83 ft -1 ft
84 ft Best
86 ft +2 ft
86 ft +2 ft
87 ft +3 ft
88 ft +4 ft
89 ft +5 ft
90 ft +6 ft
91 ft +7 ft
93 ft +9 ft
102 ft +18 ft
RefReference Summer
141 ft +57 ft

The difference between best and worst was 70.2% (58 ft ≈ 3.9 Car Lengths).

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
36.2 mph Best
RefReference Winter
36.0 mph -0.2 mph
36.0 mph -0.2 mph
36.0 mph -0.2 mph
35.8 mph -0.4 mph
35.7 mph -0.5 mph
35.7 mph -0.5 mph
35.6 mph -0.6 mph
35.2 mph -1.0 mph
35.1 mph -1.1 mph
34.2 mph -2.0 mph
RefReference Summer
19.8 mph -16.4 mph

The difference between best and worst was 45.4% (16.4 mph).

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
70.4 dB Best
70.6 dB +0.20 dB
71.1 dB +0.70 dB
71.9 dB +1.50 dB
72 dB +1.60 dB
RefReference Winter
72.4 dB +2.00 dB
RefReference Summer
72.6 dB +2.20 dB
72.7 dB +2.30 dB
73 dB +2.60 dB
73.4 dB +3.00 dB
74 dB +3.60 dB
74.6 dB +4.20 dB

The difference between best and worst was 6% (4.2 dB).

Value

3

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TireResultGap to best
36,537 miles Best
32,125 miles -4,412 miles
31,193 miles -5,344 miles
28,397 miles -8,140 miles
26,843 miles -9,694 miles
26,657 miles -9,880 miles
24,855 miles -11,682 miles
22,059 miles -14,478 miles
21,562 miles -14,975 miles
20,008 miles -16,529 miles

The difference between best and worst was 45.2% (16,529 miles).

Value

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear

Lower is better ↓
Value
Position / TireResultGap to bestcost per 1,000 miles
4.84 Price/1000 Best €19.36
5.01 Price/1000 +0.17 Price/1000 €25.48
5.27 Price/1000 +0.43 Price/1000 €19.00
5.58 Price/1000 +0.74 Price/1000 €17.76
5.79 Price/1000 +0.95 Price/1000 €20.58
6.24 Price/1000 +1.40 Price/1000 €16.74
6.63 Price/1000 +1.79 Price/1000 €19.61
7.06 Price/1000 +2.22 Price/1000 €23.15
7.46 Price/1000 +2.62 Price/1000 €15.19
8.07 Price/1000 +3.23 Price/1000 €28.19

The difference between best and worst was 66.7% (3.23 Price/1000). Over 25,000 miles the cheapest tire to own (Nokian WeatherProof) works out €325 cheaper than the most expensive (Pirelli Cinturato All Season Plus).

How this is calculated

Assumes a typical car doing 29 mpg (rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €6.25 per gallon and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2018 test; financing costs are excluded.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.41 kg/t Best $0
8.15 kg/t +0.74 kg/t $29
8.48 kg/t +1.07 kg/t $42
8.55 kg/t +1.14 kg/t $45
8.9 kg/t +1.49 kg/t $59
8.91 kg/t +1.50 kg/t $59
8.92 kg/t +1.51 kg/t $60
9.05 kg/t +1.64 kg/t $65
9.45 kg/t +2.04 kg/t $81
RefReference Summer
9.6 kg/t +2.19 kg/t $87
RefReference Winter
9.96 kg/t +2.55 kg/t $101
9.99 kg/t +2.58 kg/t $102

The difference between best and worst was 34.8% (2.58 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Nexen N Blue 4 Season uses about 28 gal ($102) more fuel than the Nokian WeatherProof.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.