Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Toyo Proxes Comfort
- TR Score
- 8.4/10
- Owners say
- 80% · 119
- TR Score
- 8.4/10
- Owners say
- 81% · 19
In the 12 independent tests that ran both tires, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun finished ahead 8 times and the Proxes Comfort twice, with 2 level. The ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun stopped 4.5% shorter in the wet; the Proxes Comfort had 4% lower rolling resistance.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose Falken ZE310 for mixed-weather driving, frequent rain, and value/wear emphasis. Choose Toyo Proxes Comfort for primarily dry, urban or motorway use where low noise and fuel efficiency matter most.
Where the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is stronger
- Outstanding wet braking and aquaplaning resistance (multiple tests show 5-23% aquaplaning advantage)
- Confident, stable handling with strong subjective comfort scores
- Often better wear and value/pricing in comparative tests
Where the Proxes Comfort is stronger
- Shorter dry braking in most tests and competitive dry handling
- Very low rolling resistance and lighter weight (efficiency advantage)
- Low exterior noise and refined ride character
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Proxes Comfort at a glance
| Category | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Gap | Proxes Comfort |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won12 shared tests | 8 | 2 level | 2 |
| Dry21 measurements | 8 | The Proxes Comfort stopped 0.9% shorter in the dry (12 tests) | 13 |
| Wet41 measurements | 31 | The ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun stopped 4.5% shorter in the wet (12 tests) | 9 |
| Off road10 measurements | 6 | 4 | |
| Comfort12 measurements | 5 | 7 | |
| Value14 measurements | 6 | The Proxes Comfort had 4% lower rolling resistance (8 tests) | 8 |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 8.4/10 | Level | 8.4/10 |
| Owner rating119 and 19 reviews | 80% | Too close to call | 81% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 78% | Too close to call | 79% |
| Pricein the 8 tests that listed prices | +4.1% | The ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was dearer in 5 of 8 | Cheaper |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 86 | 48 sizes made in both | 63 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 12 tests, 2021 to 2024
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Field | Proxes Comfort |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Motorhome Summer Tire Test | P8 of 10 | P8 of 10 | |
| 2024 AutoBild Summer Tire Test | P7 of 20 | P7 of 20 | |
| 2024 Summer Tire Market Overview | P7 of 55 | P6 of 55 | |
| 2023 Best SUV Tires Tested | P3 of 12 | P8 of 12 | |
| 2023 ADAC Summer Tire Test | P6 of 50 | P14 of 50 | |
| Tire Reviews Best Summer Touring Tires | P6 of 13 | P9 of 13 | |
| 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test | P5 of 21 | P11 of 21 | |
| 2022 Summer Tire Market Overview | P5 of 50 | P9 of 50 | |
| 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tire Test | P15 of 20 | P11 of 20 | |
| 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tire Test | P9 of 11 | P11 of 11 | |
| 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tire Test | P6 of 10 | P9 of 10 | |
| 2021 53 Summer Tire Braking Test | P8 of 53 | P17 of 53 |
Performance profile
16 measurements from the 12 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Proxes Comfort
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. 10 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Proxes Comfort
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Proxes Comfort
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun 80% from 119 reviews and the Proxes Comfort 81% from 19. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Gap | Proxes Comfort | Wins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 121 | 0.9% | 120 | 4-8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 52.04 | 0.5% | 52.28 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 62.5 | 0.3% | 62.7 | 2-5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 5.9% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 132 | 4.5% | 138 | 10-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 117 | 7.7% | 127 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 86.58 | 0.1% | 86.67 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 45 | 0.4% | 45.2 | 3-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 5.3% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 14.2 | 0.8% | 14.1 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13.33 | 1.1% | 13.17 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 52.9 | 3.8% | 51 | 9-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 17.7 | 8.6% | 16.7 | 5-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 41.1 | 1.4% | 40.5 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1,777 | 2.6% | 1,824 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 41.3 | 2% | 40.5 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1,803 | 4.1% | 1,736 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 686 | 4.8% | 647 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 732 | 6.4% | 697 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 8.7% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 70.8 | 0.3 dB | 70.49 | 4-5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 19.8 | 9.9% | 17.8 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 21,279 | 5.9% | 20,205 | 3-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.83 | 4% | 8.46 | 2-6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.9 | 1.7% | 5.8 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 75.7 | 0.3% | 75.9 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 8.4 and the Proxes Comfort 8.4 out of 10.
| ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Category | Proxes Comfort | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 70 | Dry | 80 | ||
| 79 | Wet | 64 | ||
| 62 | Comfort | 54 | ||
| 42 | Value | 54 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Category | Proxes Comfort | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.6 | Dry Grip | 8.4 | ||
| 8.2 | Wet Grip | 8.3 | ||
| 8.1 | Road Feedback | 8 | ||
| 8 | Handling | 7.5 | ||
| 7.7 | Wear | 8.4 | ||
| 7.9 | Comfort | 8.3 | ||
Owners rate the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun 80% from 119 reviews and the Proxes Comfort 81% from 19. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- 80%from 119 reviews
- 78%would buy again
- 1,000,122 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers generally describe the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun as an excellent value summer touring tire with strong wet-weather safety (including aquaplaning resistance) and confident dry grip, often punching above its price class. A very common highlight is low cabin noise and an overall smooth, secure feel, with many users also reporting good wear life over high mileage. The most recurring drawbacks are higher rolling resistance (fuel consumption increase for some cars) and a softer/less precise steering feel that can disappoint more performance-focused drivers, with a subset also finding the ride firmer on rough roads.
- Strong wet grip and reassuring aquaplaning resistance
- Good dry grip and braking
- Low road noise / quiet cabin
- Good value for money
- Higher rolling resistance leading to increased fuel consumption for some drivers
- Soft sidewalls or less precise steering/feedback (not ideal for hard sporty driving)
- Firm/harsh ride on rough roads for some vehicles/setups
Summarised by AI from 107 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 119 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun reviewsA quiet tire, very predictable/forgiving at the limit, especially in the rain, with a soft sidewall.These miles were covered with spirited driving on winding roads.
Toyo Proxes Comfort
- 81%from 19 reviews
- 79%would buy again
- 229,500 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers report the Toyo Proxes Comfort delivers strong wet and dry grip with stable, predictable handling, often comparing it favorably to premium brands for the money. Many also highlight a quiet, comfortable ride and good wear rates/tread life for its price class. A smaller minority note it's more suited to calm daily driving, with reduced feedback and earlier understeer when pushed hard.
- Strong wet grip and confidence in rain
- Good dry grip and stable handling
- Quiet ride and good comfort (especially on motorways)
- Excellent value for money versus premium alternatives
- Limited feedback/less suitable for sporty driving (can understeer or feel less confident when pushed)
Summarised by AI from 17 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 19 Proxes Comfort reviewsThis is my first set of Toyo Proxes, they have really impressed me so far i'm around 5000+ miles with them on the rear of my BMW 3 series. I have cheap Chinese Mazzini tires on the front that came with then car (Don't buy them!) they are awful, but highlight the difference between cheap budget tires and good mid range. The front end feels honestly bad while the Toyos on the rear feel super planted, it's a genuine noticeable difference. The Toyos are so good in wet and dry they always feel stable and have loads of grip. I ran them trough winter with no issues never lost traction. I drive lots of twisty B roads they are actually pretty fun to drive on given the comfort bias which is also really good. They soak up bumps and potholes really well and are very quiet. Im really blown away by how good they are i've always fitted premium brands (Michelin, Bridgestone, Goodyear) but the Toyos are actually my favorite so far. I Guess tread life might be the only differentiator but so far after 5000 miles they look as good as the day they were put on.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tire: 86 sizes of the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun and 63 of the Proxes Comfort, 48 of them made in both.
| Category | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Proxes Comfort |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Summer | Summer |
| Sizes made | 86 sizes, 14 to 19 inch | 63 sizes, 14 to 20 inch |
| Made in both | 48 sizes 185/60 R14185/55 R15185/60 R15185/65 R15195/50 R15195/55 R15195/60 R15195/65 R15185/55 R16195/45 R16195/50 R16195/55 R16and 36 more | |
| EU label wet grip | A100% | A100% |
| EU label rolling resistance | D50%C47%B2%A1% | C74%D26% |
| EU label noise | 67-72 dB A74%B26% | 70-71 dB B100% |
| On the market since | 2017 | - |
| Replaced | Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun (2012) | Toyo Proxes CF2 |
| Replaced by | Falken ZIEX ZE320 | - |
| Price in the shared tests | The ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was the dearer tire in 5 of the 8 tests that listed prices, by 4.1% on average. Each test priced the tires in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
This head-to-head pits two popular premium-touring summer tires aimed at everyday drivers: the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun and the Toyo Proxes Comfort. Both target confident all-round road manners with comfort and efficiency, yet they take different routes to get there.
Across 12 shared tests, a clear pattern emerges: Falken consistently excels in wet safety and aquaplaning resistance, while Toyo typically delivers shorter dry stops and lower rolling resistance. Pricing swings by test and size, but value scores and wear often favor Falken. The result is a choice between all-weather security versus efficiency-leaning comfort.
Conclusion
If you prioritize wet-road security, the Falken ZE310 is the safer bet. It dominates wet braking (10 wins to 2), leads straight and curved aquaplaning across almost every test, and often pairs that with composed dry handling. Its value and wear results frequently land above Toyo, strengthening its case for cost-conscious buyers who won't compromise on rain performance.
The Toyo Proxes Comfort suits drivers who value quiet cruising, light weight, and fuel efficiency. It more often edges dry braking and rolling resistance, and remains competitive in dry handling, though its wet braking is commonly longer. For predominantly urban, fair-weather use or efficiency-focused motorists, Toyo makes sense. For mixed climates and confident wet safety, Falken is the clearer choice.
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Proxes Comfort: your questions
Is the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or the Toyo Proxes Comfort the better tire?
In the 12 independent tests that ran both tires, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun finished ahead 8 times and the Proxes Comfort twice, with 2 level. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 8.4 and the Proxes Comfort 8.4 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or the Proxes Comfort?
The ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun led 31 of the 41 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 4.5% shorter in the wet across 12 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Proxes Comfort led 13 of the 21 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 0.9% shorter in the dry across 12 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun lasted 5.9% longer in the wear tests (4 tests); the Proxes Comfort had 4% lower rolling resistance (8 tests). Owners rate wear 7.7/10 for the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun and 8.4/10 for the Proxes Comfort.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 7.9/10 for the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun and 8.3/10 for the Proxes Comfort.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun 80% from 119 reviews and the Proxes Comfort 81% from 19. 78% of ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun owners would buy it again, against 79% for the Proxes Comfort.
Which is more expensive?
In the 8 tests that listed prices, the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was the dearer tire in 5 of them, by 4.1% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is made in 86 sizes (14 to 19 inch) and the Proxes Comfort in 63 (14 to 20 inch). 48 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is graded A for wet grip and D for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Proxes Comfort A and C.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Kumho Ecsta HS52
3-4 in 7 shared tests
vs
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Toyo Proxes Comfort
7-0 in 8 shared tests
vs
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4
3-5 in 9 shared tests
vs
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Toyo Proxes Comfort
8-3 in 11 shared tests
vs 
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Nexen N Fera Primus
6-0 in 6 shared tests
vs
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
7-0 in 7 shared tests
vs
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Toyo Proxes Comfort
6-0 in 6 shared tests
vs
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
3-13 in 16 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
Discussion